References
- EdenJLevitLBergAMortonSFinding What Works in Health Care: Standards For Systematic ReviewsWashington, DCThe National Academies Press2011
- ChalmersIGlasziouPAvoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceLancet20093749683868919525005
- BarkerFHVealDCWyattBKComparative efficiency of searching titles, abstracts, and index terms in a free-text data baseJ Doc19722812236
- Cochrane Style Guide. 4.1 EditionThe Cochrane Collaboration2010 Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Cochrane-Style-Guide_4-1-edition.pdfAccessed Feb 23, 2013
- KamdarBBTergasAIMateenFJBhayaniNHOhJNight-shift work and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisBreast Cancer Re Treat2013212 [Epub ahead of print]
- CohenAMHershWRPetersonKYenPReducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classificationJ Am Med Inform Assoc200613220621916357352
- WallaceBCTrikalinosTALauJBroadleyCSchmidCHSemi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviewsBMC Bioinformatics2010115520102628
- Vera-BadilloFEShapiroROcanaAAmirETannockIFBias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancerAnn Oncol Epub January 9, 2013
- SampsonMBarrowmanNJMoherDCan electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical studyBMC Med Res Method200667
- DickersinKRennieDThe evolution of trial registries and their use to assess the clinical trial enterpriseJAMA2012307171861186422550202