116
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

The RECORD reporting guidelines: meeting the methodological and ethical demands of transparency in research using routinely-collected health data

, , , &
Pages 389-392 | Published online: 19 Oct 2016

References

  • Council of Canadian AcademiesAccessing Health and Health-Related Data in CanadaThe Expert Panel on Timely Access to Health and Social Data for Health Research and Health System innovationOttawa, CanadaCouncil of Canadian Academies2015
  • Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada’s Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Improving health outcomes through evidence-informed careOttawa, CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research2011
  • HoffmanSPodgurskiAThe use and misuse of biomedical data: is bigger really better?Am J Law Med201339449753824494442
  • CohenIGAmarasinghamRShahAXieBLoBThe legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health careHealth Aff (Millwood)20143371139114725006139
  • DeanBBLamJNatoliJLButlerQAguilarDNordykeRJReview: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research a literature reviewMed Care Res Rev200966661163819279318
  • HarpeSEUsing secondary data sources for pharmacoepidemiology and outcomes researchPharmacotherapy200929213815319170584
  • GuttmannANakhlaMHendersonMValidation of a health administrative data algorithm for assessing the epidemiology of diabetes in Canadian childrenPediatr Diabetes201011212212819500278
  • KreuterFPengRDExtracting information from big data: Issues of measurement, inference and linkageLaneJStoddenVBenderSNissenbaumHPrivacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for EngagementCambridgeCambridge University Press2014257275
  • MarstonLCarpenterJRWaltersKRMorrisRWNazarethIPetersenIIssues in multiple imputation of missing data for large general practice clinical databasesPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf201019661862620306452
  • SørensenHTLashTLRothmanKJBeyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studiesHepatology20064451075108217058242
  • FreemantleNMarstonLWaltersKWoodJReynoldsMRPetersenIMaking inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational researchBMJ2013347f640924217206
  • WeiskopfNGWengCMethods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchJ Am Med Inform Assoc201320114415122733976
  • de LusignanSvan WeelCThe use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challengesFam Pract200623225326316368704
  • HemkensLGBenchimolEILanganSMBrielMKasendaBJanuelJ-MHerrettEvon ElmEThe Reporting of Studies Using Routinely Collected Health Data was often insufficientJ Clin Epidemiol2016622 Epub ahead of print
  • BenchimolEIManuelDGToTGriffithsAMRabeneckLGuttmannADevelopment and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative dataJ Clin Epidemiol201164882182921194889
  • CollinsFSTabakLAPolicy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibilityNature2014505748561261324482835
  • WagerEKleinertSResponsible research publication: international standards for authorsMayerTSteneckNPromoting Research Integrity in a Global EnvironmentSingaporeImperial College Press/World Scientific Publishing2011309316
  • World Medical AssociationWMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human SubjectsFortaleza, BrazilWorld Medical Association2013
  • FriedmanSLFinding treasure: Data sharing and secondary analysis in developmental scienceJ Appl Dev Psychol2007285–6384389
  • IoannidisJPAThe importance of potential studies that have not existed and registration of observational data setsJAMA2012308657557622871867
  • CarterPLaurieGTDixon-WoodsMThe social licence for research: why care data ran into troubleJ Med Ethics201541540440925617016
  • von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGotzschePCVanden-brouckeJPThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesEpidemiology200718680080418049194
  • LanganSMBenchimolEIGuttmannASetting the RECORD straight: developing a guideline for the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected DataClin Epidemiol20135293123413321
  • BenchimolEILanganSGuttmannACall to RECORD: the need for complete reporting of research using routinely collected health dataJ Clin Epidemiol201366770370523186992
  • BenchimolEISmeethLGuttmanAThe REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) StatementPLoS Med20151210e100188526440803
  • NichollsSGQuachPvon ElmEThe REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) statement: Methods for arriving at consensus and developing reporting guidelinesPLoS One2015105e0125620 Available from: http://www.record-statement.org/Accessed July 4, 201625965407
  • RECORD [homepage on the Internet]REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Data Available from: http://www.record-statement.org/forum/Accessed July 21, 2016
  • TurnerLShamseerLAltmanDGConsolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journalsCochrane Database Syst Rev201211Mr00003023152285
  • SorensenAAWojahnRDManskeMCCalfeeRPUsing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to assess reporting of observational trials in hand surgeryJ Hand Surg Am201338815841589.e158223845586
  • ArmstrongRWatersEMooreLImproving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORTJ Public Health (Oxf)200830110310918204086
  • MoherDCookDJEastwoodSOlkinIRennieDStroupDFImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysesLancet199935491931896190010584742
  • PradySLRichmondSJMortonVMMacphersonHA systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trialsPLoS One200832e157718270568
  • CoboECortesJRiberaJMEffect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trialBMJ2011343d678322108262