Comparison of totally laparoscopic and open approach in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy – systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• FerlayJPartenskyCBrayFMore deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017Acta Oncol20165591011581160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoburnNCosbyRKleinLStaging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: a clinical practice guidelineCurr Oncol201724532433129089800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association JGCJapanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3)Gastric Cancer201114211312321573742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KitanoSIsoYMoriyamaMSugimachiKLaparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomySurg Laparosc Endosc1994421461488180768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XiongJJNunesQMHuangWLaparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysisWorld J Gastroenterol201319448114813224307808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StrongVESongKYParkCHComparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogramAnn Surg2010251464064620224369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HurHLeeHYLeeHJEfficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trialBMC Cancer20151535525939684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaverkampLBrenkmanHJSeesingMFLaparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)BMC Cancer20151555626219670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDGGroup PPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementInt J Surg20108533634120171303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StroupDFBerlinJAMortonSCMeta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) groupJAMA2000283152008201210789670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HozoSPDjulbegovicBHozoIEstimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sampleBMC Med Res Methodol200551315840177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DulucqJLWintringerPStabiliniCSolinasLPerissatJMahajnaALaparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: a prospective comparative studySurg Endosc200519793393815920691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TopalBLeysEEctorsNAertsRPenninckxFDeterminants of complications and adequacy of surgical resection in laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for adenocarcinomaSurg Endosc200822498098417690934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimHSKimBSLeeISLeeSYookJHComparison of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancerJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201323432333123379920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuJHuangCMZhengCHShort- and Long-Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients: a Propensity Score-Matched AnalysisJ Gastrointest Surg201519111949195726268957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamagemCALinharesMLacerdaCFBertulucciPAWonrathDde OliveiraATComparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancerArq Bras Cir Dig20152816569
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LuYJiangBLiuTLaparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma: a matched pair analysisJ BUON201621490390827685912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShuBLeiSLiFHuaSChenYHuoZLaparoscopic total gastrectomy compared with open resection for gastric carcinoma: a case-matched study with long-term follow-upJ BUON201621110110727061537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuHLiWChenGOutcome of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinomaJ BUON201621360360827569080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenKPanYCaiJQXuXWWuDMouYPTotally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgeryWorld J Gastroenterol20142042158671587825400474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoburnNCosbyRKleinLStaging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: A systematic reviewCancer Treat Rev20186310411529275224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JeongOJungMRParkYKRyuSYSafety and feasibility during the initial learning process of intracorporeal Billroth I (delta-shaped) anastomosis for laparoscopic distal gastrectomySurg Endosc20152961522152925294524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JeongORyuSYChoiWYPiaoZParkYKRisk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinomaAnn Surg Oncol20142192994300124687152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der PasMHHaglindECuestaMALaparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trialLancet Oncol201314321021823395398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KennedyRHFrancisEAWhartonRMulticenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROLJ Clin Oncol201432171804181124799480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedziwiatrMMalczakPMizeraMThere is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomesTech Coloproctol201721859560428795243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimWKimHHHanSUDecreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01)Ann Surg20162631283526352529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuYHuangCSunYMorbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled TrialJ Clin Oncol201634121350135726903580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KataiHMizusawaJKatayamaHShort-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912Gastric Cancer201720469970827718137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuXZhangDLinEPreoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric CancerBMC Cancer201818169929954375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeJYKimHIKimYNClinical Significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Predicting Short- and Long-Term Surgical Outcomes After Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of 7781 Gastric Cancer PatientsMedicine (Baltimore)20169518e353927149460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MałczakPPisarskaMPiotrMWysockiMBudzyńskiAPędziwiatrMEnhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisObes Surg201727122623527817086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeevaratnamRBocicariuACardosoRA meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 lymph node dissectionGastric Cancer201215Suppl 1S606922138927
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MocellinSNittiDLymphadenectomy extent and survival of patients with gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event data from randomized trialsCancer Treat Rev201541544845425814393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-SedfyADixonMSeevaratnamRPersonalized Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 LymphadenectomyAnn Surg Oncol20152261820182725348779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TokunagaMOhyamaSHikiNFukunagaTAikouSYamaguchiTCan superextended lymph node dissection be justified for gastric cancer with pathologically positive para-aortic lymph nodes?Ann Surg Oncol20101782031203620182811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SasakoMSanoTYamamotoSD2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancerN Engl J Med2008359545346218669424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de SteurWOHartgrinkHHDikkenJLPutterHvan de VeldeCJQuality control of lymph node dissection in the Dutch Gastric Cancer TrialBr J Surg2015102111388139326313463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenXZWenLRuiYYLong-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisMedicine (Baltimore)2015944e45425634185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrecoMCaprettiGBerettaLGemmaMPecorelliNBragaMEnhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsWorld J Surg20143861531154124368573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatlokMPedziwiatrMMajorPKlekSBudzynskiPMalczakPOne hundred seventy-nine consecutive bariatric operations after introduction of protocol inspired by the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) in bariatric surgeryMed Sci Monit20152179179725779669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedziwiatrMKisialeuskiMWierdakMEarly implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) protocol - Compliance improves outcomes: A prospective cohort studyInt J Surg201521758126231994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedziwiatrMMatlokMKisialeuskiMEnhanced recovery (ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic total gastrectomyWideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne20149225225725097695
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EtohTInomataMWatanabeMSuccess rate of informed consent acquisition and factors influencing participation in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage II/III colon cancer in Japan (JCOG0404)Asian J Endosc Surg20158441942326176956
   PubMedGoogle Scholar