Epidemiological Studies on Fetal Loss – Better Data and Research Methods are Needed

References

• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(4):189–194. doi:10.1056/NEJM1988072831904013393170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chard T. Frequency of implantation and early-pregnancy loss in natural cycles. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;5(1):179–189. doi:10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80077-X1855339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen EC, Christiansen OB, Kolte AM, Macklon N. New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage. BMC Med. 2013;11:154. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-15423803387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–e108. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-226795602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso O. Implications of using a fetuses-at-risk approach when fetuses are not at risk. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30(1):3–10. doi:10.1111/ppe.1225426768054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer MS, Zhang X, Platt RW. Analyzing risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(3):361–367. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt28524287468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Basso O, Harmon QE. Re: “analyzing risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes”. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(3):218. doi:10.1093/aje/kwu463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen J. Fetal programming and conditioning on birth in follow-up studies. SM J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;3(1):1016.
   Google Scholar
• Liew Z, Olsen J, Cui X, Ritz B, Arah OA. Bias from conditioning on live birth in pregnancy cohorts: an illustration based on neurodevelopment in children after prenatal exposure to organic pollutants. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(1):345–354. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu24925604449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz R, Kioumourtzoglou MA, Weisskopf MG. Live-birth bias and observed associations between air pollution and autism. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(11):2292–2296. doi:10.1093/aje/kwy17230099488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman K, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mukri F, Bourne T, Bottomley C, Schoeb C, Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT. Evidence of early first-trimester growth restriction in pregnancies that subsequently end in miscarriage. BJOG. 2008;115(10):1273–1278. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01833.x18715413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology. 1995;6(5):533–537. doi:10.1097/00001648-199509000-000128562631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(6):458–461. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.12731618495909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Left truncation bias as a potential explanation for the protective effect of smoking on preeclampsia. Epidemiology. 2015;26(3):436–440. doi:10.1097/EDE.000000000000026825695352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wei Y, Zhang X, et al. A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):340–351. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.03728161306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):615–625. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.4315308962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohr EA, Liew Z. How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(4):407–416. doi:10.1111/aogs.1331929415329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce N, Checkoway H, Kriebel D. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(8):562–568. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.02669017053019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CA, Zhang ZF, Arah OA. Competing risk bias to explain the inverse relationship between smoking and malignant melanoma. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(7):557–567. doi:10.1007/s10654-013-9812-023700026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munafo MR, Tilling K, Taylor AE, Evans DM, Smith GD. Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(1):226–235. doi:10.1093/ije/dyx20629040562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biele G, Gustavson K, Czajkowski NO, et al. Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(10):927–938. doi:10.1007/s10654-019-00550-131451995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso O, Juul S, Olsen J. Time to pregnancy as a correlate of fecundity: differential persistence in trying to become pregnant as a source of bias. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(5):856–861. doi:10.1093/ije/29.5.85611034969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinke D, Rich-Edwards JW, Williams PL, et al. Quantification of selection bias in studies of risk factors for birth defects among livebirths. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020. doi:10.1111/ppe.12650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech BH, Nohr EA, Vaeth M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Coffee and fetal death: a cohort study with prospective data. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(10):983–990. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi31716207803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharoah PO. Errors in birth registrations and coding of twins and higher order multiples. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2002;5(4):270–272. doi:10.1375/twin.5.4.270
   Google Scholar
• Pharoah PO, Platt MJ. Sudden infant death syndrome in twins and singletons. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10(4):644–648. doi:10.1375/twin.10.4.64417708706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand D, Platt MJ, Pharoah PO. Vanishing twin: a possible cause of cerebral impairment. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10(1):202–209. doi:10.1375/twin.10.1.20217539381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plana-Ripoll O, Parner E, Olsen J, Li J. Severe stress following bereavement during pregnancy and risk of pregnancy loss: results from a population-based cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(5):424–429. doi:10.1136/jech-2015-20624126584858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, Lidegaard O, Mortensen PB. First-time first-trimester induced abortion and risk of readmission to a psychiatric hospital in women with a history of treated mental disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(2):159–165. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.15322310504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11(5):550–560. doi:10.1097/00001648-200009000-0001110955408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the ‘black box’ of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(4):333–343. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.4.33312206468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei C, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Olsen J. Perfluorinated chemicals and fetal growth: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(11):1677–1682. doi:10.1289/ehp.1050618008003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew Z, Luo J, Nohr EA, et al. Maternal plasma perfluoroalkyl substances and miscarriage: a nested case-control study in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128(4):47007. doi:10.1289/EHP620232319790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Diaz S, Schisterman EF, Hernan MA. The birth weight “paradox” uncovered? Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(11):1115–1120. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj27516931543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso O, Wilcox AJ. Intersecting birth weight-specific mortality curves: solving the riddle. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(7):787–797. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp02419240224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ, Mumford SL, Schisterman EF. Conditioning on intermediates in perinatal epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2012;23(1):1–9. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823aca5d22157298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort–its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(4):300–307. doi:10.1177/1403494801029004020111775787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen EM, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Riis A, Sørensen HT. Cohort profile: the Danish web-based pregnancy planning study—‘Snart-Gravid’. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;38(4):938–943. doi:10.1093/ije/dyn19118782897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen LH, Petersen OB, Norgaard M, et al. Linkage between the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database, the Danish Fetal Medicine Database, and other Danish registries as a tool for the study of drug safety in pregnancy. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:91–95. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9813927274312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ, et al. Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10068):538–546. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-827988140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar