57
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Risk Stratification Of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Interim PET/CT By Combining Deauville Scores And International Prognostic Index

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 9449-9457 | Published online: 06 Nov 2019

References

  • Mamot C, Klingbiel D, Hitz F, et al. Final results of a prospective evaluation of the predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(23):2523–2529. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.984626150440
  • Adams HJ, Kwee TC. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;106:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.07.00327637352
  • Jiang M, Chen P, Ruan X, et al. Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT and BCL2 for predicting the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. Nucl Med Commun. 2018;39(2):147–153. doi:10.1097/MNM.000000000000078429189488
  • Yuan L, Kreissl MC, Su L, et al. Prognostic analysis of interim 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(2):478–488. doi:10.1007/s00259-018-4198-630382301
  • Oñate-Ocaña LF, Cortés V, Castillo-Llanos R, et al. Metabolic tumor volume changes assessed by interval 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for the prediction of complete response and survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(2):1411–1418. doi:10.3892/ol.2018.881730008818
  • Burggraaff CN, de Jong A, Hoekstra OS, et al. Predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(1):65–79. doi:10.1007/s00259-018-4103-330141066
  • Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-scan in lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(8):1257–1260. doi:10.1080/1042819090304004819544140
  • Kim J, Song YS, Lee JS, Lee WW, Kim SE. Risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with interim PET-CT based on different cutoff Deauville scores. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59(2):340–347. doi:10.1080/10428194.2017.133987728629257
  • Safar V, Dupuis J, Itti E, et al. Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(2):184–190. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.264822162590
  • Yang DH, Ahn JS, Byun BH, et al. Interim PET/CT-based prognostic model for the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the post-rituximab era. Ann Hematol. 2013;92(4):471–479. doi:10.1007/s00277-012-1640-x23238895
  • Yang DH, Min JJ, Song HC, et al. Prognostic significance of interim (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT after three or four cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(9):1312–1318. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.02721334197
  • Pregno P, Chiappella A, Bello M, et al. Interim 18-FDG-PET/CT failed to predict the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated at the diagnosis with rituximab-CHOP. Blood. 2012;119(9):2066–2073. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-06-35994322234681
  • Chow A, Phillips M, Siew T, et al. Prognostic nomogram for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma incorporating the International Prognostic Index with interim-positron emission tomography findings. Intern Med J. 2013;43(8):932–939. doi:10.1111/imj.1219423692386
  • Nols N, Mounier N, Bouazza S, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of metabolic response at interim positron emission tomography scan combined with International Prognostic Index is highly predictive of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55(4):773–780. doi:10.3109/10428194.2013.83184823927393
  • Zelenetz AD, Gordon LI, Wierda WG, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma version 1.2016. J National Compr Cancer Network. 2016;14(2):196–231. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0023
  • Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–3068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.880025113753
  • Barrington SF, Qian W, Somer EJ, et al. Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(10):1824–1833. doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1490-520505930
  • Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the imaging subcommittee of international harmonization project in lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):571–578. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.230517242397
  • Jiang M, Chen P, Ruan X, et al. Interim 18F‑FDG PET/CT improves the prognostic value of S-IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(6):6715–6723. doi:10.3892/ol.2017.709329344120
  • Itti E, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and DeltaSUVmax. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(9):1312–1320. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2435-623649463
  • Zhang Y, Fan Y, Ying Z, et al. Can the SUVmax-liver-based interpretation improve prognostic accuracy of interim and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma? Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59(3):660–669. doi:10.1080/10428194.2017.135717128771052
  • Carr R, Fanti S, Paez D, et al. Prospective international cohort study demonstrates inability of interim PET to predict treatment failure in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(12):1936–1944. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.14532625429159