Diagnostic and Predictive Values of Strain Ratios in the Regions of Interests in Reference Tissue for Breast Tumor

References

• Zou HS, Xue Y, Ou Y, et al. Factors affecting the quality of breast quasistatic ultrasound elastograms. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(7):1701–1712. doi:10.1002/jum.1451829288591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachs A, Hartmann S, Stubert J, et al. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(2):131–136. doi:10.1055/s-0032-131316823108926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr RG. Sonographic breast elastography: a primer. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(5):773–783. doi:10.7863/jum.2012.31.5.77322535725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh J, Kim EK, Kim MJ, et al. Role of elastography for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions according to risk factors. Acta Radiol. 2019;60(3):278–285. doi:10.1177/028418511878090129890844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Zhou C, Zhan W, et al. Elastography ultrasound for breast lesions: fat-to-lesion strain ratio vs gland-to-lesion strain ratio. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(12):3171–3177. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3366-825182624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology. 1997;202(1):79–86. doi:10.1148/radiology.202.1.89881958988195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee C, Lombardo P, Schneider M, et al. Comparison of the fat-to-lesion strain ratio and the gland-to-lesion strain ratio with controlled precompression in characterizing indeterminate and suspicious breast lesions on ultrasound imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(12):3257–3266. doi:10.1002/jum.1503731140631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr RG, De Silvestri A, Scotti V, et al. Diagnostic performance and accuracy of the 3 interpreting methods of breast strain elastography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(6):1397–1404. doi:10.1002/jum.1484930411806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon JH, Koh SH, Park SY, et al. Comparison of the SR max, SR ave, and color map of strain-elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions. Acta Radiol. 2019;60(1):28–34. doi:10.1177/028418511877351029726693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho N, Moon W, Kim H, et al. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(1):1–7. doi:10.7863/jum.2010.29.1.120040770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadigh G, Carlos R, Neal CH, et al. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(3):923–931. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2020-x22418703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao QL, Ruan LT, Zhang H, et al. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(11):3245–3249. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.00422749109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(10):1227–1233. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.00420650662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerli H, Yilmaz T, Kaskati T, et al. Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations of solid breast lesions by sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(2):179–186. doi:10.7863/jum.2011.30.2.17921266555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al. Semi-quantitating stiffness of breast solid lesions in ultrasonic elastography. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(11):1347–1353. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.00318995186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick E. The breast ultrasound lexicon: breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Semin Roentgenol. 2011;46(4):245–251. doi:10.1053/j.ro.2011.04.00122035666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound and color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(6):553–559. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(90)90020-d2238263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341–350. doi:10.1148/radiol.239104167616484352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou JQ, Zhan WW, Dong YJ, et al. Stiffness of the surrounding tissue of breast lesions evaluated by ultrasound elastography. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1659–1667. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3152-724706104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue Y, Zou HS, Ou Y, et al. Strain histograms used for differential diagnosis of breast masses according to hardness percentage. Medicine(Baltimore). 2019;98(15):e15125. doi:10.1097/MD.000000000001512530985674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. C. W. Elston & I. O. Ellis. Histopathology 1991; 19; 403–410. Histopathology. 2002;41(3A):151–153. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.14691.x12405945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schnitt SJ. Will molecular classification replace traditional breast pathology? Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18(3Suppl):162s–166s. doi:10.1177/106689691037077120484283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbeck N, Gnant M. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389(10074):1134–1150. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-827865536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong LCH, Moey THL, Tan PH, et al. Comparative study of pattern-based versus size ratio ultrasound strain elastographic techniques on breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(7):1779–1790. doi:10.1002/jum.1486730484886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13(2):111–134. doi:10.1177/0161734691013002011858217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung NY, Park CS, Kim SH, et al. Sonoelastographic strain ratio: how does the position of reference fat influence it? Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34(6):440–447. doi:10.1007/s11604-016-0543-527059216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno E, Tohno E, Morishima I, et al. A preliminary prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of assist strain ratio versus manual strain ratio. J Med Ultrason. 2005;42(4):521–531. doi:10.1007/s10396-015-0633-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havre RF, Waage JR, Gilja OH, et al. Real-time elastography: strain ratio measurements are influenced by the position of the reference area. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33(6):550–568. doi:10.1055/s-0031-127324722833202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, et al. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(5):558–563. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.00620171905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Kim SH, Kang BJ, et al. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses. Acad Radiol. 2011;18(1):74–80. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.01421115376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR. 1998;170(1):109–114. doi:10.2214/ajr.170.1.94236109423610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaichman J, Marcus JC, Alsaadi T, et al. Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(3):W402–W408. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.737422915433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, et al. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(5):487–495. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.02223619292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology. 2012;263(3):673–677. doi:10.1148/radiol.1211131722523322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed AE, Kutasovic JR, Lakhani SR, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology,biomarkers and ’omics. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):12. doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0519-x25849106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph R, Richard G. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(1):129–134. doi:10.7863/ultra.33.1.12924371107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganau S, Andreu FJ, Escribano F, et al. Shear-wave elastography and immunohistochemical profiles in invasive breast cancer: evaluation of maximum and mean elasticity values. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(4):617–622. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.02025619502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Y, Song Y, Li SX, et al. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of breast cancer prognosis: a sonographic elastography study. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:9272–9279. doi:10.12659/MSM.91880631802780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(3):147–155. doi:10.1097/RLI.000000000000000624169069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamming’s F, Latorre-Ossa H, Le Frere-belda MA, et al. Shear wave elastography of tumour growth in a human breast cancer model with pathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2079–2086. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2828-823553589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Xue X, Hu C, et al. Comparison of clinicopathological features and prognosis in triple-negative and non-triple negative breast cancer. J Cancer. 2016;7(2):167–173. doi:10.7150/jca.1094426819640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzoic Dominkovic M, Ivanac G, Kelava T, et al. Elastographic features of triple negative breast cancers. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(4):1090–1097. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3925-726231093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko ES, Lee BH, Kim HA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between imaging and pathological findings. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(5):1111–1117. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1656-319898850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaki K, Ishida T, Miyashita M, et al. Correlation between mammographic findings and corresponding histopathology: potential predictors for biological characteristics of breast diseases. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(12):2179–2185. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02088.x21895869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durhan G, Öztekin P, Ünverdi H, et al. Do histopathological features and microcalcification affect the elasticity of breast cancer? J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(6):1101–1108. doi:10.7863/ultra.16.0606428240797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng XY, Huang YN, Liu YB, et al. Shear-wave elastography of the breast: added value of a quality map in diagnosis and prediction of the biological characteristics of breast cancer. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(2):172–180. doi:10.3348/kjr.2019.045331997592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH, et al. Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(9):2450–2458. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2866-223673574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar