Lymph-Vascular Space Invasion in Patients with Stages IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy

References

• Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):864–865. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91351-A1532291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q, et al. Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech. 2015;25(12):990–998. doi:10.1089/lap.2015.0390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(4):513–522. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.01426843445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah CA, Beck T, Liao JB, et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e82. doi:10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8229027400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Cai J, Dong W, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a single-institute experience with 404 patients. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(2):199–204. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shazly SAM, Murad MH, Dowdy SC, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(2):457–471. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.00926056752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Chu HJ, Shang CL, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(7):1264–1273. doi:10.1097/IGC.000000000000074927643649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–1904. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa180639530380365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1905–1914. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa180492330379613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallotta V, Conte C, Federico A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: a case matched control. Study Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(6):754–759. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.09229422253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado G, Vizza E, Legge F, et al. Comparison of different surgical approaches for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients: a multi-institution study and a review of the Literature.Int. J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(5):1020–1028. doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam J-H, Park J-Y, Kim D-Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):903–911. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr36021841155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-Y, Kim D-Y, Kim J-H, et al. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(6):1201–1209. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318256ccc522617585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diver E, Hinchcliff E, Gockley A, et al. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer is associated with reduced morbidity and similar survival outcomes compared with laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(3):402–406. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.00528011096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW, Lee SH. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(6):994–1002. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.01727546015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu TWY, Ming X, Yan HZ, Li ZY. Adverse effect of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy depends on tumor size in patients with cervical cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:8249–8255. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S21692931571982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SI, Lee M, Lee S, et al. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: a matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155(1):75–82. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.01931383569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusimano MC, Baxter NN, Gien LT, et al. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):619.e1-619. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odetto D, Puga MC, Saadi J, Noll F, Perrotta M. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(5):863–868. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-00032331155517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks M, van der Velden J, de Kroon CD, et al. Surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a multi-institution experience in 2124 cases in the Netherlands over a 30-year period. Medicine. 2018;28(4):757.
   Google Scholar
• Boyraz G, Basaran D, Salman MC, et al. Clinical and pathological characteristics related to parametrial involvement in clinical early-stage cervical cancer. Ginekologia Polska. 2016;87(6):417–421. doi:10.5603/GP.2016.001827418217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedone Anchora L, Turco LC, Bizzarri N, et al. How to select early-stage cervical cancer patients still suitable for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a propensity-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1947–1955. doi:10.1245/s10434-019-08162-531898100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Qiu S, Ding Y, et al. Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer in Jilin, China: a retrospective study. Medicine. 2019;98(40):e17301. doi:10.1097/MD.000000000001730131577720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skręt-Magierło J, Soja PJ, Skręt A, et al. Perineural space invasion in cervical cancer (FIGO IB1-IIB) accompanied by high-risk factors for recurrence. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10(4):957–961. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.13812625579536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo K, Shimada M, Saito T, et al. Risk stratification models for para-aortic lymph node metastasis and recurrence in stage IB–IIB cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018;29(1):e11. doi:10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e1129185269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulseren V, Kocaer M, Gungorduk O, et al. Preoperative predictors of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(6):1231–1234. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_467_1731898653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagotti A, Anchora LP, Conte C, et al. Beyond sentinel node algorithm. Toward a more tailored surgery for cervical cancer patients. Cancer Med. 2016;5(8):1725–1730. doi:10.1002/cam4.72227230108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz J, Köster S, Spacek Z, et al. The influence of pneumoperitoneum used in laparoscopic surgery on an intraabdominal tumor growth. Cancer. 1999;86(5):770–774. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<770::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-310463974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo L, et al. Effects of a simulated CO2 pneumoperitoneum environment on the proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis of cervical cancer cells in vitro. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2497–2503. doi:10.12659/MSM.89117925436974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong T-W, Chang S-J, Piao X, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(1):77–86. doi:10.1111/jog.1284026554751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, Kim HS, Lee KB, et al. Does the use of a uterine manipulator with an intrauterine balloon in total laparoscopic hysterectomy facilitate tumor cell spillage into the peritoneal cavity in patients with endometrial cancer? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(5):1145–1149. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01165.x18217979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizova A, Clarke BA, Bernardini MQ, et al. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(1):115–126. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31820273dc21164295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakowski JA, Tran TAN, Ahmad S, et al. Does a uterine manipulator affect cervical cancer pathology or identification of lymphovascular space involvement? Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(1):98–101. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.09422800652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casarin J, Buda A, Bogani G, et al. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159(1):164–170. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.50832665147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapdor R, Hertel H, Hillemanns P, et al. Peritoneal contamination with ICG-stained cervical secretion as surrogate for potential cervical cancer tumor cell dissemination: a proof-of-principle study for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019;98(11):1398‐1403. doi:10.1111/aogs.13681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anchora LP, Bizzarri N, Kucukmetin A, et al. Investigating the possible impact of peritoneal tumor exposure amongst women with early stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive approach. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;S0748–S7983(20):30829.
   Google Scholar
• Kanao H, Matsuo K, Aoki Y, et al. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(3):e71. doi:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e7130887768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmig R, Ind T. Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018;29(4):e75. doi:10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e7529770634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar