Completeness in the Swedish Fracture Register and the Swedish National Patient Register: An Assessment of Humeral Fracture Registrations

References

• Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:Mr000034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emilsson L, Lindahl B, Koster M, Lambe M, Ludvigsson JF. Review of 103 Swedish healthcare quality registries. J Intern Med. 2015;277(1):94–136. doi:10.1111/joim.1230325174800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) (Socialstyrelsen). National Patient Register (NPR). Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/en/statistics-and-data/registers/register-information/the-national-patient-register/. Accessed 110, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) (Frakturregistret). Available from: https://sfr.registercentrum.se/. Accessed 115, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bergdahl C, Ekholm C, Wennergren D, Nilsson F, Moller M. Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:159. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1009-827072511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergdahl C, Wennergren D, Ekelund J, Möller M. Mortality after a proximal humeral fracture. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-b(11):1484–1490. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0627.R133135440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey JA, Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Adler NE. Using electronic health records for population health research: a review of methods and applications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:61–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-02135326667605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) (Socialstyrelsen). Completeness (Tackningsgrad) 2019. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2019-12-6489.pdf. Accessed 110, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-45021658213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen E, Myhr KM, Grytten N, Alstadhaug KB. Validation of the multiple sclerosis diagnosis in the Norwegian patient registry. Brain Behav. 2019;9(11):e01422. doi:10.1002/brb3.142231583850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthus CM, Cappelen I, Osnes EK, et al. Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):280–285. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.00315718117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzuto D, Feldman AL, Karlsson IK, Dahl Aslan AK, Gatz M, Pedersen NL. Detection of dementia cases in two swedish health registers: a Validation Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(4):1301–1310. doi:10.3233/JAD-17057229376854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sandelin A, Möller M. The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):338. doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0795-826546157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennergren D, Möller M. Implementation of the Swedish fracture register. Der Unfallchirurg. 2018;121(12):949–955. doi:10.1007/s00113-018-0538-z30178109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennergren D, Stjernstrom S, Moller M, Sundfeldt M, Ekholm C. Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):251. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1612-328601085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg J, Gelfand HM, Levy PS. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:210–220. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a0362247000537
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Appelros P, Terént A. Validation of the Swedish inpatient and cause-of-death registers in the context of stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;123(4):289–293. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01402.x21361878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köster M, Asplund K, Johansson Å, Stegmayr B. Refinement of Swedish administrative registers to monitor stroke events on the national level. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40(4):240–246. doi:10.1159/00034595323364278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rück C, Larsson KJ, Lind K, et al. Validity and reliability of chronic tic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder diagnoses in the Swedish national patient register. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007520. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Validation of data in the Norwegian arthroplasty register and the Norwegian patient register: 5134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(6):823–828. doi:10.1080/1745367051004543516470436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R, et al. Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health. 2012;34(1):138–148. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson M, Avina-Zubieta A, Lacaille D, Bernatsky S, Lix L, Jean S. The validity of administrative data to identify hip fractures is high–a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(3):278–285. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.10.00423347851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quach S, Blais C, Quan H. Administrative data have high variation in validity for recording heart failure. Can J Cardiol. 2010;26(8):306–312. doi:10.1016/S0828-282X(10)70438-420931099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomotaki A, Kumamaru H, Hashimoto H, et al. Evaluating the quality of data from the Japanese National Clinical Database 2011 via a comparison with regional government report data and medical charts. Surg Today. 2019;49(1):65–71. doi:10.1007/s00595-018-1700-530088123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emaus N, Heiberg I, Ahmed LA, et al. Methodological challenges in hip fracture registration: the harstad injury registry. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2011;18(2):135–142. doi:10.1080/17457300.2010.54033121432705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund R, Nurmi-Lüthje I, Lüthje P, Tanninen S, Narinen A, Keskimäki I. Comparing properties of audit data and routinely collected register data in case of performance assessment of hip fracture treatment in Finland. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(5):558–566. doi:10.1160/ME038217938779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedeborg R, Engquist H, Berglund L, Michaelsson K. Identification of incident injuries in hospital discharge registers. Epidemiology. 2008;19(6):860–867. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318181319e18938655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Ekelund J, Juto H, Sundfeldt M, Möller M. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish fracture register. Injury. 2018;49(11):2068–2074. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.00830220634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, Ekbom A. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):659–667. doi:10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y19504049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen M, Davidsen M, Rasmussen S, Abildstrom SZ, Osler M. The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(2):124–130. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00591-712654406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjertsen JE, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, et al. The Norwegian hip fracture register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(5):583–593. doi:10.1080/1745367081001658818839363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm JRC, Nauclér E, Vinblad J, Mohaddes M, Rolfson O. The Swedish hip arthroplasty register (Svenska höftprotesregistret). Annual Report 2018. Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/shpr/r/Arsrapport_2018_Hoftprotes_ENG_26mars_Final-rJepCXNsLI.pdf. Accessed 112, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer AC, Hedström M, Modig K. The Swedish hip fracture register and national patient register were valuable for research on hip fractures: comparison of two registers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;125:91–99. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.00332505739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertsson OW-DA, Lidgren L, Sundberg M. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register (Svenska Knäprotesregistret). Annual Report 2019. Available from: https://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2019_1.0_Eng.pdf. Accessed 112, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Chao A, Tsay PK, Lin SH, Shau WY, Chao DY. The applications of capture-recapture models to epidemiological data. Stat Med. 2001;20(20):3123–3157. doi:10.1002/sim.99611590637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittes JT, Colton T, Sidel VW. Capture-recapture methods for assessing the completeness of case ascertainment when using multiple information sources. J Chronic Dis. 1974;27(1):25–36. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(74)90005-84815069
   PubMedGoogle Scholar