Determining the optimal cutoff point for lymph node density and its impact on overall survival in children with Wilms’ tumor

References

• DavidoffAMWilms’ tumorCurr Opin Pediatr200921335736419417665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FriedmanADWilms tumorPediatr Rev2013347328330 discussion 33023818087
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CottonCAPetersonSNorkoolPATakashimaJGrigorievYBreslowNEEarly and late mortality after diagnosis of Wilms tumorJ Clin Oncol20092781304130919139431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouHYangJLiuQThe impact of the lymph node density on overall survival in patients with Wilms’ tumor: a SEER analysisCancer Manag Res20181067167729670401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SaltzmanAFCarrascoAJrAminiAPatterns of lymph node sampling and the impact of lymph node density in favorable histology Wilms tumor: an analysis of the National cancer databaseJ Pediatr Urol2018142161.e1161.e829133167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CampRLDolled-FilhartMRimmDLX-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimizationClin Cancer Res200410217252725915534099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiSQJiangYHLinJAlbumin-to-fibrinogen ratio as a promising biomarker to predict clinical outcome of non-small cell lung cancer individualsCancer Med2018741221123129533009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenXDengYShiYLoss of expression rather than cytoplasmic mislocalization of RUNX3 predicts worse outcome in non-small cell lung cancerOncol Lett20181545043505529545901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanCWangXChenWReevaluation of glypican-3 as a prognostic marker in HCC using X-tile softwareMed Oncol201532135925432695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Comprehensive R Archive NetworkAn introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART Routines2018 Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/vignettes/longintro.pdfAccessed February 23, 2018
   Google Scholar
• RauCSWuSCChienPCPrediction of mortality in patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage using a decision tree classifier: a retrospective analysis based on a trauma registry systemInt J Environ Res Public Health20171411E142029165330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DialloJSAldejmahAMouhimAFNoxa and Puma expression add to clinical markers in predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer patients in a survival tree modelClin Cancer Res200713237044705218056181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeagertyPJLumleyTPepeMSTime-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic markerBiometrics200056233734410877287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoudenWJIndex for rating diagnostic testsCancer195031323515405679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ToyokawaTKuboNTamuraTThe pretreatment controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients with resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a retrospective studyBMC Cancer201616172227599460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LePHLinWRKuoCJClinical characteristics of cytomegalovirus colitis: a 15-year experience from a tertiary reference centerTher Clin Risk Manag2017131585159329290686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuchesneJCTatumDJonesGMulti-institutional analysis of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with severe hemorrhage: a new mortality predictor valueJ Trauma Acute Care Surg201783588889328837540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) ProgramSEER*Stat database: incidence–SEER 18 Regs research data+Hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana cases, Nov 2016 Sub (1973–2014)–linked to county attributes–Total U.S., 1969–2015 counties. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2017 based on the November 2016 submission Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.govAccessed February 28, 2018
   Google Scholar
• D’AngioGJEvansABreslowNThe treatment of Wilms’ tumor: results of the Second National Wilms’ tumor StudyCancer1981479230223116164480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’AngioGJBreslowNBeckwithJBTreatment of Wilms’ tumor. Results of the third National Wilms’ tumor StudyCancer19896423493602544249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenDMBreslowNEBeckwithJBComparison between single-dose and divided-dose administration of dactinomycin and doxorubicin for patients with Wilms’ tumor: a report from the National Wilms’ tumor Study GroupJ Clin Oncol19981612372459440748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenDMBreslowNEBeckwithJBTreatment with nephrectomy only for small, stage I/favorable histology Wilms’ tumor: a report from the National Wilms’ tumor Study GroupJ Clin Oncol200119173719372411533093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XuYFYiYQiuSJPEBP1 downregulation is associated to poor prognosis in HCC related to hepatitis B infectionJ Hepatol2011535872879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangJXSongWChenZHPrognostic and predictive value of a microRNA signature in stage II colon cancer: a microRNA expression analysisLancet Oncol201314131295130624239208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BreimanLFriedmanJHOlshenRAStoneCJClassification and Regression TreesNew YorkChapman & Hall/CRC1984
   Google Scholar
• CiampiAThiffaultJNakacheJPAsselainBStratification by stepwise regression, correspondence analysis and recursive partition: a comparison of three methods of analysis for survival data with covariatesComput Stat Data Anal198643185204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SegalMRRegression trees for censored dataBiometrics19884413537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaXZengHZhangJChenLJiaHNew practical methods to obtain crucial data in performing diagnostic meta-analysis of the published literatureJ Evid Based Med2018111566329380525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PerkinsNJSchistermanEFThe inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curveAm J Epidemiol2006163767067516410346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetzgerMLDomeJSCurrent therapy for Wilms’ tumorOncologist2005101081582616314292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VujanićGMSandstedtBHarmsDSIOP Nephroblastoma Scientific CommitteeRevised International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) Working classification of renal tumors of childhoodMed Pediatr Oncol2002382798211813170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KalapurakalJADomeJSPerlmanEJManagement of Wilms’ tumour: current practice and future goalsLancet Oncol200451374614700607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute [homepage on the Internet]Surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) program2018 Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.govAccessed February 28, 2018
   Google Scholar
• BreslowNOlshanABeckwithJBGreenDMEpidemiology of Wilms tumorMed Pediatr Oncol19932131721817680412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MitryECiccolalloLColemanMPGattaGPritchard-JonesKEUROCARE Working GroupIncidence of and survival from Wilms’ tumour in adults in Europe: data from the EUROCARE studyEur J Cancer200642142363236816891111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TerenzianiMSpreaficoFColliniPAdult Wilms’ tumor: a monoinstitutional experience and a review of the literatureCancer2004101228929315241825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AliANDiazRShuHKPaulinoACEsiashviliNA surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) program comparison of adult and pediatric Wilms’ tumorCancer201211892541255121918969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar