Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians

References

• VandenbrouckeJPThe history of confoundingSoz Praventiv Med2002474216224
   Google Scholar
• MorabiaAHistory of the modern epidemiological concept of confoundingJ Epidemiol Commun H2011654297300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSRobinsJMIdentifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confoundingInt J Epidemiol19861534134193771081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuXCruickshankKMcNameeRCase-control study of stroke and the quality of hypertension control in North West EnglandBMJ199731470762722769022492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSMorgensternHConfounding in health researchAnnu Rev Publ Health200122189212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSPearlJRobinsJMCausal diagrams for epidemiologic researchEpidemiology199910137489888278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneeweissSSuissaSAdvanced approaches to controlling confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studiesStromBLKimmelSEHennesySTextbook of Pharmacoepidemiology2nd edUKJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd2013324336
   Google Scholar
• KestenbaumBEpidemiology and Biostatistics – An Introduction to Clinical ResearchNew YorkSpringer2009
   Google Scholar
• RothmanKEpidemiology – An IntroductionUKOxford University Press2002
   Google Scholar
• MannocciAThe Mantel-Haenszel procedure. 50 years of the statistical method for confounders controlItal J Public Health200964338340
   Google Scholar
• MantelNHaenszelWStatistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of diseaseJ Natl Cancer I1959224719748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NamHSKimHCKimYDLong-term mortality in patients with stroke of undetermined etiologyStroke201243112948295622933583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KirkwoodBRSterneJACMedical StatisticsUKBlackwell2003
   Google Scholar
• ChoiBCKde GuiaNAWalshPLook before you leap: stratify before you standardizeAm J Epidemiol1999149121087109610369502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandenbrouckeJPShould we abandon statistical modeling altogetherAm J Epidemiol1987126110133296742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroenwoldRHHKlungelOHAltmanDGAdjustment for continuous confounders: an example of how to prevent residual confoundingCMAJ2013185540140623401401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalterSTiemeierHVariable selection: current practice in epidemiological studiesEur J Epidemiol2009241273373619967429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrookhartMASturmerTGlynnRJRassenJSchneeweissSConfounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approachesMed Care2010486 supplS114S12020473199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurthTWalkerAMGlynnRJResults of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effectAm J Epidemiol2006163326227016371515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van SmedenMde GrootJAHMoonsKGMNo rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysisBMC Med Res Methodol201616116327881078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TibshiraniRThe lasso method for variable selection in the Cox modelStat Med19971643853959044528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AkaikeHNew look at statistical-model identificationIEEE T Automat Contr1974Ac196716723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSInvited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confoundersAm J Epidemiol2008167552352918227100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSWhen should epidemiologic regressions use random coefficients?Biometrics200056391592110985237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNameeRRegression modelling and other methods to control confoundingOccup Environ Med200562750050615961628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AustinPCAn introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studiesMultivar Behav Res2011463399424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiettinenOSStratification by a multivariate confounder scoreAm J Epidemiol19761046609620998608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PirracchioRResche-RigonMChevretSEvaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample sizeBmc Med Res Methodol2012127022646911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AustinPCMamdaniMMA comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin useStat Med200625122084210616220490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’AgostinoRBPropensity scores in cardiovascular researchCirculation2007115172340234317470708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsonEMorleyRLucasACarpenterJPropensity scores: from naive enthusiasm to intuitive understandingStat Methods Med Res201221327329321262780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeitzenSLapaneKLToledanoAYHumeALMorVWeaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounderPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf200514422723815386700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FranklinJMRassenJAAckermannDBartelsDBSchneeweissSMetrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effectsStat Med201433101685169924323618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SturmerTRothmanKJAvornJGlynnRJTreatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution – a simulation studyAm J Epidemiol2010172784385420716704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneeweissSRassenJAGlynnRJAvornJMogunHBrookhartMAHigh-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims dataEpidemiology200920451252219487948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HungT-YLeeY-KHuangM-YHsuC-YSuY-CIncreased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with burn injury: a nationwide cohort study in TaiwanScand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med20162414427052491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TohSRodriguezLAGHernanMAConfounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical recordsPharmacoepidem Dr S2011208849857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RassenJAGlynnRJBrookhartMASchneeweissSCovariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samplesAm J Epidemiol2011173121404141321602301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HernanMAHernandez-DiazSWerlerMMMitchellAACausal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiologyAm J Epidemiol2002155217618411790682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeeleTJVansteelandtSConceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and compositionStat Interface200924457468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSAn introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologistsInt J Epidemiol2000296110211101554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneeweissSEddingsWGlynRJFranklinJMImproving empirical variable selection in propensity-score models with high-dimensional covariate space using healthcare databasesPharmacoepidem Dr S2014231111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeHVPooleCBrookhartAMSchoenbachVJBeachKJSturmerTEffects of aggregation of medical codes on the performance of the high-dimensional propensity score (hd-PS) algorithmPharmacoepidem Dr S201322181181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FranklinJMEddingsWGlynnRJSchneeweissSRegularized regression versus the high-dimensional propensity score for confounding adjustment in secondary database analysesAm J Epidemiol2015182765165926233956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinkelmayerWCKurthTPropensity scores: help or hype?Nephrol Dial Transplant20041971671167315069182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CepedaMSBostonRFarrarJTStromBLComparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confoundersAm J Epidemiol2003158328028712882951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlynnRJGagneJJSchneeweissSRole of disease risk scores in comparative effectiveness research with emerging therapiesPharmacoepidem Dr S201221138147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArbogastPGRayWAUse of disease risk scores in pharmacoepidemiologic studiesStat Methods Med Res2009181678018562398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtAFKlungelOHGroenwoldRHHConsortiumGAdjusting for confounding in early postlaunch settings going beyond logistic regression modelsEpidemiology201627113314226436519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HernánMRobinsJMEstimating causal effects from epidemiological dataJ Epidemiol Community Health20066057858616790829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobinsJMHernanMABrumbackBMarginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiologyEpidemiology200011555056010955408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobinsJA new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period – application to control of the healthy worker survivor effectMath Modelling198679–1213931512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlynnRJSchneeweissSSturmerTIndications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiologyBasic Clin Pharmacol2006983253259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoffmannKPischonTSchulzMSchulzeMBRayJBoeingHA statistical test for the equality of differently adjusted incidence rate ratiosAm J Epidemiol2008167551752218230678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JiaoLSilvermanDTSchairerCAlcohol use and risk of pancreatic cancerAm J Epidemiol200916991043105119299403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di MiliaLVandelanotteCDuncanMJThe association between short sleep and obesity after controlling for demographic, lifestyle, work and health related factorsSleep Med201314431932323419528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinhandlPengYGilbertsonDTBradburyBDCollinsAJHemoglobin variability and mortality: confounding by disease severityAm J Kidney Dis201157225526520801571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HinchcliffMJustEPodluskySVargaJChangRWKibbeWAText data extraction for a prospective, research-focused data mart: implementation and validationBmc Med Inform Decis Mak20121210622970696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ResnikDBElliottKCMillerAKA framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen scienceEnviron Sci Policy201554475481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KellingSFinkDLa SorteFAJohnstonABrunsNEHochachkaWMTaking a ‘Big Data’ approach to data quality in a citizen science projectAmbio201544S601S611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar