274
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Clinical Performance of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Testing versus Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of a Large Danish Implementation Study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 203-213 | Published online: 21 Feb 2020

References

  • Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:3262–3273. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.02423751569
  • Ogilvie GS, van Niekerk D, Krajden M, et al. Effect of screening with primary cervical HPV testing vs cytology testing on high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at 48 months: the HPV FOCAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:43–52. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.746429971397
  • Leinonen MK, Nieminen P, Lonnberg S, et al. Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland. BMJ. 2012;345:e7789. doi:10.1136/bmj.e778923197596
  • Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:249–257. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-220089449
  • Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1579–1588. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa07143017942871
  • Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet. 2007;370:1764–1772. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-017919718
  • Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw KA, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial of visual, cytology and human papillomavirus screening for cancer of the cervix in rural India. Int J Cancer. 2005;116:617–623. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-021515818610
  • Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1589–1597. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa07320417942872
  • Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfstrom KM, et al. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383:524–532. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-724192252
  • Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 5):F88–F99. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.09523199969
  • Polman NJ, Snijders PJF, Kenter GG, Berkhof J, Meijer C. HPV-based cervical screening: rationale, expectations and future perspectives of the new Dutch screening programme. Prev Med. 2019;119:108–117. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.02130594536
  • Rebolj M, Rimmer J, Denton K, et al. Primary cervical screening with high risk human papillomavirus testing: observational study. BMJ. 2019;364:l240. doi:10.1136/bmj.l24030728133
  • Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). Screening for Cervical Cancer. Recommendation and Evidence Base [in Swedish]. Stockholm, Sweden: Socialstyrelsen; 2015 Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-screeningprogram/2015-6-39.pdf. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • Norwegian Cancer Registry (Kreftregisteret). HPV in Primary Screening [in Norwegian]. Oslo, Norway: Kreftregisteret; 2019 Available from https://www.kreftregisteret.no/screening/livmorhalsprogrammet/Helsepersonell/screeningstrategi-og-nasjonale-retningslinjer/HPV-i-primarscreening/. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • Ronco G, Giorgi Rossi P, Giubilato P, et al. A first survey of HPV-based screening in routine cervical cancer screening in Italy. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;3(Suppl 1):77–83.
  • Australian Government, Department of Health. National Cervical Screening Program. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Health; 2019 Available from: http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/cervical-screening-1. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • National Screening Unit, New Zealand. HPV Primary Screening. Auckland, New Zealand: National Screening Unit of New Zealand; 2017 Available from: https://www.nsu.govt.nz/health-professionals/national-cervical-screening-programme/hpv-primary-screening. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • Veijalainen O, Kares S, Kujala P, et al. Implementation of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in an organised regional screening programme: 3 years of experience. Cytopathology. 2019;30:150–156. doi:10.1111/cyt.2019.30.issue-230421573
  • Lamin H, Eklund C, Elfstrom KM, et al. Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56–60. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014788. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014788
  • Zorzi M, Frayle H, Rizzi M, et al. A 3-year interval is too short for re-screening women testing negative for human papillomavirus: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2017;124:1585–1593. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.1457528120382
  • Pasquale L, Giorgi Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al. Cervical cancer screening with HPV testing in the Valcamonica (Italy) screening programme. J Med Screen. 2015;22:38–48. doi:10.1177/096914131456170725431452
  • Passamonti B, Gustinucci D, Giorgi Rossi P, et al. Cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA primary screening test: results of a population-based screening programme in central Italy. J Med Screen. 2017;24:153–162. doi:10.1177/096914131666358027614992
  • Maggino T, Sciarrone R, Murer B, et al. Screening women for cervical cancer carcinoma with a HPV mRNA test: first results from the Venice pilot program. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:525–532. doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.21627490801
  • Del Mistro A, Frayle H, Ferro A, et al. Cervical cancer screening by high risk HPV testing in routine practice: results at one year recall of high risk HPV-positive and cytology-negative women. J Med Screen. 2014;21:30–37. doi:10.1177/096914131452221924488593
  • Zorzi M, Del Mistro A, Farruggio A, et al. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2013;120:1260–1267. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.1227223786222
  • Confortini M, Giorgi Rossi P, Barbarino P, Passarelli AM, Orzella L, Tufi MC. Screening for cervical cancer with the human papillomavirus test in an area of central Italy with no previous active cytological screening programme. J Med Screen. 2010;17:79–86. doi:10.1258/jms.2010.00909220660436
  • Gultekin M, Zayifoglu Karaca M, Kucukyildiz I, et al. Initial results of population based cervical cancer screening program using HPV testing in one million Turkish women. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:1952–1958. doi:10.1002/ijc.v142.929235108
  • Aitken CA, van Agt HME, Siebers AG, et al. Introduction of primary screening using high-risk HPV DNA detection in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 2019;17:228. doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1460-031829241
  • Danish National Board of Health. Screening Against Cervical Cancer – Recommendations [in Danish]. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Board of Health; 2012 Available from: https://www.sst.dk/~/media/B1211EAFEDFB47C5822E883205F99B79.ashx. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • Danish National Board of Health. Screening Against Cervical Cancer – Recommendations [in Danish]. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Board of Health; 2018 Available from: https://www.sst.dk/da/sygdom-og-behandling/screening/~/media/5466AB0B06184ED0969BC31DA397610D.ashx. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • Bjerregaard B, Larsen OB. The Danish Pathology Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(Suppl):72–74. doi:10.1177/140349481039356321775357
  • Danish Quality Database for Cervical Cancer Screening. Annual Report 2017 [in Danish] Vejle, Denmark: Danish Quality Database for Cervical Cancer Screening; 2018 Available from: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/82/4682_dkls-livmoderhalsscreening-aarsrapport-2017_endelig.pdf. Accessed 116, 2019.
  • Nohr B, Frydshou D, Khan HS, et al. Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Guidelines. Diagnosis, Treatment and Control of Cervical Dysplasia [In Danish]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2013 Available from: http://gynobsguideline.dk/hindsgavl/Cervixdysplasi2012.pdf. Accessed 116 2019.
  • Jensen VM, Rasmussen AW. Danish Education Registers. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39 7(Suppl):91–94.21775362
  • Petersson F, Baadsgaard M, Thygesen LC. Danish registers on personal labour market affiliation. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39 7(Suppl):95–98. doi:10.1177/140349481140848321775363
  • Kildemoes HW, Sorensen HT, Hallas J. The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39 7(Suppl):38–41. doi:10.1177/140349481039471721775349
  • Andersen JS, Olivarius N, Krasnik A. The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39 7(Suppl):34–37. doi:10.1177/140349481039471821775348
  • Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633. doi:10.1136/bmj.i363327469988
  • Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. J Low Genit Tract Di. 2015;19:91–96. doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000103
  • Arbyn M, Roelens J, Cuschieri K, et al. The APTIMA HPV assay versus the Hybrid Capture 2 test in triage of women with ASC-US or LSIL cervical cytology: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:101–108. doi:10.1002/ijc.2763622610699
  • Burger EA, Nygard M, Gyrd-Hansen D, Moger TA, Kristiansen IS. Does the primary screening test influence women’s anxiety and intention to screen for cervical cancer? A randomized survey of Norwegian women. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:360. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-36024735469
  • Danish Quality Database for Cervical Cancer Screening. Annual Report 2010 [in Danish]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Quality Database for Cervical Cancer Screening; 2010.
  • Fontaine D, Narine N, Naugler C. Unsatisfactory rates vary between cervical cytology samples prepared using ThinPrep and SurePath platforms: a review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2(2):e000847. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000847
  • Cuschieri K, Ronco G, Lorincz A, et al. Eurogin roadmap 2017: triage strategies for the management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening programs. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:735–745. doi:10.1002/ijc.3126129341110