A multicenter study of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic classification of breast lesions

References

• BrayFFerlayJSoerjomataramISiegelRLTorreLAJemalAGlobal Cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countriesCA Cancer J Clin201868639442430207593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LakhaniSREllisIOSchnittSJTanPHvan de VijverMJWHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast (IARC WHO Classification of Tumours)LyonIARC Press2012
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer SocietyBreast Cancer - Facts & Figures 2017–2018 Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2017-2018.pdfAccessed January 23, 2019
   Google Scholar
• SiegelRLMillerKDJemalACancer statistics, 2018CA Cancer J Clin201868173029313949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NjorSNyströmLMossSEuroscreen Working GroupBreast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studiesJ Med Screen201219Suppl 1_334122972809
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KorhonenKEWeinsteinSPMcDonaldESConantEFStrategies to increase cancer detection: review of true-positive and false-negative results at digital breast Tomosynthesis screeningRadiographics20163671954196527715711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShahTAGurayaSSBreast cancer screening programs: review of merits, demerits, and recent recommendations practiced across the worldJ Microsc Ultrastruct201752596930023238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FioricaJVBreast cancer screening, mammography, and other modalitiesClin Obstet Gynecol201659468870927741212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CovingtonMFPizzitolaVJLoransRThe future of contrast-enhanced mammographyAJR Am J Roentgenol2018210229230029064748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhaoYXLiuSHuYBGeYYLvDMDiagnostic and prognostic values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer: a retrospective studyOnco Targets Ther2017101123112928260926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BotticelliAMazzottiEDi StefanoDPositive impact of elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: an institutional experienceJ Ultrasound201518432132726550070
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RajaramNMariapunSErikssonMDifferences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysisBreast Cancer Res Treat2017161235336227864652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhuchiNSuzukiASobueTJ-START investigator groupsSensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan strategic anti-cancer randomized trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trialLancet20163871001634134826547101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RazaSGoldkampALChikarmaneSABirdwellRLUS of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical managementRadiographics20103051199121320833845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YJLiGWenLYangX-LinZhangHeterogeneity of angioarchitecture and their hemodynamic changes in benign and malignant breast tumorsZhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi20093112427 Chinese19538864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WanCDuJFangHLiFWangLEvaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysisEur J Radiol2012814e444e45021612882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuoJChenJDChenQPredictive model for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: is it feasible in malignant risk assessment of breast imaging reporting and data system 4 lesions?World J Radiol20168660060927358688
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CaplanLDelay in breast cancer: implications for stage at diagnosis and survivalFront Public Health2014228725121080
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LiuHJiangYXLiuJBZhuQLSunQEvaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: initial observationsBreast200817553253918534851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiXLiYZhuYFuLLiuPAssociation between enhancement patterns and parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microvessel distribution in breast cancerOncol Lett20181545643564929556301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XiaoXOuBYangHWuHLuoBBreast contrast-enhanced ultrasound: is a scoring system feasible? A preliminary study in ChinaPLoS One201498e10551725133534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuQWangXYZhuSYKangLKXiaoYJZhengHYMeta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesionsActa Radiol2015561253324436445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiQHuMChenZMeta-analysis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesionsUltrasound Med Biol201844591992929530434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangYRenHMeta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancerJ Cancer Res Ther201713586286829237918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenWZhengRBaadePDCancer statistics in China, 2015CA Cancer J Clin201666211513226808342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DenholmRDe StavolaBHipwellJHPre-natal exposures and breast tissue composition: findings from a British pre-birth cohort of young women and a systematic reviewBreast Cancer Res201618110227729066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KimSJParkYMJungSJSonographic appearances of juvenile fibroadenoma of the breastJ Ultrasound Med201433111879188425336474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangJBreast Ultrasound DiagnosisBeijingPeople’s Medical Publishing House2012
   Google Scholar
• Gathirua-MwangiWGZollingerTWMurageMJPradhanKRChampionVLAdult BMI change and risk of breast cancer: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010Breast Cancer201522664865626350490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhnJSchatzkinALaceyJVAdiposity, adult weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer riskArch Intern Med2007167192091210217954804
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaiHWChenDRWuYCComparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with sonography in the prediction of breast cancer tumor size: a concordance analysis with histo-pathologically determined tumor sizeAnn Surg Oncol201522123816382325707494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoubranHAKotbRRStakiwJEmaraMEBurnoufTRegulation of tumor growth and metastasis: the role of tumor microenvironmentCancer Growth Metastasis2014791824926201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WanCFDuJFangHLiFHZhuJSLiuQEnhancement patterns and parameters of breast cancers at contrast-enhanced us: correlation with prognostic factorsRadiology2012262245045922282183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangJXCaiLSChenLDaiJLSongGHCEUS helps to rerate small breast tumors of BI-RADS category 3 and category 4BioMed Res Int20142014418
   Google Scholar
• GolbabapourSPangWWGeorgeJPasupatiTAbdul-RahmanPSHashimOHChemically induced breast tumors in rats are detectable in early stages by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging but not by changes in the acute-phase reactants in serumInt J Mol Sci20111221030104021541040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El SheikhHAlmetaherHAAbdallaHSShareefMMIntraductal breast masses: sonographic and mammographic predictors of malignancyThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine201546412711278
   Google Scholar
• ChenYLGaoYChangCWangFZengWChenJJUltrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findingsCancer Imaging20181811129622044
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TelegrafoMRellaLStabile IanoraAAAngelelliGMoschettaMSupine breast us: how to correlate breast lesions from prone MRIBr J Radiol20168910592015049726689093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJMYangLLaroiaAFrankenEAFajardoLLMissed and/or misinterpreted lesions in breast ultrasound: reasons and solutionsCan Assoc Radiol J2011621414920947291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar