Surgical Risks and Survival Outcomes in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for the Aged Over 80: A Retrospective Cohort Study

References

• Quero G, Pecorelli N, Paiella S, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: the importance of “biological age” on clinical outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2022;40:101688. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasyris S, Hatzaras I, Ntella V, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy as a feasible choice for periampullary malignancy in octogenarians. Mol Clin Oncol. 2022;17(4):148. doi:10.3892/mco.2022.2581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisch SE, Nussbaum ER, Varsanik MA, et al. Octogenarians undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing outcomes, disposition, and timing of chemotherapy. Surg Open Sci. 2022;7:58–61. doi:10.1016/j.sopen.2021.11.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SY, Fink MA, Perini M, et al. Age 80 years and over is not associated with increased morbidity and mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(5):E445–E450. doi:10.1111/ans.14039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang CM, Lee JH, Choi JK, et al. Can we recommend surgical treatment to the octogenarian with periampullary cancer? National database analysis in South Korea. Eur J Cancer. 2021;144:81–90. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020.10.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM. Mesopancreas level 3 dissection in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2021;169(2):362–368. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Choi M, Kim SH, Choi SH, Kang CM. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(3):837–843. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2018;2(5):2239–2248. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5915-0
   Google Scholar
• Jones LR, Zwart MJW, Molenaar IQ, et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: patient selection, volume criteria, and training programs. Scand J Surg. 2020;109(1):29–33. doi:10.1177/1457496920911815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantzavinou A, Uppara M, Chan J, Patel B. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy, comparing therapeutic indexes; a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2022;101:106633. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1708–13; discussion 1714. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10576.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(7):1795–1804. doi:10.1007/s11605-020-04869-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE. Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):377–383. doi:10.1007/s00464-019-06779-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SE, Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM. Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surgery. 2018;164(6):1162–1167. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabayashi T, Sui K, Murokawa T, et al. Indications for pancreaticoduodenectomy affected postoperative outcomes in octogenarians. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5(1):102–110. doi:10.1002/ags3.12395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi ST, Gough BL, Darcy CE, et al. Pancreatic resections: 30 and 90-day outcomes in octogenarians. Surg Oncol. 2021;37:101319. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Damodaran Prabha R, Chua TC, et al. Safety and efficacy of pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians. Front Surg. 2021;8:617286. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.617286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DY, Schwartz JA, Wexelman B, Kirchoff D, Yang KC, Attiyeh F. Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic malignancy in octogenarians: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):540–548. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Weinberg L, Christophi C, Nikfarjam M. The outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients aged 80 or older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB. 2017;19(6):475–482. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–591. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142(5):761–768. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142(1):20–25. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besselink MG, van Rijssen LB, Bassi C, et al. Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery. 2017;161(2):365–372. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan RC, Huang CC, Mao WR, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy hospital resource utilization in octogenarians. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):70–75. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedziwiatr M, Malczak P, Mizera M, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head tumors in the elderly - Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2018;7(3):346–364. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.021
   Google Scholar
• Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Boggi U. State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Updates Surg. 2021;73(3):873–880. doi:10.1007/s13304-021-01058-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebel LWM, Rockwood K. Determination of biological age: geriatric assessment vs biological biomarkers. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23(9):104. doi:10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiozawa S, Usui T, Kuhara K, et al. Eligibility criteria specific to pancreaticoduodenectomy for octogenarians: single-center opinion. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(4):2037–2043. doi:10.21873/anticanres.11549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966–972. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar