Tumor-to-Gland Volume Ratio versus Tumor-to-Breast Ratio as Measured on CBBCT: Possible Predictors of Breast-Conserving Surgery

References

• van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, et al. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158–1170. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30067-527344114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–1232. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa02098912393819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 Phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):412–419. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70042-622373563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann-Johnsen OJ, Kåresen R, Schlichting E, et al. Survival is better after breast conserving therapy than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer: a registry-based follow-up Study of Norwegian Women Primary Operated Between 1998 and 2008. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3836–3845. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4441-325743325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese Anti-Cancer Association CoBCS. Guidelines and standards for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer by the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (2019 Edition). Chin Oncol. 2019;29(08):609–680.
   Google Scholar
• Wienbeck S, Lotz J, Fischer U. Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe. Clin Imaging. 2017;42:50–59. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.11.01127875762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Vedantham S, Karellas A, et al. Library based x-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT. Med Phys. 2016;43(8):4529. doi:10.1118/1.495512127487870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rößler AC, Kalender W, Kolditz D, et al. Performance of photon-counting breast computed tomography, digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis in evaluating breast specimens. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(2):184–190. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.01727888024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al. Breast cancer-major changes in the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(4):290–303. doi:10.3322/caac.2139328294295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.2149230207593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CL, Liao MN, Chen SC, et al. Body image and its predictors in breast cancer patients receiving surgery. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35(5):E10–16. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182336f8b22067694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe KA, Semple J, Quan ML, et al. Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):233–241. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1828-721674270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn LB, Cooper BA, Neuhaus J, et al. Identification of distinct depressive symptom trajectories in women following surgery for breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2011;30(6):683–692. doi:10.1037/a002436621728421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg SM, Dominici LS, Gelber S, et al. Association of breast cancer surgery with quality of life and psychosocial well-being in young breast cancer survivors. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(11):1035–1042. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.332532936216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilewskie M, Olcese C, Eaton A, et al. Perioperative breast MRI is not associated with lower locoregional recurrence rates in DCIS patients treated with or without radiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(5):1552–1560. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3424-524385207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen KE, Conant EF, Cohen EA, et al. Breast cancer conspicuity on simultaneously acquired digital mammographic images versus digital breast tomosynthesis images. Radiology. 2019;292(1):69–76. doi:10.1148/radiol.201918202731084481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell A, Conover DL, Zhang Y, et al. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):496–509. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.101720651210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienbeck S, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, et al. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(9):3731–3741. doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5376-429594402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell AM, Kawakyu-O’Connor D. Dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography and diagnostic mammography: comparison of radiation dose, patient comfort, and qualitative review of imaging findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:7. doi:10.4103/2156-7514.9327422439131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu M, Cheng X, Cheng X, et al. Areas of breast tissue covered in cone beam breast CT imaging. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(3):913–916. doi:10.3892/etm.2017.409228450919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S, et al. Newer technologies in breast cancer imaging: dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018;39(1):106–113. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2017.09.00129317032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzi A, Schiaffino S, Della Pepa G, et al. MRI-derived tumour-to-breast volume is associated with the extent of breast surgery. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(2).
   Google Scholar
• Yue M, Y Z, Liu A, et al. The accuracy of tumor size evaluation on invasive breast cancer based on cone beam breast CT. Chin J Radiol. 2019;(04):286–291.
   Google Scholar
• Chagpar AB, Butler M, Killelea BK, et al. Does three-dimensional intraoperative specimen imaging reduce the need for re-excision in breast cancer patients? A prospective cohort study. Am J Surg. 2015;210(5):886–890. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.01826255230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Ma Y, et al. Cone-beam breast CT features associated with HER2/neu overexpression in patients with primary breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(5):2731–2739. doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06587-w31900700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk M, Vos EL, Koning AHJ, et al. TUmor-volume to breast-volume RAtio for improving COSmetic results in breast cancer patients (TURACOS); a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):336. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3280-y28514945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faermann R, Sperber F, Schneebaum S, et al. Tumor-to-breast volume ratio as measured on MRI: a possible predictor of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16(2):101–105.24645229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos EL, Koning AH, Obdeijn IM, et al. Preoperative prediction of cosmetic results in breast conserving surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(2):178–184. doi:10.1002/jso.2378225332158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukancsik D, Kelemen P, Újhelyi M, et al. Objective decision making between conventional and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: an aesthetic and functional prospective cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(2):303–310. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.01028069398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1194–1220.31161190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar