Comparison of prognostic prediction between nomogram based on lymph node ratio and AJCC 8th staging system for patients with resected pancreatic head carcinoma: a SEER analysis

References

• SiegelRLMillerKDJemalACancer statistics, 2017CA Cancer J Clin201767173028055103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenWZhengRBaadePDCancer statistics in China, 2015CA Cancer J Clin201666211513226808342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuNLvYZhaoGSurvival prediction in pancreatic cancer patients with no distant metastasis: a large-scale population-based estimateFuture Oncol201714216517529226705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KamarajahSKBurnsWRFrankelTLChoCSNathanHValidation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) analysisAnn Surg Oncol20172472023203028213792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllenPJKukDCastilloCFMulti-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomaAnn Surg2017265118519127163957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuNGaoSXuYAlkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic indicator in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after curative resectionJ Cancer20178163362337029158809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergerACWatsonJCRossEAHoffmanJPThe metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinomaAm Surg2004703235240 Discussion 24015055847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TolJABrosensLAvan DierenSImpact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancerBr J Surg2015102323724525529117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElshaerMGravanteGKosminMRiazAAl-BahraniAA systematic review of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaAnn R Coll Surg Engl201799210110627869496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhanHXXuJWWangLZhangGYHuSYLymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor for patients after resection of pancreatic cancerWorld J Surg Oncol20151310525888902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamamotoYIkomaHMorimuraRThe clinical impact of the lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancerAnticancer Res20143452389239424778048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JiFFuSJGuoZYPrognostic value of combined preoperative lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaMedicine (Baltimore)20169527e406527399091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaymanTJStromTSpringettGMOutcomes of resected pancreatic cancer in patients age ≥70J Gastrointest Oncol20156549850426487943
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RochefortMMAnkenyJSKaderaBEImpact of tumor grade on pancreatic cancer prognosis: validation of a novel TNMG staging systemAnn Surg Oncol201320134322432923943022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuZQXiaoZWLuoGPEffect of the number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on prognosis of patients after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinomaHepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int201413663464125475867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValsangkarNPBushDMMichaelsonJSN0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaJ Gastrointest Surg201317225726623229885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JangJYKangMJHeoJSA prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancerAnn Surg2014259465666424368638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AshfaqAPockajBAGrayRJHalfdanarsonTRWasifNNodal counts and lymph node ratio impact survival after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinomaJ Gastrointest Surg201418111929193524916590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WentzSCZhaoZGShyrYLymph node ratio and preoperative CA 19–9 levels predict overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinomaWorld J Gastrointest Oncol201241020721523444312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithBJMezhirJJAn interactive Bayesian model for prediction of lymph node ratio and survival in pancreatic cancer patientsJ Am Med Inform Assoc201421e2e203e21124444460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OrciLAMeyerJCombescureCA meta-analysis of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing pancre-atoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinomaHPB (Oxford)201517756557225913578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IgnjatovicIKnezevicSKnezevicDStandard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical surgical treatment for pancreatic head carcinomaJ BUON201722123223828365959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeYSKimHKimHWHigh expression of MicroRNA-196a indicates poor prognosis in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorMedicine (Baltimore)20159450e222426683934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShiraiYShibaHHarukiKPreoperative platelet-to-albumin ratio predicts prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreatic resectionAnticancer Res201737278779328179331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-UserosJGeorgiev-HristovTFernandez-AceneroMJUNR/CDSE1 expression as prognosis biomarker in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: a proof-of-conceptPLoS One2017128e018204428763470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JingCYFuYPShenHJAlbumin to gamma-glutamyltransferase ratio as a prognostic indicator in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resectionOncotarget201788132931330328076328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AsanoTYamadaSFujiiTThe Charlson age comorbidity index predicts prognosis in patients with resected pancreatic cancerInt J Surg20173916917528161529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar