Trends in Surgical Glaucoma Treatment in Germany Between 2006 and 2018

References

• Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, et al. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390(10108):2183–2193. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-128577860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.08122416488940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham Y-C, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.01324974815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Kass MA. What we have learned from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;189:xxiv–xxvii. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.02.01629501371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. 21st century glaucoma care. Eye. 2019;33(2):254–260. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0227-830305707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham EJ, Alexis D. Is newer necessarily better? The evolution of incisional glaucoma surgery over the last 100 years. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;191:xxv–xxix. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.04.00929655641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TC, Vanner EA, Parrish RK. Glaucoma surgery preferences when the surgeon adopts the role of the patient. Eye. 2019;1–7. doi:10.1038/s41433-019-0452-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(8):687. doi:10.1097/IJG.000000000000072028692597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr NM, Kumar HK, Crowston JG, Walland MJ. Glaucoma laser and surgical procedure rates in Australia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(12):1686–1691. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-30799426969712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AM, Mariet A-S, Benzenine E, et al. Trends in operating room-based glaucoma procedures in France from 2005 to 2014: a Nationwide Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(11):1500–1504. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-30994628292777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa-Breda J, Gonçalves-Pinho M, Santos JV, et al. Trends in glaucoma surgical procedures in Portugal: a 16-Year Nationwide Study (2000–2015). J Glaucoma. 2018;27(8):682–686. doi:10.1097/IJG.000000000000101129952819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy C, Ogston S, Cobb C, MacEwen C. Recent trends in glaucoma surgery in Scotland, England and Wales. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(3):308–312. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-30446525208548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang SJ, Wenzel M, Böhringer D, Reinhard T. Systematische Analyse der Krankenhausqualitätsberichte im Hinblick auf die Versorgung der Bevölkerung mit Kataraktoperationen. [Systematic analysis of the annual quality reports of the Federal Joint Committee with regard to cataract surgery]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2014;231(11):1115–1119. German. doi:10.1055/s-0034-138306725340376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher F, Daniel MC, Böhringer D, et al. [Scleral buckling surgery in Germany for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a spirit of the past or current practice?]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020;237(6):780–786. German. doi:10.1055/a-1078-137832016939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Reinhard T, Lang SJ. [The role of hospitals in the treatment of patients with cataract in germany: systematic analysis of the quality reports of German hospitals for the years 2006 to 2016]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019;236(8):964–968. German. doi:10.1055/a-0838-573431049911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Lapp T, et al. [Keratoplasty in Germany: systematic analysis of the quality reports of German hospitals between 2006 and 2017]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020. German. doi:10.1055/a-1035-9442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EGS. European Glaucoma Society Guidelines. 5th ed. 2021. Available from: https://www.eugs.org/eng/guidelines.asp. Accessed June 28, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2021. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed June 28, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Szigiato A-A, Trope GE, Jin Y, Buys YM. Trends in glaucoma surgical procedures in Ontario: 1992–2012. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(5):338–344. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.07.00526455967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan BC, O’Leary N, AlMobarak FA, et al. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography–derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):535–543. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.05523265804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVience E, McMillan BD, Gross RL. Screening for Primary Open-angle Glaucoma (POAG). Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2018;58(3):1–9. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000227
   Google Scholar
• Day AC, Baio G, Gazzard G, et al. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in European derived populations: a systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(9):1162–1167. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-30118922653314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Jiang Y, Huang S, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1609–1618. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32607-230878226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latina MA, Sibayan SA, Shin DH, et al. Q-switched 532-nm Nd: yAGlaser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clinical study11Dr. Mark A. Latina has financial interest in this technology. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(11):2082–2090. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91129-09818610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar M, Ogunyomade A, O’Brart DPS, et al. A randomised, prospective study comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty with latanoprost for the control of intraocular pressure in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(11):1413–1417. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.05279516234442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1505–1516. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X30862377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou J, Turalba A, Hoguet A. Surgical innovations in glaucoma: the transition from trabeculectomy to MIGS. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2017;17.
   Google Scholar
• Fingeret M, Dickerson JE. The role of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery devices in the management of glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(2):155–162. doi:10.1097/OPX.000000000000117329370021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, et al. Efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of standalone Ab interno gelatin microstent implantation versus standalone trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(11):1579–1588. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.00428601250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basílio AL, Moura-Coelho N, Passos I, et al. XEN® implant and trabeculectomy medium-term quality of life assessment and comparison of results. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(12):1941–1944. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.12.1130588427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos Parra MT, Salinas López JA, López Grau NS, et al. XEN implant device versus trabeculectomy, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(8):1741–1750. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04341-y31093766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar