A Comparative Analysis of Robotic Single-Site Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery as Therapeutic Options for Stage IB1 Cervical Squamous Carcinoma

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.2149230207593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltari M, Corrado G, Patrizi L, Vizza E. Comment: survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robot- ic-assisted or laparoendoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016;25:244–245. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.00527566029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchana T, Sirisabya N, Lertkhachonsuk R, et al. Long term complications after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(4):451–456.19374292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A, Malzoni C. Total laparoendoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1316–1323. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0342-719224286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoendoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS. 2008;12(3):227–237.18765043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309(7):689–698. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.18623423414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, Al-Khaduri M, Kew F, Lopes AD. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD006655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JH, Howard FM. Abdominal wall nerve injury during laparoendoscopic gynecologic surgery: incidence, risk factors, and treatment utcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):448–453. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.00922560041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateo S, Nozza A, Del Pezzo C, Mereu L. Robotic single-site pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(3):631. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.02724999106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin VC, Tsai YC, Chung SD, et al. A comparative study of multiport versus laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy for benign adrenal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1135–1139. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2012-722083326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaphas A, Hagen ME, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary re- view. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(1):1–11. doi:10.1002/rcs.144522711444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY, Nam JH. Laparotomy conversion rate of laparoendoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in a consecutive series without case selection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):3030–3035. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3707-524748163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, et al. Ro-Bot-assisted versus total laparoendoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:334–339. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.34221236473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Jiang H, Nie J, et al. Concurrent learning curves of 3-Dimensional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer using 2-Dimensional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy as a benchmark: a single surgeon’s experience. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:5903–5919. doi:10.12659/MSM.91495231392971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong IG, Khandwala YS, Kim JH, et al. Association of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with perioperative outcomes and health care costs, 2003 to 2015. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1561–1568. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.1458629067427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargiulo AR. Computer-assisted reproductive surgery: why it matters to reproductive endocrinology and infertility subspecialists. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):911–921. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.02825274484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg D, Vidovszky TJ, Lau J, Guiroy B, Rivas H. Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3182–3186. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2874-y23443484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2759–2764. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-2922-923468046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendag F, Akdemir A, Oztekin MK. Robotic single-incision transumbilical total hysterectomy using a single-site robotic platform: initial report and technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:147–151. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.00423900041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, et al. The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1686–1692. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0830-720035346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar PF, Knight J, Rao S, Weinberg L. Da Vinci single-site platform: anthropometrical, docking and suturing consideration for hysterectomy in the cadaver model. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8:191–195. doi:10.1002/rcs.44822374880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Choi CH, Choi JK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:1466–1473. doi:10.1097/IGC.000000000000023225207462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:589–594. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.01518722971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar