The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry

References

• Pedersen AB, Ehrenstein V, Szepligeti SK, et al. Thirty-five-year trends in first-time hospitalization for hip fracture, 1-year mortality, and the prognostic impact of comorbidity: a danish nationwide cohort study, 1980–2014. Epidemiology. 2017;28(6):898–905. doi:10.1097/EDE.000000000000072928767515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2(6):285–289. doi:10.1007/BF016231841421796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen IJ, Chiang CY, Li YH, et al. Nationwide cohort study of hip fractures: time trends in the incidence rates and projections up to 2035. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(2):681–688. doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2930-z25354653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens AS, Toson B, Close JC. Current and future burden of incident hip fractures in New South Wales, Australia. Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:200. doi:10.1007/s11657-014-0200-525385340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JM, Russell L, Khan SN. Osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;372:139–150. doi:10.1097/00003086-200003000-00016
   Google Scholar
• Lin JT, Lane JM. Osteoporosis: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;425:126–134. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000132404.30139.f2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Noveck H, Poses RM, Carson JL. Medical complications and outcomes after hip fracture repair. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(18):2053–2057. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.18.205312374513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ. 1993;307(6914):1248–1250. doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6914.12488166806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Hip Fracture Database [homepage on the Internet]. https://www.nhfd.co.uk/. Accessed 1114, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Nasjonalt hoftebruddregister [Homepage on the Internet]. https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/registers/nasjonalt-hoftebruddregister. Accessed 1114, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen PK, Röck ND, Christensen HC, Pedersen AB. The Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry 13-Year Results from a Population-Based Cohort of Hip Fracture Patients. Clin Epidemiol 2020;12:9–21. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S231578
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg J, Gelfand HM, Levy PS. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:210–220. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a0362247000537
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sund R, Nurmi-Luthje I, Luthje P, Tanninen S, Narinen A, Keskimaki I. Comparing properties of audit data and routinely collected register data in case of performance assessment of hip fracture treatment in Finland. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(5):558–566. doi:10.1160/ME038217938779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthus CM, Cappelen I, Osnes EK, et al. Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):280–285. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.00315718117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson M, Avina-Zubieta A, Lacaille D, Bernatsky S, Lix L, Jean S. The validity of administrative data to identify hip fractures is high–a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(3):278–285. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.10.00423347851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigler SK, Ellerbeck E, Whittle J, Mahnken J, Cook-Wiens G, Shireman TI. Comparing methods to identify hip fracture in a nursing home population using medicare claims. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(1):57–61. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1264-820503037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9112526604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. ICD 10 - version: 2016 [Homepage on the Internet]. World Health Organisation. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en. Published 2016 Accessed 1114, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• NOMESECO Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), Version 1.15. Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee. https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:970547/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Published 2010 Accessed 1114, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen A, Johnsen S. Vejledning for validering af data fra kliniske kvalitetsdatabaser. https://www.rkkp.dk/siteassets/om-rkkp/drift-og-udvikling/diverse-projekter/valideringmanuel_rkkp_-final_06062017.pdf. Published 2017 Accessed 1114, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Adelborg K, et al. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:563–591. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S17908331372058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549. doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9930-324965263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.10320831078660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.01018929686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson M. epiR: tools for the analysis of epidemiological data [Homepage on the Internet]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=epiR. Published 2019 Accessed 1114, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.004029617941714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoiberg MP, Gram J, Hermann P, Brixen K, Haugeberg G. The incidence of hip fractures in Norway -accuracy of the national Norwegian patient registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:372. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-37225394865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C-CD J, LJ E, FD M, GC R. Data errors in the National Hip Fracture Database. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(10):1406–1409. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.3708927694597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen DP, Rasmussen L, Hansen MR, Hallas J, Pottegard A. Comparison of the five Danish regions regarding demographic characteristics, healthcare utilization, and medication use–a descriptive cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140197. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.014019726439627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nymark T, Thomsen K, Rock ND. Diagnosis and procedure coding in relation to the DRG system. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003;165(3):207–209.12555699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar