Sociodemographic characteristics of nonparticipants in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study

References

• FerlayJSteliarova-FoucherELortet-TieulentJCancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012Eur J Cancer20134961374140323485231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StrykerSJWolffBGCulpCELibbeSDIlstrupDMMacCartyRLNatural history of untreated colonic polypsGastroenterology1987935100910133653628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VogelsteinBFearonERHamiltonSRGenetic alterations during colorectal-tumor developmentN Engl J Med198831995255322841597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ConnellJBMaggardMAKoCYColon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition stagingJ Natl Cancer Inst200496191420142515467030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamiltonWThe CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patientsBr J Cancer2009101Suppl 2S80S8619956169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennerHStockCHoffmeisterMEffect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studiesBMJ2014348g246724922745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BretthauerMColorectal cancer screeningJ Intern Med20112702879821575082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolmeOBretthauerMFretheimAOdgaard-JensenJHoffGFlexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individualsCochrane Database Syst Rev20139CD009259
   Google Scholar
• TowlerBPIrwigLGlasziouPWellerDKewenterJScreening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccultCochrane Database Syst Rev20002CD001216
   Google Scholar
• SegnanNPatnickJvon KarsaLEuropean Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and diagnosis1st edLuxembourgPublications Office of the European Union2010
   Google Scholar
• HeresbachDManfrediSD’halluinPNBretagneJFBrangerBReview in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood testEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol200618442743316538116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HewitsonPGlasziouPIrwingLTowlerBWatsonEScreening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult (Updated 2011)Cochrane Database Syst Rev20071CD001216
   Google Scholar
• KerrJDayPBroadstockMWeirRBidwellSSystematic review of the effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancerN Z Med J20071201258U262917653247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TinmouthJLansdorp-VogelaarIAllisonJEFaecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to knowGut20156481327133726041750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennerHTaoSSuperior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopyEur J Cancer201349143049305423706981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra-BlancoAGimeno-GarciaAZQuinteroEDiagnostic accuracy of immunochemical versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screeningJ Gastroenterol201045770371220157748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurchJASoares-WeiserKSt JohnDJDiagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests used in screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic reviewJ Med Screen200714313213717925085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VartGBanziRMinozziSComparing participation rates between immunochemical and guaiac faecal occult blood tests: a systematic review and meta-analysisPrev Med2012552879222634386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoedeSLRabeneckLvan BallegooijenMHarms, benefits and costs of fecal immunochemical testing versus guaiac fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screeningPLoS One2017123e017286428296927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoolsADapperEALeeuwJRColorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic reviewEur J Public Health201626115816826370437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von WagnerCBaioGRaineRInequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in EnglandInt J Epidemiol201140371271821330344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrederiksenBLJorgensenTBrassoKHoltenIOslerMSocioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screeningBr J Cancer2010103101496150120959827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeberMFBanksEWardRSitasFPopulation characteristics related to colorectal cancer testing in New South Wales, Australia: results from the 45 and up study cohortJ Med Screen200815313714218927096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WellerDColemanDRobertsonRThe UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in EnglandBr J Cancer200797121601160518026197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeeCCMcCarthyEPPhillipsRSFactors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counselingPrev Med2005411232915916989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KogevinasMPortaMSocioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidenceIARC Sci Publ19971381772069353665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EgebergRHalkjaerJRottmannNHansenLHoltenISocial inequality and incidence of and survival from cancers of the colon and rectum in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003Eur J Cancer200844141978198818667301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrederiksenBLOslerMHarlingHDanish Colorectal Cancer GroupLadelundSJorgensenTThe impact of socioeconomic factors on 30-day mortality following elective colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide studyEur J Cancer20094571248125619136251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrederiksenBLOslerMHarlingHLadelundSJorgensenTDo patient characteristics, disease, or treatment explain social inequality in survival from colorectal cancer?Soc Sci Med20096971107111519695753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening DatabaseDanish colorectal cancer screening database, annual report 2014. The first 10 months of the first screening round of the national screening programme Available from: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/45/61245_dts%C3%A5rsrapport-2014_81-16_final_inklbilag.pdf. Updated 2016Accessed June 28, 2016
   Google Scholar
• SchmidtMSchmidtSASandegaardJLEhrensteinVPedersenLSorensenHTThe Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potentialClin Epidemiol2015744949026604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LyngeESandegaardJLReboljMThe Danish National Patient RegisterScand J Public Health2011397 Suppl303321775347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Denmark Available from: http://dst.dk/da/TilSalg/For-skningsserviceAccessed June 28, 2016
   Google Scholar
• UNESCOInternational Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 2011Quebec, CanadaUNESCO Institute for Statistics2012 Available from: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdfAccessed February 13, 2017
   Google Scholar
• OECD Project on Income Distribution and Poverty. What are equivalence scales? Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdfAccessed February 13, 2017
   Google Scholar
• PedersenCBThe Danish Civil registration SystemScand J Public Health2011397 Suppl222521775345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZouGA modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary dataAm J Epidemiol2004159770270615033648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarrosAJHirakataVNAlternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratioBMC Med Res Methodol200332114567763
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statistics DenmarkHigh-quality variables Available from: http://www.dst.dk/da/TilSalg/Forskningsservice/Dokumentation/hoejkvalitetsvariableAccessed March 10, 2017
   Google Scholar
• JensenLFPedersenAFAndersenBVestergaardMVedstedPNonparticipation in breast cancer screening for women with chronic diseases and multimorbidity: a population-based cohort studyBMC Cancer20151579826502879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DigbyJMcDonaldPJStrachanJALibbyGSteeleRJFraserCGUse of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programmeJ Med Screen2013202808524009088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JensenLFPedersenAFAndersenBVedstedPIdentifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening--population-based registry study of participation and socio-demographyBMC Cancer20121251823151053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithSKSimpsonJMTrevenaLJMcCafferyKJFactors associated with informed decisions and participation in bowel cancer screening among adults with lower education and literacyMed Decis Making201434675677224421292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerrerRKleinWMRisk perceptions and health behaviorCurr Opin Psychol20155858926258160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WardleJvon WagnerCKralj-HansIEffects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS bowel cancer screening programme (ASCEND): four cluster-randomised controlled trialsLancet20163871002075175926680217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PurnellJQThompsonTKreuterMWMcBrideTDBehavioral economics: “Nudging” underserved populations to be screened for cancerPrev Chronic Dis201512E0625590600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowerEMilesAvon WagnerCRobbKWardleJUptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participationFuture Oncol2009591371138819903066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar