Comparison of survival outcomes between radical hysterectomy and definitive radiochemotherapy in stage IB1 and IIA1 cervical cancer

References

• JemalABrayFCenterMMGlobal cancer statisticsCA Cancer J Clin2011612699021296855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TorreLASiegelRLWardEMGlobal cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends – an updateCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2016251162726667886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioliRLopezSAloisiATen years of HPV vaccines: state of art and controversiesCrit Rev Oncol Hematol2016102657227066937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioliRLuveroDAloisiAAdjuvant chemotherapy after primary treatments for cervical cancer: a critical point of view and review of the literatureExpert Rev Anticancer Ther201414443143924483847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuveroDPlottiFAloisiAPatients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + radical surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: long-term outcomes, survival and prognostic factors in a single-center 10-year follow-upMed Oncol2016331011027577931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioliRPlottiFAloisiAA randomized controlled trial comparing four versus six courses of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients previously treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgeryGynecol Oncol2015139343343826428942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuSGZhangWWSunJYLiFYHeZYZhouJMultimodal treatment including hysterectomy improves survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched analysisInt J Surg20174812212729032160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioliRPlottiFLuveroDFeasibility and safety of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a pilot studyTumour Biol20143532741274624234333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Cervical cancer. 2017. (version 1). Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2017
   Google Scholar
• BrewsterWRMonkBJZiogasAIntent-to-treat analysis of stage Ib and IIa cervical cancer in the United States: radiotherapy or surgery 1988–1995Obstet Gynecol200197224825411165590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BansalNHerzogTJShawREPrimary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiationAm J Obstet Gynecol20092015485.e1e919879394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira-RodriguesAFerreiraCGBergmannAComparison of adenocarcinoma (ACA) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix in a sub-optimally screened cohort: a population-based epidemiologic study of 51,842 women in BrazilGynecol Oncol2014135229229625130677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandoniFManeoAColomboARandomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancerLancet199735090775355409284774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaqueWVermaVFakhreddineMAddition of chemotherapy to definitive radiotherapy for IB1 and IIA1 cervical cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Data BaseGynecol Oncol20171441283327784533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2016 Sub (1973–2014 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969–2015 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2017, based on the November 2016 submission. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/data. Accessed May 25, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• RosenbaumPRRubinDBConstructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity scoreAm Stat19853913338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AustinPCAn introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studiesMultivariate Behav Res201146339942421818162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeysHMBundyBNStehmanFBCisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinomaN Engl J Med1999340151154116110202166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorrisMEifelPJLuJPelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancerN Engl J Med1999340151137114310202164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosePGBundyBNWatkinsEBConcurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancerN Engl J Med1999340151144115310202165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitneyCWSauseWBundyBNRandomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group studyJ Clin Oncol19991751339134810334517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersWA3rdLiuPYBarrettRJ2ndConcurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervixJ Clin Oncol20001881606161310764420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandoniFColomboAMilaniRRandomized study between radical surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: 20-year updateJ Gynecol Oncol2017283e3428382797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamashitaHNakagawaKTagoMComparison between conventional surgery and radiotherapy for FIGO stage I-II cervical carcinoma: a retrospective Japanese studyGynecol Oncol200597383483915894366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DollKDonnellyEHelenowksiITreatment of stage IB1 cervix cancer: comparison of radical hysterectomy and radiationGynecol Oncol20111232444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangYTWangCCTsaiCSLong-term outcome and prognostic factors for adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapyInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys201180242943620542643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosePGJavaJJWhitneyCWLocally advanced adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix in gynecologic oncology group trials of cisplatin-based chemoradiationGynecol Oncol2014135220821225152438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenJLHuangCYHuangYSDifferential clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapyActa Obstet Gynecol Scand201493766166824666257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhouJZhangWWWuSGThe prognostic value of histologic subtype in node-positive early-stage cervical cancer after hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapyInt J Surg2017441628583891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhouJWuSGSunJYComparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysisJ Cancer Res Clin Oncol2017143111512227646608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WagnerAJhingranAGaffneyDIntensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecologic cancers: hope, hype or hyperbole?Gynecol Oncol2013130122923623632209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar