Considerations for Using Multiple Imputation in Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis – A Tutorial with Applied Example

References

• Eiset AH, Aoun MP, Stougaard M, et al. The association between long-distance migration and PTSD prevalence in Syrian refugees. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:363. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03982-4
   Google Scholar
• Mollica RF, Caspi-Yavin Y, Bollini P, Truong T, Tor S, Lavelle JW. The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire: validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. J Nerv. 1992;180(2):111–116. doi:10.1097/00005053-199202000-00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Stürmer T. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(12):1149–1156. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661–3679. doi:10.1002/sim.6607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SR, Hernán MA. Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(6):656–664. doi:10.1093/aje/kwn164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis. Stat Med. 2016;35(30):5642–5655. doi:10.1002/sim.7084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KCG, Yam SCP, Zhang Z. Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2016;78(3):673–700. doi:10.1111/rssb.12129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2000;11(5):550–560. doi:10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BK, Lessler J, Stuart EA. Weight trimming and propensity score weighting. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e18174. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman SR, Galati J, Jackson D, Carlin J. What is meant by “missing at random”? Stat Sci. 2013;28(2):257–268. doi:10.1214/13-STS415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Inference and missing data. Biometrika. 1976;63(3):581–592. doi:10.2307/2335739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little RJA. Regression with Missing X’s: a review. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992;87(420):1227–1237. doi:10.2307/2290664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91(434):473–489. doi:10.2307/2291635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393–b2393. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett JW, Seaman SR, White IR, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: accommodating the substantive model. Stat Methods Med Res. 2015;24(4):462–487. doi:10.1177/0962280214521348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman SR, Bartlett JW, White IR. Multiple imputation of missing covariates with non-linear effects and interactions: an evaluation of statistical methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:46. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett JW, Keogh R Smcfcs: multiple imputation of covariates by substantive model compatible fully conditional specification.; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=smcfcs. Accessed June 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett JW, Morris TP. Multiple imputation of covariates by substantive-model compatible fully conditional specification. Stata J Promot Commun Stat Stata. 2015;15(2):437–456. doi:10.1177/1536867X1501500206
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett JW, Hughes RA. Bootstrap inference for multiple imputation under uncongeniality and misspecification. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020;29:3533–3546. doi:10.1177/0962280220932189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomaker M, Heumann C. Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation. Stat Med. 2018;37(14):2252–2266. doi:10.1002/sim.7654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman SR, White I. Inverse probability weighting with missing predictors of treatment assignment or missingness. Commun Stat - Theory Methods. 2014;43(16):3499–3515. doi:10.1080/03610926.2012.700371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray JS. Multiple imputation: a review of practical and theoretical findings. Stat Sci. 2018;33(2):142–159. doi:10.1214/18-STS644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7(1):1–26. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med. 2000;19(9):1141–1164. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083–3107. doi:10.1002/sim.3697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyrat C, Seaman SR, White IR, et al. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: how should multiple imputation be used? Stat Methods Med Res. 2019;28(1):3–19. doi:10.1177/0962280217713032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning de Vries BBL, Groenwold RH. A comparison of two approaches to implementing propensity score methods following multiple imputation. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2017;14(4). doi:10.2427/12630
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed June 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Greifer N WeightIt: weighting for covariate balance in observational studies; 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WeightIt. Accessed June 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Greifer N Cobalt: covariate balance tables and plots; 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cobalt. Accessed June 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Canty A, Ripley B Boot: bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan D, Dancho M Furrr: apply mapping functions in parallel using futures.; 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=furrr. Accessed June 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4(43):1686. doi:10.21105/joss.01686
   Google Scholar
• Harrell F. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. 2nd. Springer International Publishing; 2015. https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783319194240. Accessed February 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Austin PC, Stuart EA. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26:1654–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahamyirou A, Blais L, Forget A, Schnitzer ME. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019;28(6):1637–1650. doi:10.1177/0962280218772065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning de Vries BBL, Smeden M, Van Groenwold RHH. Propensity score estimation using classification and regression trees in the presence of missing covariate data. Epidemiol Med. 2018;7(1). doi:10.1515/em-2017-0020
   Google Scholar
• Qu Y, Lipkovich I. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach. Stat Med. 2009;28(9):1402–1414. doi:10.1002/sim.3549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel PT, Bartlett JW. Maximum likelihood multiple imputation: faster imputations and consistent standard errors without posterior draws. ArXiv12100870 Stat. 2019;36:400–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar