The Impact of Different Simulation Modalities on Target Volume Delineation in Breast-Conserving Radiotherapy

References

• SungH, FerlayJ, SiegelRL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.2166033538338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenW, ZhengR, BaadePD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi:10.3322/caac.2133826808342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarbyS, McGaleP, CorreaC, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1707–1716. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-222019144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BartelinkH, MaingonP, PoortmansP, et al. Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):47–56. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71156-825500422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkeM, CollinsR, DarbyS, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–2106. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-716360786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandisDM, LuoW, SongJ, et al. Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(5):1299–1308. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.02617275202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersenRP, TruongPT, KaderHA, et al. Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(1):41–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.07017707265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KirbyAM, YarnoldJR, EvansPM, et al. Tumor bed delineation for partial breast and breast boost radiotherapy planned in the prone position: what does MRI add to X-ray CT localization of titanium clips placed in the excision cavity wall?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(4):1276–1282. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.02819464816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HurkmansC, AdmiraalM, van der SangenM, DijkmansI. Significance of breast boost volume changes during radiotherapy in relation to current clinical interobserver variations. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90(1):60–65. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.00118207594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van MourikAM, ElkhuizenPH, MinkemaD, DuppenJC, van Vliet-vroegindeweijC. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2010;94(3):286–291. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.00920199818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhippEC, HalliwellM. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in the postoperative breast: the clinical target volume-tumor and its relationship to the chest wall. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(1):49–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.02118440725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClauserP, MannR, AthanasiouA, et al. A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(5):1909–1918. doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5121-429168005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van HeijstTC, den HartoghMD, LagendijkJJ, van den BongardHJ, van AsselenB. MR-guided breast radiotherapy: feasibility and magnetic-field impact on skin dose. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(17):5917–5930. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/591723920343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetcalfeP, LineyGP, HollowayL, et al. The potential for an enhanced role for MRI in radiation-therapy treatment planning. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013;12(5):429–446. doi:10.7785/tcrt.2012.50034223617289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-HammadiN, CaparrottiP, DivakarS, et al. MRI reduces variation of contouring for boost clinical target volume in breast cancer patients without surgical clips in the tumour bed. Radiol Oncol. 2017;51(2):160–168. doi:10.1515/raon-2017-001428740451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangW, CurreyA, ChenX, et al. A comparison of lumpectomy cavity delineations between use of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography acquired with patient in prone position for radiation therapy planning of breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94(4):832–840. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.01426972656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JolicoeurM, RacineML, TropI, et al. Localization of the surgical bed using supine magnetic resonance and computed tomography scan fusion for planification of breast interstitial brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100(3):480–484. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.02421924509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiezenM, KouwenhovenE, ScholtenAN, et al. MRI- versus CT-based volume delineation of lumpectomy cavity in supine position in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(4):1332–1340. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.00821708426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MastM, CoerkampE, HeijenbrokM, et al. Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value?Radiol Oncol. 2014;9:65. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-9-65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-BastawissiAY, WhiteE, MandelsonMT, TaplinS. Variation in mammographic breast density by race. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11(4):257–263. doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00225-811306344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del CarmenMG, HalpernEF, KopansDB, et al. Mammographic breast density and race. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(4):1147–1150. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.061917377060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaulsonES, EricksonB, SchultzC, AllenLX. Comprehensive MRI simulation methodology using a dedicated MRI scanner in radiation oncology for external beam radiation treatment planning. Med Phys. 2015;42(1):28–39. doi:10.1118/1.489609625563245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmittMC, BirdwellRL, GoffinetDR. Breast electron boost planning: comparison of CT and US. 10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap34203. Radiology. 2001;219(1):203–206. doi:10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap3420311274557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KouwenhovenE, GiezenM, StruikmansH. Measuring the similarity of target volume delineations independent of the number of observers. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(9):2863–2873. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/01819384002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThebergeV, WhelanT, ShaitelmanSF, ViciniFA. Altered fractionation: rationale and justification for whole and partial breast hypofractionated radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011;21(1):55–65. doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2010.08.00721134655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorraoG, RojasDP, CiardoD, et al. Intra- and inter-observer variability in breast tumour bed contouring and the controversial role of surgical clips. Med Oncol. 2019;36(6):51. doi:10.1007/s12032-019-1273-131037520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HepelJT, EvansSB, HiattJR, et al. Planning the breast boost: comparison of three techniques and evolution of tumor bed during treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(2):458–463. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.05119084347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PogsonEM, DelaneyGP, AhernV, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for breast target volume delineation in prone and supine positions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(4):905–912. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.00227788960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacobsonG, ZambaG, BettsV, MuruganandhamM, Buechler-PriceJ. Image-based treatment planning of the post-lumpectomy breast utilizing CT and 3TMRI. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:246265. doi:10.4061/2011/24626522295215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar