Glycemic Control in Pregnancies Complicated by Pre-Existing Diabetes Mellitus and Congenital Malformations: A Danish Population-Based Study

References

• McCance DR. Pregnancy and diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(6):945–958. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2011.07.00922115168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40.21705069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen NB, Damm P, Mathiesen ER, Ringholm L. The prevalence of congenital malformations is still higher in pregnant women with pregestational diabetes despite near-normal HbA1c: a literature review. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Neovius M, Soderling J, et al. Periconception glycaemic control in women with type 1 diabetes and risk of major birth defects: population based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2018;362:k2638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen CB, Gotzsche H, Moller JO, Mortensen PB. The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med Bull. 2006;53(4):441–449.17150149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549.24965263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen LB, Olsen J. The Danish Medical Birth Registry. Dan Med Bull. 1998;45(3):320–323.9675544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490.26604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):30–33.21775347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenstein V, Antonsen S, Pedersen L. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: Aarhus University Prescription Database. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2:273–279.21152254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arendt JFH, Hansen AT, Ladefoged SA, Sørensen HT, Pedersen L, Adelborg K. Existing data sources in clinical epidemiology: laboratory information system databases in Denmark. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;18(12):469–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao E, Zhang Y, Zeng X, Liu B. Association between maternal diabetes mellitus and the risk of congenital malformations: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Drug Discov Ther. 2015;9(4):274–281.26370526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oyen N, Diaz LJ, Leirgul E, et al. Prepregnancy diabetes and offspring risk of congenital heart disease: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2016;133(23):2243–2253.27166384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. 2015 Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period https://www.nice.org.uk/guideance/ng3.
   Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S183–S192.31862757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkster ME, Fahey TP, Donnan PT, Leese GP, Mires GJ, Murphy DJ. Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006;6:30.17074087
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suhonen L, Hiilesmaa V, Teramo K. Glycaemic control during early pregnancy and fetal malformations in women with type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2000;43(1):79–82.10663219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapolla A, Dalfra MG, Di Cianni G, Bonomo M, Parretti E, Mello G. A multicenter Italian study on pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes. Nutri Metabol Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;18(4):291–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers IM, de Valk HW, Visser GH. Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2004;328(7445):915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen DM, Korsholm L, Ovesen P, et al. Peri-conceptional A1C and risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcome in 933 women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):1046–1048.19265024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyganek K, Hebda-Szydlo A, Skupien J, et al. Glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 2 diabetes from Poland. The impact of pregnancy planning and a comparison with type 1 diabetes subjects. Endocrine. 2011;40(2):243–249.21528433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell R, Glinianaia SV, Tennant PW, Bilous RW, Rankin J. Peri-conception hyperglycaemia and nephropathy are associated with risk of congenital anomaly in women with pre-existing diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Diabetologia. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens LA, Sedar J, Carmody L, Dunne F. Comparing type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy- similar conditions or is a separate approach required? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:69.25885892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy HR, Steel SA, Roland JM, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes: influences of glycaemic control, obesity and social disadvantage. Diabetic Med. 2011;28(9):1060–1067.21843303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy HR, Bell R, Cartwright C, et al. Improved pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes but substantial clinic-to-clinic variations: a prospective nationwide study. Diabetologia. 2017;60(9):1668–1677.28597075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thygesen SK, Christiansen CF, Christensen S, Lash TL, Sorensen HT. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:83.21619668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen JK, Drivsholm TB, Carstensen B, Steding-Jensen M, Green A. [Validation of methods to identify known diabetes on the basis of health registers]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2007;169(18):1687–1692. Danish.17532878
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen H, Nielsen GL, Bendsen J, Flint C, Olsen J, Sorensen HT. Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(1):12–16.12623519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt LH, Ernst A, Lindhard MS, et al. Accuracy of the hypospadias diagnoses and surgical treatment registrations in the Danish National Patient Register. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:483–489.29042817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MS, Snerum TM, Olsen LH, et al. Accuracy of cryptorchidism diagnoses and corrective surgical treatment registration in the Danish National Patient Registry. J Urol. 2012;188(4):1324–1329.22902026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agergaard P, Hebert A, Bjerre J, Sorensen KM, Olesen C, Ostergaard JR. Children diagnosed with congenital cardiac malformations at the national university departments of pediatric cardiology: positive predictive values of data in the Danish National Patient Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:61–66.21386975
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svensson E, Ehrenstein V, Norgaard M, et al. Estimating the proportion of all observed birth defects occurring in pregnancies terminated by a second-trimester abortion. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2014;25(6):866–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt LH, Henriksen TB, Lindhard MS, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and genital anomalies in boys: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Epidemiology. 2018;29(5):739–748.29912017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar