Comment on “Fecal occult blood versus DNA testing: indirect comparison in a colorectal cancer screening population”

David A AhlquistDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Pages 435-438 | Published online: 28 Aug 2017

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

BrennerHChenHFecal occult blood versus DNA testing: indirect comparison in a colorectal cancer screening populationClin Epidemiol2017937738428761377
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ImperialeTFRansohoffDFItzkowitzSHMultitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screeningN Engl J Med2014370141287129724645800
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrennerHTaoSSuperior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopyEur J Cancer201349143049305423706981
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HundtSHaugUBrennerHComparative evaluation of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal adenoma detectionAnn Intern Med2009150316216919189905
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RubecaTRapiSConfortiniMEvaluation of diagnostic accuracy of screening by fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Comparison of FOB gold and OC sensor assays in a consecutive prospective screening settingInt J Biol Markers200621315716117013797
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FaivreJDancourtVDenisBComparison between a guaiac and three immunochemical faecal occult blood tests in screening for colorectal cancerEur J Cancer201248162969297622572481
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RedwoodDGAsayEDBlakeIDStool DNA testing for screening detection of colorectal neoplasia in Alaska native peopleMayo Clin Proc2016911617026520415
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KnudsenABZauberAGRutterCMEstimation of benefits, burden, and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: modeling study for the US preventive services task forceJAMA2016315232595260927305518
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

References

BrennerHChenHFecal occult blood versus DNA testing: indirect comparison in a colorectal cancer screening populationClin Epidemiol2017937738428761377
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AhlquistDAMulti-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screeningDig Dis Sci201560362363325492503
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SchreudersEHRucoARabeneckLColorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmesGut201564101637164926041752
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LinJSPiperMAPerdueLAScreening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task ForceJAMA2016315232576259427305422
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ImperialeTFRansohoffDFItzkowitzSHMultitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screeningN Engl J Med2014370141287129724645800
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LeeJKLilesEGBentSLevinTRCorleyDAAccuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysisAnn Intern Med2014160317124658694
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrennerHWernerSChenHMultitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screeningN Engl J Med2014371184185
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Comment on “Fecal occult blood versus DNA testing: indirect comparison in a colorectal cancer screening population”

References

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Comment on “Fecal occult blood versus DNA testing: indirect comparison in a colorectal cancer screening population”

References

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date