Do additional cores from cancer-suspicious lesions on transrectal ultrasound improve prostate cancer detection including index tumors over 12-core systematic biopsy?

References

• SarmaAVSchottenfeldDProstate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States: 1981–2001Semin Urol Oncol20022013911828352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FinkKGSchmidHPParasLSchmellerNTProstate biopsy in Central Europe: results of a survey of indication, patient preparation and biopsy techniqueUrol Int2007791606617627171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TerrisMKFreihaFSMcNealJEStameyTAEfficacy of transrectal ultrasound for identification of clinically undetected prostate cancerJ Urol1991146178831711589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RietbergenJBKranseRKirkelsWJDe KoningHJSchroderFHEvaluation of prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in population-based screening for prostate cancer: improving the efficiency of early detectionBr J Urol199779Suppl 257639126071
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KranseRBeemsterboerPRietbergenJPredictors for biopsy outcome in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam region)Prostate199939431632210344223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeemsterboerPMKranseRde KoningHJHabbemaJDSchroderFHChanging role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam)Int J Cancer199984443744110404100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LittrupPJBaileySEProstate cancer: the role of transrectal ultrasound and its impact on cancer detection and managementRadiol Clin North Am20003818711310664668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeijminkSWvan MoerkerkHKiemeneyLAA comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancerEur Radiol200616492793816391907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VoTRifkinMDPetersTLShould ultrasound criteria of the prostate be redefined to better evaluate when and where to biopsyUltrasound Q200117317117612973073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ShinoharaKWheelerTMScardinoPTThe appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinationsJ Urol1989142176822659828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DurkanGCGreeneDRDiagnostic dilemmas in detection of prostate cancer in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostateProstate Cancer Prostatic Dis200031132012497156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoobolMJSchroderFHThe European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC): rationale, structure and preliminary results 1994–2003BJU Int200392Suppl 21124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ProrokPCAndrioleGLBresalierRSDesign of the Prostate, Lung,Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening TrialControl Clin Trials200021Suppl 6273S309S11189684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AbdollahFKarnesRJSuardiNPredicting survival of patients with node-positive prostate cancer following multimodal treatmentEur Urol201465355456224094576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalpernEJRameyJRStrupSEDetection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imagingCancer2005104112373238316240450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrestiJCJrO’DowdGJMillerMCMattuRVeltriRWExtended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice studyJ Urol2003169112512912478119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StewartCSLeibovichBCWeaverALLieberMMProstate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsiesJ Urol20011661869111435830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevineMAIttmanMMelamedJLeporHTwo consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancerJ Urol199815924714759649265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VashiARWojnoKJGillespieBOesterlingJEA model for the number of cores per prostate biopsy based on patient age and prostate glandJ Urol199815939209249474183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GosselaarCRoobolMJRoemelingSThe value of an additional hypoechoic lesion-directed biopsy core for detecting prostate cancerBJU Int2008101668569018291017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlaniganRCCatalonaWJRichieJPAccuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancerJ Urol19941525 Pt 1150615097523707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarterHBHamperUMShethSEvaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancerJ Urol19891424100810102677409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MullinsJKBonekampDLandisPMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings in men with low-risk prostate cancer followed using active surveillanceBJU Int201311171037104523464904
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ParkBHJeonHGChooSHRole of multiparametric 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillanceBJU Int2014113686487024053308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OnurRLittrupPJPontesJEBiancoFJJrContemporary impact of transrectal ultrasound lesions for prostate cancer detectionJ Urol2004172251251415247717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HammererPHulandHSystematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients referred for prostate evaluationJ Urol19941511991027504750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VallancienGPrapotnichDVeillonBBrissetJMAndre-BougaranJSystematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examinationJ Urol19911465130813121719243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScattoniVMaccagnanoCZanniGIs extended and saturation biopsy necessary?Int J Urol201017543244720415706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NorbergMEgevadLHolmbergLThe sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancerUrology19975045625669338732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar