Homogeneity in prediction of survival probabilities for subcategories of hipprosthesis data: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association, 2000–2013

References

• Havelin, L.I., Fenstad A. M., Salomonsson R., et al The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(4):393–401. doi:10.3109/1745367090303954419513887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makela, K.T., Matilainen M., Pulkkinen P. et al. Countrywise results of total hip replacement. An analysis of 438,733 hips based on the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(2):107–116. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.89349824650019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formal Nordic Co-Operation. The Nordic Council of Ministers Availble from: http://www.norden.org/en. Accessed May 24, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Glassou, E.N., Hansen T. B., Mäkelä K. et al. Association between hospital procedure volume and risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based study within the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(3):419–426. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2015.09.01426432511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NARA report 2015. Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association 2016 Availble from: https://stratum.registercentrum.se/Handlers/ResourceManager.ashx?ID=32308.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, E.W., Inacio M. C., Khatod M. et al. Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(12):3965–3973. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4506-426324831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encyclopedia of survey research methods. 2008 Availble from: http://methods.sagepub.com/base/download/ReferenceEntry/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n290.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Hailer, N.P., Lazarinis S., Mäkelä K. T. et al. Hydroxyapatite coating does not improve uncemented stem survival after total hip arthroplasty! Acta Orthop. 2015;86(1):18–25. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.95708825175664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junnila, M., Laaksonen I., Eskelinen A., et al. Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Acta Orthopaedica. 2016;87(6):546–553. doi:10.1080/17453674.2016.122280427550058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty for end-stage arthritis of the hip. Availble from: nice.org.uk/guidance/ta304, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Furnes, O., Paxton E., Cafri G., et al. Distributed analysis of hip implants using six national and regional registries: comparing metal-on-metal with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(Suppl 1):25–33. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.0045925520416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, P.E., Fenstad A. M., Furnes O., et al. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(5):535–541. doi:10.3109/17453674.2010.52519320919812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, P.E., Furnes O., Ivar Havelin L. et al. Outcome in design-specific comparisons between highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(4):363–369. doi:10.1080/17453674.2017.130767628375671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deere KC, Whitehouse MR, Porter M, Blom AW, Sayers A. Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study. BMJ Open. 2019 9(4): p. e026685. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allepuz, A., Havelin L., Barber T., et al. Effect of femoral head size on metal-on-HXLPE hip arthroplasty outcome in a combined analysis of six national and regional registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(Suppl 1):12–18. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.0046125520414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, S.A., Pratt N., Ryan P., et al. Duration of the increase in early postoperative mortality after elective hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(1):58–63. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.0188220048096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makela, K.T., Matilainen M., Pulkkinen P., et al. Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations. Bmj. 2014;348:f7592. doi:10.1136/bmj.f759224418635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba, A.C., Agoritsas T., Jankowski M., et al. Risk prediction models for mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure: a systematic review. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(5):881–889. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.00004323888045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echouffo-Tcheugui, J.B., Greene S. J., Papadimitriou L. et al. Population risk prediction models for incident heart failure: a systematic review. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(3):438–447. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.00189625737496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalmohamed, A., Welsing P. M., Lems W. F., et al. Calibration of FRAX (R) 3.1 to the Dutch population with data on the epidemiology of hip fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(3):861–869. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1852-222120910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann ED. Computerised decision-support tools in diabetes care: hurdles to implementation. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004;6(3):422–429. doi:10.1089/15209150477419814215198848
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leslie, W.D., Lix L. M., Johansson H., et al. Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(11):2350–2358. doi:10.1002/jbmr.12320499367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, S., Edwards D. L., Saleh A. A., et al. Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(1):23–49. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2504-524105431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochau, U., Schwarzer R., Jahn B., et al. Systematic assessment of decision-analytic models for chronic myeloid leukemia. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(2):103–115. doi:10.1007/s40258-013-0071-824385259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vieta A, Badia X, Sacristan JA. A systematic review of patient-reported and economic outcomes: value to stakeholders in the decision-making process in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2011;33(9):1225–1245. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.07.01321856000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar