Effect of Smoking on Breast Cancer by Adjusting for Smoking Misclassification Bias and Confounders Using a Probabilistic Bias Analysis Method

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.2149230207593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(9):635–648. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-0000622547473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry PD, Rohan TE. Cigarette smoking and the risk of breast cancer in women: a review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(10):953–971.12376493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds P. Smoking and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol. 2013;18(1):15–23. doi:10.1007/s10911-012-9269-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruba D. Smoking and breast cancer. Klinicka Onkologie. 2013;26(6):389–393. doi:10.14735/amko201338924320585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macacu A, Autier P, Boniol M, Boyle P. Active and passive smoking and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154(2):213–224. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3628-426546245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KC, Miller AB, Collishaw NE, et al. Active smoking and secondhand smoke increase breast cancer risk: the report of the Canadian expert panel on tobacco smoke and breast cancer risk (2009). Tob Control. 2011;20(1):e2. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.035931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PN, Hamling J. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and risk of breast cancer in nonsmoking women: a review with meta-analyses. Inhal Toxicol. 2006;18(14):1053–1070. doi:10.1080/0895837060094543217050342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadri G, Mahjub H. Passive or active smoking, which is more relevant to breast cancer. Saudi Med J. 2007;28(2):254–258.17268706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Huang Y-B, Liu X-O, et al. Active and passive smoking with breast cancer risk for Chinese females: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33(6):306–316. doi:10.5732/cjc.013.1024824823992
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okasha M, McCarron P, Gunnell D, Smith GD. Exposures in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;78(2):223–276. doi:10.1023/A:102298891875512725422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer–collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58 515 women with breast cancer and 95 067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(11):1234–1245. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.660059612439712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalagi K, Mansournia MA, Motevalian S-A, et al. An ad hoc method for dual adjusting for measurement errors and nonresponse bias for estimating prevalence in survey data: application to Iranian mental health survey on any illicit drug use. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(10):3062–3076. doi:10.1177/096228021769093929298600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair A, Stewart P, Lubin JH, Forastiere F. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(3):199–207. doi:10.1002/ajim.2028117096363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams-Campbell L, Devine P, Eaton D, et al. Breast Cancer and the Environment: A Life Course Approach. Washington, DC: National Acad. Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jurek AM, Greenland S, Maldonado G. Brief report: how far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of association away from the null? Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(2):382–385. doi:10.1093/ije/dym29118184671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luta G, Ford MB, Bondy M, Shields PG, Stamey JD. Bayesian sensitivity analysis methods to evaluate bias due to misclassification and missing data using informative priors and external validation data. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(2):121–126. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2012.11.00623290580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox MP, Lash TL, Greenland S. A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(6):1370–1376. doi:10.1093/ije/dyi18416172102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Fox MP, Thwin SS, et al. Using probabilistic corrections to account for abstractor agreement in medical record reviews. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(12):1454–1461. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm03417406006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLehose RF, Olshan AF, Herring AH, Honein MA, Shaw GM, Romitti PA. Bayesian methods for correcting misclassification an example from birth defects epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2009;20(1):27–35. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818ab3b019234399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson P. Measurement Error and Misclassification in Statistics and epidemiology: Impacts and Bayesian Adjustments. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Ghiasvand R, Baghfalaki T, Nadrian H, Holakouie-Naieni K. Impact of age at menarche on breast cancer: the assessment of recall bias. Arch Iran Med. 2019;22(2):65–70.30980640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, Nadrian H, Gustafson P, McCandless LC. The impact of maternal smoking during pregnancy on childhood asthma: adjusted for exposure misclassification; results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(10):697–703. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.01130150159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, Ghiasvand R, Noori-Daloii MR, Holakouie-Naieni K. Misclassification adjustment of family history of breast cancer in a case-control study: a bayesian approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8221–8226. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.18.822126745064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lash TL, Fox MP, Fink AK. Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• MacLehose RF, Gustafson P. Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian? Epidemiology. 2012;23(1):151–158. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823b539c22157311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(6):1107–1116. doi:10.1093/ije/25.6.11079027513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehiniya H, Haghighat S, Parsaeian M, et al. Iranian breast cancer risk assessment study (IRBCRAS): a case control study protocol. WCRJ. 2018;5:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mansournia MA, Higgins JP, Sterne JA, et al. Biases in randomized trials: a conversation between trialists and epidemiologists. Epidemiology. 2017;28(1):54–59. doi:10.1097/EDE.000000000000056427748683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansournia MA, Hernán MA, Greenland S. Matched designs and causal diagrams. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(3):860–869. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt08323918854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etminan M, Collins G, Mansournia M. Using causal diagrams to improve the design and interpretation of medical research. Chest. 2020. In Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe MS, Liśkiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1887–1894. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw34128089956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Vol. 29 Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Harris RJ, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ, Harbord RM, Sterne JA. Metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J. 2008;8(1):3–28. doi:10.1177/1536867X0800800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberg AJ, Worley ML, Tooze JA, et al. The validity of self-reported recent smoking in head and neck cancer surgical patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(6):990–995. doi:10.1177/019459981559438526195573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvalvik LG, Nilsen RM, Skjærven R, et al. Self-reported smoking status and plasma cotinine concentrations among pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Pediatr Res. 2012;72(1):101–107. doi:10.1038/pr.2012.3622441375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Ma E, Reid M, Jiang R, Einspahr J, Alberts DS. Accuracy of self-reported smoking status among participants in a chemoprevention trial. Prev Med. 2004;38(4):492–497. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.00615020184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu S, Humphris G, Whitley S, Cardozo A, Sandhu A. Smoking habits in patient’s who have been treated for an oral cancer: validation of self-report using saliva cotinine. Oral Oncol. 2004;40(6):576–578. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.11.00615063384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studts JL, Ghate SR, Gill JL, et al. Validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(10):1825–1828. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-039317035388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoseini M, Yunesian M, Nabizadeh R, et al. Biomonitoring of tobacco smoke exposure and self-reported smoking status among general population of Tehran, Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(24):25065–25073. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7619-827677995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen OS. Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol. 1974;99(5):325–332. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a1216174825599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansournia MA, Altman DG. Population attributable fraction. BMJ. 2018;360:k757. doi:10.1136/bmj.k75729472187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi A, Nielsen R, Mansournia MA. Methods matter: population attributable fraction (PAF) in sport and exercise medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2020;1–6.31594793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14(4):451–458. doi:10.1097/01.EDE.0000071419.41011.cf12843771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland S, Mansournia MA, Altman DG. Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight. BMJ. 2016;352:i1981. doi:10.1136/bmj.i198127121591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Fox MP, MacLehose RF, Maldonado G, McCandless LC, Greenland S. Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(6):1969–1985. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu14925080530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White E, Hunt JR, Casso D. Exposure measurement in cohort studies: the challenges of prospective data collection. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20(1):43–56. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a0179719762508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momoli F, Siemiatycki J, McBride ML, et al. Probabilistic multiple-bias modeling applied to the Canadian data from the interphone study of mobile phone use and risk of glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(7):885–893. doi:10.1093/aje/kwx15728535174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar LM, Siega‐Riz AM, Simhan HN, Diesel JC, Abrams B. The impact of exposure misclassification on associations between prepregnancy BMI and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obesity. 2010;18(11):2184–2190. doi:10.1038/oby.2010.2520168307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar LM, Himes KP, Abrams B, et al. Gestational weight gain and adverse birth outcomes in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(5):1075–1086. doi:10.1097/AOG.000000000000350431599828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva DA, Thoma ME. The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;00:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tordoff D, Andrasik M, Hajat A. Misclassification of sex assigned at birth in the behavi9oral risk factor surveillance system and transgender reproductive health: a quantitative bias analysis. Epidemiology. 2019;30(5):669–678. doi:10.1097/EDE.000000000000104631162292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar T, Elbaz A, Moisan F. Is the incidence of motor neuron disease higher in French military personnel? Amyotroph Lat Scl Fr. 2019;21:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Boyd L, Walker LC. 16. The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(Suppl 2):S77–S81. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.48922158327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northridge ME. Public health methods–attributable risk as a link between causality and public health action. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(9):1202–1204. doi:10.2105/AJPH.85.9.12027661224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gemert WA, Lanting CI, Goldbohm RA, et al. The proportion of postmenopausal breast cancer cases in the Netherlands attributable to lifestyle-related risk factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat.2015;152(1):155–162. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3447-726044369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neutel CI, Morrison H. Could recent decreases in breast cancer incidence really be due to lower HRT use? Trends in attributable risk for modifiable breast cancer risk factors in canadian women. Can J Public Health. 2010;101(5):405–409. doi:10.1007/BF0340486221214057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansournia MA, Danaei G, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Effect of physical activity on functional performance and knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis: analysis with marginal structural models. Epidemiology. 2012;23(4):631–640. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824cc1c322415107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikfarjam A, Hajimaghsoudi S, Rastegari A, et al. The frequency of alcohol use in Iranian urban population: the results of a national network scale up survey. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(2):97. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.10328812784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftekhar AM, Salehi M, Gharaei B, et al. A household study on the prevalence of substance misuse in tehran: the need for other methods to estimate the prevalence. Iran J Psychiatry. 2006;1(4):158–161.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268–274. doi:10.7326/M16-260728693043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar