139
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

New-generation filler based on cross-linked carboxymethylcellulose: study of 350 patients with 3-year follow-up

&
Pages 147-155 | Published online: 06 Jan 2015

References

  • KablikJMonheitGDYuLChangGGershkovichJComparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillersDermatol Surg200935Suppl 130231219207319
  • MicheelsPBesseSFlynnTCSarazinDElbazYSuperficial dermal injection of hyaluronic acid soft tissue fillers: comparative ultrasound studyDermatol Surg2012387 Pt 21162116922759253
  • ParkKYKimHKKimBJComparative study of hyaluronic acid fillers by in vitro and in vivo testingJ Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol201428556556823495913
  • GoodmanGJBekhorPRichMRosenRHHalsteadMBRogersJDA comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject studyClin Cosmet Investig Dermatol20114197205
  • CourtoisJEBui Khac DiepResearch on the determination of cellulases and hemicellulases in pharmaceutical preparations. II. Preparation and analytical inspection of carboxymethylcelluloseAnn Pharm Fr196523116496625859196
  • BarbucciRLeoneGVecchiulloANovel carboxymethylcellulose-based microporous hydrogels suitable for drug deliveryJ Biomater Sci Polym Ed200415560761915264662
  • SangalliMEGiunchediPColomboPConteUGazzanigaALa MannaACross-linked sodium carboxymethylcellulose as a carrier for dissolution rate improvement of drugsBoll Chim Farm19891287–82422472611009
  • MohammedFATopical permeation characteristics of diclofenac sodium from NaCMC gels in comparison with conventional gel formulationsDrug Dev Ind Pharm200127101083109711794811
  • FalconeSJDoerflerAMBergRANovel synthetic dermal fillers based on sodium carboxymethylcellulose: comparison with Crosslinked hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillersDermatol Surg200733Suppl 2S136S14318086051
  • DayDJLittlerCMSwiftRWGottliebSThe wrinkle severity rating scale: a validation studyAm J Clin Dermatol200451495214979743
  • NarinsRSBrandtFLeydenJLorencZPRubinMSmithSA randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial foldsDermatol Surg20032958859512786700
  • GruzmanMKBashuraGSRheolocic properties of sodium-carboxymethyl cellulose and methylcelluloseFarm Zh196419535814344457
  • LeonardisMPalangeADornellesRFHundFUse of cross-linked carboxymethyl cellulose for soft-tissue augmentation: preliminary clinical studiesClin Interv Aging20109;5317322
  • AscherBBayerlCBrunPEfficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines – 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison studyJ Cosmet Dermatol201110949821649813
  • LemperleGottfriedHuman Histology and Persistence of Various Injectable Filler Substances for Soft Tissue Augmentation AesthPlast Surg200327354366
  • NarinsRSDayanSHBrandtFSBaldwinEKPersistence and improvement of nasolabial fold correction with nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid 100,000 gel particles/mL filler on two retreatment schedules: results up to 18 months on two retreatment schedulesDermatol Surg200834Suppl 1S2S8 discussion S818547177
  • Calcium Hydroxylapatite versus Nonanimal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds: A 12-Month, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Split-Face Trial. Moers-Carpi MM, Tufet JODermatol Surg200834221021518093199
  • DurantiFInjectable Hyaluronic acid gel for soft tissue augmentationDermatol. Surg199824131713259865196
  • CarruthersARandomized, Double blind comparison of the efficacity of two hyaluronic acid derivatives, Restylane Perlane and hylaform, in the treatment of nasolabial foldDermatolog Surg20053115911598
  • LoweNJHyaluronic acid skin fillers: adverse reactions and skin testingJ Am Acad Dermatol20014593093311712042