CDEGenerator: an online platform to learn from existing data models to build model registries

Julian Varghese1 Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, [email protected]Correspondence[email protected]

Michael Fujarski2 Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Münster

Stefan Hegselmann1 Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, [email protected]

Philipp Neuhaus1 Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, [email protected]

Martin Dugas1 Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, [email protected];3 Institute of Medical Informatics, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), Münster, Germany

Pages 961-970 | Published online: 10 Aug 2018

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

RichessonRLKrischerJData standards in clinical research: gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directionsJ Am Med Inform Assoc200714668769617712081
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
NoyNFShahNHWhetzelPLBioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouseNucleic Acids Res200937W170W17319483092
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DugasMSharing clinical trial dataLancet2016387100352287
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ReisingerSJRyanPBO’HaraDJDevelopment and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databasesJ Am Med Inform Assoc201017665266220962127
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DugasMNeuhausPMeidtAPortal of medical data models: information infrastructure for medical research and healthcareDatabase (Oxford)20162016bav12126868052
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TMF [homepage]2017 Available from: http://www.tmf-ev.de/Eng-lishSite/AboutUsAccessed January 24, 2017
Google Scholar
GeßnerSNeuhausPVargheseJThe portal of medical data models: where have we been and where are we going?Stud Health Technol Inform201724585886229295221
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Clinical Data Interchange Standards ConsortiumClinical data acquisition standards harmonization (CDASH)2018 Available from: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/cdashAccessed June 18, 2018
Google Scholar
HamiltonCMStraderLCPrattJGThe PhenX toolkit: get the most from your measuresAm J Epidemiol2011174325326021749974
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrulandPBreilBFritzFDugasMInteroperability in clinical research: from metadata registries to semantically annotated CDISC ODMStud Health Technol Inform201218056456822874254
PubMedGoogle Scholar
SinaciAAErturkmenGBA federated semantic metadata registry framework for enabling interoperability across clinical research and care domainsJ Biomed Inform201346578479423751263
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VargheseJDugasMFrequency analysis of medical concepts in clinical trials and their coverage in MeSH and SNOMED-CTMethods Inf Med2015541839225346408
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DugasMFritzFKrummRBreilBAutomated UMLS-based comparison of medical formsPLoS One201387e6788323861827
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
StorckMKrummRDugasMODMSummary: a tool for automatic structured comparison of multiple medical forms based on semantic annotation with the Unified Medical Language SystemPLoS One20161110e016456927736972
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RossJTuSCariniSSimIAnalysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trialsAMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc20102010465021347148
PubMedGoogle Scholar
BrookeJSUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scaleUsability Eval Ind199618919447
Google Scholar
BangorAKortumPTMillerJTAn empirical evaluation of the system usability scaleInt J Hum Comput Interact2008246574594
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrookeJSUS: a retrospectiveJ Usability Stud2013822940
Google Scholar
TullisTSStetsonJNA comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability2004 Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.396.3677&rep=rep1&type=pdfAccessed June 18, 2018
Google Scholar
KrippendorffKEstimating the reliability, systematic error and random error of interval dataEduc Psychol Meas19703016170
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ZapfACastellSMorawietzLKarchAMeasuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data: which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?BMC Med Res Methodol2016169327495131
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LandisJRKochGGThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical dataBiometrics1977331159174843571
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
van SpallHGTorenAKissAFowlerRAEligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling reviewJAMA2007297111233124017374817
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VargheseJHolzCNeuhausPKey data elements in myeloid leukemiaStud Health Technol Inform201622828228627577388
PubMedGoogle Scholar
RothschildASLehmannHPHripcsakGInter-rater agreement in physician-coded problem listsAMIA Annu Symp Proc200564464816779119
PubMedGoogle Scholar
DugasMMeidtANeuhausPStorckMVargheseJODMedit: uniform semantic annotation for data integration in medicine based on a public metadata repositoryBMC Med Res Methodol2016166527245222
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VargheseJSandmannSDugasMOnline information infrastructure increases inter-rater reliability of medical coders: a quasi-experimental studyJ Med Internet Res201810.2196/jmir.9644
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

CDEGenerator: an online platform to learn from existing data models to build model registries

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

CDEGenerator: an online platform to learn from existing data models to build model registries

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date