The Danish Diabetes Musculoskeletal Cohort: Non-Responder Analysis of an Electronic Survey Using Registry Data

References

• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–349. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.00818313558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):22–25. doi:10.1177/140349481038796521775345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molsted S, Tribler J, Snorgaard O. Musculoskeletal pain in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;96:135–140. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.12.02222244365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho-E-Silva AP, Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Harmer AR. Does type 2 diabetes increase the risk of musculoskeletal pain? Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of UK biobank data. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:728–734. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.05.00732521327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AD, Crippa A, Woodcock J, Brage S. Physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Diabetologia. 2016;59:2527–2545. doi:10.1007/s00125-016-4079-027747395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen JS, Olivarius Nde F, Krasnik A. The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):34–37. doi:10.1177/140349481039471821775348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9112526604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen CF, Moller MH, Nielsen H, Christensen S. The Danish Intensive Care Database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:525–530. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9947627822095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stattistics Dennmark SOCIO2013; 2020. Available from: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/dokumentation/Times/personindkomst/socio13. Accessed 41, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Beullens K, Loosveldtt G, Vamdemplas C, Stoop I. Response raes in the European Social Survey: increasing, descreasing, or a matter of fieldwork efforts? 2018. Available from: https://www.surveyinsights.org/?p=9673. Accessed 41, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prattala R. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:409–415. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9019-816804763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen HAR, Ekholm O, Davidsen M, Christensen AI. The Danish health and morbidity surveys: study design and participant characteristics. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:91. doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0733-931053088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daikeler J, Bosnjak M, Manfreda KL. Web versus otther survey modes: an updated and extended meta-analysis comparing response rattes. J Survey Stat Methodol. 2019;8:36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Engel S, et al. Self-protection strategies and health behaviour in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: results and predictors in more than 12 000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases followed in the Danish DANBIO registry. RMD Open. 2021;7:e001505. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2020-00150533402443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, Christensen MB. Paper- or web-based questionnaire invitations as a method for data collection: cross-sectional comparative study of differences in response rate, completeness of data, and financial cost. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e24. doi:10.2196/jmir.835329362206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann A, Andersen B, Ostergaard L, Larsen MB. Sense & sensibility: decision-making and sources of information in mothers who decline HPV vaccination of their adolescent daughters. Vaccine X. 2019;2:e100020. doi:10.1016/j.jvacx.2019.100020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ginnerup-Nielsen E, Christensen R, Heitmann BL, et al. Estimating the Prevalence of Knee Pain and the Association between Illness Perception Profiles and Self-Management Strategies in the Frederiksberg Cohort of Elderly Individuals with Knee Pain: a Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:668. doi:10.3390/jcm1004066833572381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer E, Couper MP, Fagerlin A, et al. The role of perceived benefits and costs in patients’ medical decisions. Health Expect. 2014;17:4–14. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00739.x22070416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper TJ. Where have the respondents gone? Perhaps we ate them all. Public Opin Q. 2019;83(S1):1. doi:10.1093/poq/nfz010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeeuw ED. Mixed-medthods: past, present, and future. Surv Res Methods. 2018;12(2):14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medway RL, Fulton J. When more gets you less: a meta-analysis of the effect of concurrent web options on mail survey response rattes. Public Opin Q. 2012;76:13. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh A, Bista K. Examinning factors impactting online survey response rates in educaion research: perceptions of graduate students. J Multidiscip Eval. 2017;13:11.
   Google Scholar
• Revilla M, Achoa C. Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. Int J Market res. 2017;59:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabdali LAS, Jaeken J, Dinant GJ, Ottenheijm RPG. Awareness of limited joint mobility in type 2 diabetes in general practice in the Netherlands: an online questionnaire survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20:98. doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0987-731288736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar