Prognostic value of ductal carcinoma in situ component in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

References

• PinderSEEllisIOThe diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)–current definitions and classificationBreast Cancer Res20035525425712927035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongHLauSYauTCheungPEpsteinRJPresence of an in situ component is associated with reduced biological aggressiveness of size-matched invasive breast cancerBr J Cancer201010291391139620424617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DieterichMHartwigFStubertJAccompanying DCIS in breast cancer patients with invasive ductal carcinoma is predictive of improved local recurrence-free survivalBreast201423434635124559611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimJYHanWMoonHGGrade of ductal carcinoma in situ accompanying infiltrating ductal carcinoma as an independent prognostic factorClin Breast Cancer201313538539123870857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChagparABMcMastersKMSahooSEdwardsMJDoes ductal carcinoma in situ accompanying invasive carcinoma affect prognosis?Surgery20091464561567 discussion 567–56819789013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JoBHChunYKHeterogeneity of invasive ductal carcinoma: proposal for a hypothetical classificationJ Korean Med Sci200621346045816778390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DzierzanowskiMMelvilleKABarnesPJMacIntoshRFCainesJSPorterGADuctal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy marginsJ Surg Oncol2005902717615844190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LogulloAFGodoyABMourão-NetoMSimpsonAJNishimotoINBrentaniMMPresence of ductal carcinoma in situ confers an improved prognosis for patients with T1N0M0 invasive breast carcinomaBraz J Med Biol Res200235891391912185383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YiuCCLooWTLamCKChowLWPresence of extensive intraductal component in patients undergoing breast conservative surgery predicts presence of residual disease in subsequent completion mastectomyChin Med J (Engl)2009122890090519493411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HollandRConnollyJLGelmanRThe presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breastJ Clin Oncol1990811131182153190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeongASSormunenRTVinyuvatSHamdaniRWSuthipintawongCBiologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ and concurrent infiltrating carcinoma. A comparison of eight contemporary grading systemsAm J Clin Pathol2001115570971811345835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WärnbergFNordgrenHBergkvistLHolmbergLTumour markers in breast carcinoma correlate with grade rather than with invasivenessBr J Cancer200185686987411556839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinmanSWangJBournePYangQTangPExpression of cytokeratin markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR in pure ductal carcinomain situ (DCIS) and DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breastAnn Clin Lab Sci200737212713417522367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchorrMCPedriniJLSavarisRFZettlerCGAre the pure in situ breast ductal carcinomas and those associated with invasive carcinoma the same?Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol2010181515419568168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IakovlevVVArnesonNCWongVGenomic differences between pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and that associated with invasive disease: a calibrated aCGH studyClin Cancer Res200814144446445418628458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AubeleMMattisAZitzelsbergerHExtensive ductal carcinoma In situ with small foci of invasive ductal carcinoma: evidence of genetic resemblance by CGHInt J Cancer2000851828610585588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CastroNPOsórioCATorresCEvidence that molecular changes in cells occur before morphological alterations during the progression of breast ductal carcinomaBreast Cancer Res2008105R8718928525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarentszMWPostmaELvan DalenTPrediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancerEur J Surg Oncol201541110611225228054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JimenezREBongersSBouwmanDSegelMVisscherDWClinicopathologic significance of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies with invasive cancerAm J Surg Pathol200024112312810632496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinnHPAntonHWMagenerAvon FournierDBastertGOttoHFExtensive and predominant in situ component in breast carcinoma: their influence on treatment results after breast-conserving therapyEur J Cancer19983456466539713268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CedoliniCBertozziSLonderoAPImpact of the presence and quantity of ductal carcinoma in situ component on the outcome of invasive breast cancerInt J Clin Exp Pathol2015810133041331326722534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlackMMZachrauREHankeyBFFeuerEJPrognostic significance of in situ carcinoma associated with invasive breast carcinoma. A natural experiment in cancer immunology?Cancer19967847787888756372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence–SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2016 Sub 1973–2014 varying)–Linked To County Attributes–Total U.S., 1969–2015 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2017, based on the November 2016 submission. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/data. Accessed May 25, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• RosenbaumPRRubinDBConstructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity scoreAm Stat19853913338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsonEJ1ForbesAIntroduction to propensity scoresRespirology201419562563524889820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimDHPieperCFAhmedAColón-EmericCSUse and interpretation of propensity scores in aging research: a guide for clinical researchersJ Am Geriatr Soc201664102065207327550392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AustinPCAn introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studiesMultivariate Behav Res201146339942421818162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatsukumaAEnjojiMToyoshimaSDuctal carcinoma of the breast. An analysis of proportions of intraductal and invasive componentsPathol Res Pract1991187162671851298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchnittSJHarrisJREvolution of breast-conserving therapy for localized breast cancerJ Clin Oncol20082691395139618349387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrookhartMASchneeweissSRothmanKJGlynnRJAvornJStürmerTVariable selection for propensity score modelsAm J Epidemiol2006163121149115616624967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JungWKangEKimSMFactors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancerJ Breast Cancer201215441241923346170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar