139
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors – Validity of Self-Report versus Plasma Concentrations and Pharmacy Dispensations – A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 815-826 | Published online: 30 Jun 2022

References

  • Boudreau DM, Daling JR, Malone KE, Gardner JS, Blough DK, Heckbert SR. A validation study of patient interview data and pharmacy records for antihypertensive, statin, and antidepressant medication use among older women. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(3):308–317. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh038
  • Rauma PH, Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Kroger H, Tuppurainen MT, Kauhanen J, Honkanen RJ. The relationship between self-reported and registry-based data on use of psychoactive medications in postmenopausal women. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:180. doi:10.1186/1471-244x-13-180
  • van Gelder MMHJ, van Rooij IALM, de Walle HEK, Roeleveld N, Bakker MK. Maternal recall of prescription medication use during pregnancy using a paper-based questionnaire.Drug Safety. 2013;36(1):43–54. doi:10.1007/s40264-012-0004-8
  • Hafferty JD, Campbell AI, Navrady LB, et al. Self-reported medication use validated through record linkage to national prescribing data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;94:132–142. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.013
  • Nielsen MW, Søndergaard B, Kjøller M, Hansen EH. Agreement between self-reported data on medicine use and prescription records vary according to method of analysis and therapeutic group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(9):919–924. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.021
  • Haapea M, Miettunen J, Lindeman S, Joukamaa M, Koponen H. Agreement between self-reported and pharmacy data on medication use in the Northern Finland 1966 birth cohort. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(2):88–96. doi:10.1002/mpr.304
  • Sediq R, van der Schans J, Dotinga A, et al. Concordance assessment of self-reported medication use in the Netherlands three-generation Lifelines Cohort study with the pharmacy database iaDB.nl: the PharmLines initiative. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:981–989. doi:10.2147/clep.S163037
  • Gnjidic D, Du W, Pearson S-A, Hilmer S, Banks E. Ascertainment of self-reported prescription medication use compared with pharmaceutical claims data. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(4):e27341702. doi:10.17061/phrp27341702
  • Richardson K, Kenny RA, Peklar J, Bennett K. Agreement between patient interview data on prescription medication use and pharmacy records in those aged older than 50 years varied by therapeutic group and reporting of indicated health conditions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(11):1308–1316. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.016
  • Waaseth M, Bakken K, Dumeaux V, et al. Hormone replacement therapy use and plasma levels of sex hormones in the Norwegian women and cancer postgenome cohort - a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Women’s Health. 2008;8(1):1. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-1
  • Lund E, Dumeaux V, Braaten T, et al. Cohort profile: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study - NOWAC - Kvinner og kreft. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(1):36–41. doi:10.1093/ije/dym137
  • The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) [updated April 2021]. The Norwegian institute of public health; 2021. Available from: http://www.norpd.no/. Accessed June 20, 2022.
  • Note for guidance on validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology (CPMP/ICH/381/95); 1995. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q2-r1-validation-analytical-procedures-text-methodology. Accessed June 20, 2022. 
  • ATC/DDD Index. The WHO collaborating centre for drug statistics methodology. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Available from: http://www.whocc.no/atcddd/. Accessed June 1, 2018.
  • Lau HS, de Boer A, Beuning KS, Porsius A. Validation of pharmacy records in drug exposure assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(5):619–625. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00040-1
  • VassarStats: website for statistical computation. clinical calculator 1. Available from: http://vassarstats.net/clin1.html. Accessed April 29, 2022.
  • VassarStats: Website for Statistical Computation. Kappa as a mea- sure of concordance in categorical sorting. Available from: http://vassarstats.net/kappa.html. Accessed April 29, 2022.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Skurtveit S, Selmer R, Odsbu I, Handal M. Self-reported data on medicine use in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study compared to data from the Norwegian prescription database. Norwegian J Epidemiol. 2014;24(1–2):209–216.
  • Eiliv L, Merethe K, Tonje B, et al. External validity in a population-based national prospective study–the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14(10):1001–1008. doi:10.1023/B:CACO.0000007982.18311.2e
  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj. Accessed June 20, 2022.