Agreement Between Self-Reported Information and Administrative Data on Comorbidities, Imaging and Treatment in Denmark – A Validation Study of 38,745 Patients with Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis

References

• AlthubaitiA. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:211–217. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S10480727217764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KriegsmanDM, PenninxBW, van EijkJT, BoekeAJ, DeegDJ. Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients’ self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1407–1417. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00274-08970491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganini-HillA, ChaoA. Accuracy of recall of hip fracture, heart attack, and cancer: a comparison of postal survey data and medical records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(2):101–106. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a1168328342528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaapanenN, MiilunpaloS, PasanenM, OjaP, VuoriI. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records of chronic diseases in middle-aged and elderly Finnish men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(8):762–769. doi:10.1093/aje/145.8.7629126003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangW, DohertyM, PeatG, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):483–489. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.11310019762361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Great Britain). Osteoarthritis: care and management in adults. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schuh-RennerA, Canham-ChervakM, GrierTL, JonesBH. Accuracy of self-reported injuries compared to medical record data. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;39:39–44. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.00730472439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarlowSD, LinetMS. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records: the evidence for accuracy of recall. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(2):233–248. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a1151292643301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BushTL, MillerSR, GoldenAL, HaleWE. Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(11):1554–1556. doi:10.2105/AJPH.79.11.15542817172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuB, SweetlandS, BeralV, et al. Self-reported information on joint replacement and cholecystectomy agrees well with that in medical records. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(11):1190–1194. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.00717938062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SundbollJ, AdelborgK, MunchT, et al. Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012832. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JoensenAM, JensenMK, OvervadK, et al. Predictive values of acute coronary syndrome discharge diagnoses differed in the Danish National Patient Registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):188–194. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.00518722087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThomsenRW, LangeP, HellquistB, et al. Validity and underrecording of diagnosis of COPD in the Danish National Patient Registry. Respir Med. 2011;105(7):1063–1068. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.01.01221320769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LasotaAN, OvervadK, EriksenHH, TjonnelandA, SchmidtEB, GronholdtMM. Validity of peripheral arterial disease diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(5):679–685. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.12.03128187995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarchLM, SchwarzJM, CarfraeBH, BaggeE. Clinical validation of self-reported osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998;6(2):87–93. doi:10.1053/joca.1997.00989692063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RatzlaffC, KoehoornM, CibereJ, KopecJ. Clinical validation of an internet-based questionnaire for ascertaining hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(12):1568–1573. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.01722975023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShortME, GoetzelRZ, PeiX, et al. How accurate are self-reports? Analysis of self-reported health care utilization and absence when compared with administrative data. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(7):786–796. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a8667119528832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamoodR, HamoodH, MerhasinI, Keinan-BokerL. A feasibility study to assess the validity of administrative data sources and self-reported information of breast cancer survivors. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:50. doi:10.1186/s13584-016-0111-627980719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkouST, RoosEM. Good life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA: d™): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1439-y28173795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandenbrouckeJP, von ElmE, AltmanDG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):805–835. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318157751118049195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Health Authority. Knee osteoarthritis - national clinical guidelines and referral guidelines. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• LyngeE, SandegaardJL, ReboljM. The Danish national patient register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):30–33. doi:10.1177/140349481140148221775347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach KildemoesH, Toft SørensenH, HallasJ. The Danish national prescription registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7_suppl):38–41. doi:10.1177/140349481039471721775349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedersenCB. The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7_suppl):22–25. doi:10.1177/140349481038796521775345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtM, SchmidtSA, SandegaardJL, EhrensteinV, PedersenL, SorensenHT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9112526604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThygesenSK, ChristiansenCF, ChristensenS, LashTL, SørensenHT. The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):83. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-8321619668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NielsenLH, NørgaardBL, TilstedHH, et al. The Western Denmark cardiac computed tomography registry: a review and validation study. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:53.25657592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandisJR, KochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310843571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp LP. Stata statistical software: release 16. College Station, TX; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Guldberg-MøllerJ, CordtzRL, KristensenLE, DreyerL. Incidence and time trends of joint surgery in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a register-based time series and cohort study from Denmark. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(11):1517–1523. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-21531331300461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HjelholtTJ, EdwardsNM, VesteragerJD, KristensenPK, PedersenAB. The positive predictive value of hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the Danish multidisciplinary hip fracture registry and the Danish national patient registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:123–131. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S23872232099478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdelborgK, SundbollJ, MunchT, et al. Positive predictive value of cardiac examination, procedure and surgery codes in the Danish National Patient Registry: a population-based validation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e012817. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurcharthJ, LiljekvistMS, PommergaardH-C, RosenbergJ. Cumulative incidence and registry validation of groin hernia repair in a 34-year nationwide cohort. Dan Med J. 2016;63:A5284.27697133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkinsonL, CurryerC, GibberdA, CunichM, BylesJE. Good agreement between self-report and centralized hospitalizations data for arthritis-related surgeries. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(10):1128–1134. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.01223845185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HjertholmP, FlarupKR, GuldbrandtLM, VedstedP. The completeness of chest X-ray procedure codes in the Danish National Patient Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:151–156. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S12409128293121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaerskjoldA, HenriksenL, WayS, et al. The Danish National Prescription Registry in studies of a biological pharmaceutical: palivizumab - validation against two external data sources. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:305–312. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S7335526056490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi-BensoudaL, RossignolM, AubrunE, BenichouJ, AbenhaimL. Agreement between patients’ self‐report and physicians’ prescriptions on nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and other drugs used in musculoskeletal disorders: the international Pharmacoepidemiologic General Research eXtension database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(7):753–759. doi:10.1002/pds.319422315129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PottegardA, SchmidtSAJ, Wallach-KildemoesH, SorensenHT, HallasJ, SchmidtM. Data resource profile: the Danish National Prescription Registry. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(3):798–798f.27789670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NielsenMW, SøndergaardB, KjøllerM, HansenEH. Agreement between self-reported data on medicine use and prescription records vary according to method of analysis and therapeutic group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(9):919–924. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.02118468858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneeweissS, AvornJ. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(4):323–337. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.01215862718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkuraY, UrbanLH, MahoneyDW, JacobsenSJ, RodehefferRJ. Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(10):1096–1103. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.00515528061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChunH, KimIH, MinKD. Accuracy of self-reported hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia: analysis of a representative sample of Korean older adults. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016;7(2):108–115. doi:10.1016/j.phrp.2015.12.00227169009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LinauskasA, OvervadK, JohansenMB, Stengaard-PedersenK, de ThurahA. Positive predictive value of first-time rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses and their serological subtypes in the Danish National Patient Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1709–1720. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S17540630538575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KollerKR, WilsonAS, AsayED, MetzgerJS, NealDE. Agreement between self-report and medical record prevalence of 16 chronic conditions in the Alaska EARTH Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2014;5(3):160–165. doi:10.1177/215013191351790224399443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GruneirA, GriffithLE, FisherK, et al. Measuring multimorbidity series. An overlooked complexity-comparison of self-report vs. administrative data in community-living adults: paper 3. Measuring agreement across data sources and implications for estimating associations with health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;124:173–182.32353402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SusserSR, McCuskerJ, BelzileE. Comorbidity information in older patients at an emergency visit: self-report vs. administrative data had poor agreement but similar predictive validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):511–515. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.00918394546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar