Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index score on risk prediction by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging following myocardial infarction

References

• Brown KA, Heller GV, Landin RS, et al. Early dipyridamole (99m)Tc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomographic imaging 2 to 4 days after acute myocardial infarction predicts in-hospital and postdischarge cardiac events: comparison with submaximal exercise imaging. Circulation. 1999;100(20):2060–2066. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.20.206010562261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmarian JJ, Shaw LJ, Filipchuk NG, et al. A multinational study to establish the value of early adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in identifying a low-risk group for early hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(12):2448–2457. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.06917174181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-222579043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox KAA, Steg PG, Eagle KA, et al. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999–2006. JAMA. 2007;297(17):1892–1900. doi:10.1001/jama.297.17.189217473299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(23):2388–2398. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa05393517554120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Jacobsen JB, Lash TL, Bøtker HE, Sørensen HT. 25 year trends in first time hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction, subsequent short and long term mortality, and the prognostic impact of sex and comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e356. doi:10.1136/bmj.e35622279115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre H, Kahn R, Robertson RM, et al. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;109(25):3244–3255. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000133321.00456.0015198946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelde AB, Schmidt M, Madsen M, et al. Impact of co-morbidity on the risk of first-time myocardial infarction, stroke, or death after single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(4):510–515. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.03125015696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Adelborg K, et al. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records. Clin Epidemiol 2019;11:563–591.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549. doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9930-324965263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9112526604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.3558716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(3):221–229.12725876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs DR, Kroenke C, Crow R, et al. PREDICT: a simple risk score for clinical severity and long-term prognosis after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina: the Minnesota heart survey. Circulation. 1999;100(6):599–607. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.6.59910441096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundbøll J, Adelborg K, Munch T, et al. Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012832. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thygesen SK, Christiansen CF, Christensen S, Lash TL, Sørensen HT. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:83. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-8321619668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S, Baird JB, Fischer KC, Rich MW. Prognostic value of dipyridamole thallium imaging after acute myocardial infarction in older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(3):295–301.10078891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratmann HG, Mark AL, Amato M, Wittry MD, Younis LT. Risk stratification with pre-hospital discharge exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial tomography in men after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1998;136(1):87–93. doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70186-39665223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiten HJ, van Domburg RT, Valkema R, Zijlstra F, Schinkel AFL. Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging: 8-year outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(8):871–876. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jev35126792936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korbee RS, Boiten HJ, Ottenhof M, Valkema R, van Domburg RT, Schinkel AFL. What is the value of stress (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of very long-term outcome in obese patients? J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20(2):227–233. doi:10.1007/s12350-012-9657-z23188629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukky R, Fughhi I, Campagnoli T, Wassouf M, Ali A. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(1):112–118. doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0303-426582040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar