72
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for the Estimation of Response to Platinum-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

, , &
Pages 1279-1289 | Published online: 11 Feb 2021

References

  • Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, et al. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169–182. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X30638582
  • Liu Y, Wu L, Tong R, et al. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cervical cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:65. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.0006530774597
  • Lapresa M, Parma G, Portuesi R, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer: an update. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(10):1171–1181. doi:10.1586/14737140.2015.107977726402247
  • Li R, Lu S-T, Si J-G, et al. Prognostic value of responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for patients with stage IB(2)/IIA(2) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(3):524–529. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.00623146686
  • Gadducci A, Cosio S. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: review of the literature and perspectives of clinical research. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(9):4819–4828. doi:10.21873/anticanres.1448532878770
  • Moore DH. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003;4(6):859–867. doi:10.1517/14656566.4.6.85912783583
  • Huang Y, Liu L, Cai J, et al. The efficacy and response predictors of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:10469–10477. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S27025833122946
  • Nishino M. Tumor response assessment for precision cancer therapy: response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and beyond. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38(38):1019–1029. doi:10.1200/EDBK_20144130231378
  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.02619097774
  • Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–1931. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu20724898551
  • Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, et al. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8(1):53. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-5319036144
  • Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565–574. doi:10.1177/0272989X0629536117099194
  • Benson R, Pathy S, Kumar L, et al. Locally advanced cervical cancer – neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation and targeted therapy as maintenance: a Phase II study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(6):1359–1364. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_39_1831898673
  • Ye Q, Yuan H-X, Chen H-L. Responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery predicts favorable prognosis for cervical cancer patients: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139(11):1887–1898. doi:10.1007/s00432-013-1509-y24022086
  • Fuso L, Mazzola S, Marocco F, et al. Pretreatment serum hemoglobin level as a predictive factor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cervical carcinoma: a preliminary report. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(Suppl 3):S187–91. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.07916185756
  • Gadducci A, Cosio S, Zola P, et al. Pretreatment platelet and hemoglobin levels are neither predictive nor prognostic variables for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective Italian study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(8):1399–1404. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f1574e21051984
  • Park J-S, Jeon EK, Chun SH, et al. ERCC1 (excision repair cross-complementation group 1) expression as a predictor for response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO stage 2B uterine cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120(2):275–279. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.10.03421093896
  • Shariat SF, Capitanio U, Jeldres C, et al. Can nomograms be superior to other prediction tools? BJU Int. 2009;103(4):492–5; discussion 495–7. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08073.x
  • Kumar R, Geuna E, Michalarea V, et al. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and its utilisation for the management of cancer patients in early clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(7):1157–1165. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.6725719834
  • Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Future Oncol. 2010;6(1):149–163. doi:10.2217/fon.09.13620021215
  • Bui JD, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunosurveillance, immunoediting and inflammation: independent or interdependent processes? Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19(2):203–208. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2007.02.00117292599
  • Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–867. doi:10.1038/nature0132212490959
  • Kusumanto YH, Dam WA, Hospers GAP, et al. Platelets and granulocytes, in particular the neutrophils, form important compartments for circulating vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis. 2003;6(4):283–287. doi:10.1023/B:AGEN.0000029415.62384.ba15166496
  • Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, et al. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(7):1073–1081. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp12719468060
  • Lin EY, Li J-F, Gnatovskiy L, et al. Macrophages regulate the angiogenic switch in a mouse model of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(23):11238–11246. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-127817114237
  • Lee Y, Kim SH, Han J-Y, et al. Early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reduction as a surrogate marker of prognosis in never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138(12):2009–2016. doi:10.1007/s00432-012-1281-422772951
  • Egan K, Crowley D, Smyth P, et al. Platelet adhesion and degranulation induce pro-survival and pro-angiogenic signalling in ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26125. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.002612522022533
  • Liu F, Zhou S, Tan L, et al. A retrospective cohort study on pretreated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and prognosis of small cell lung cancer: evidence of effect modification by chemotherapy regimen. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:10341–10352. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S26386333116889
  • Lee SM, Russell A, Hellawell G. Predictive value of pretreatment inflammation-based prognostic scores (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio) for invasive bladder carcinoma. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(11):749–755. doi:10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.74926568792
  • Yoneoka G, Bozhilov K, Wong LL. Prognostic ability of inflammation-based markers in radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res. 2020;6:6. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2020.57
  • Bowen RC, Little NAB, Harmer JR, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicator in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32171–32189. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1629128418870
  • Yang C, Wen H-B, Zhao Y-H, et al. Systemic inflammatory indicators as prognosticators in glioblastoma patients: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:580101. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.58010133117267
  • Zhu Y, Zhou S, Liu Y, et al. Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers in ovarian Cancer: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):443. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4318-529669528
  • Ethier J-L, Desautels D, Templeton A, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):2. doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0794-128057046