Simple Hysterectomy for Patients with Stage IA2 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

References

• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.33538338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small W Jr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, et al. Cervical cancer: a global health crisis. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2404–2412. doi:10.1002/cncr.3066728464289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet (London, England). 2019;393(10167):169–182. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, et al. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Oncol Lett. 2020;20(3):2058–2074. doi:10.3892/ol.2020.1175432782524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Pareja R, Rendón GJ, Millan C, Frumovitz M, Schmeler KM. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):254–259. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.00424041877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schover LR, et al. Quality of life and sexual functioning in cervical cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7428–7436. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.00.399616234510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander-Sefre F, Chee N, Spencer C, Menon U, Shepherd JH. Surgical morbidity associated with radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(3):450–454. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.00716343604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Liang C, Lu A, et al. Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004–2016. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):294–302. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.02932507516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang JH, Kim BW, Jeong H, Kim H. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: a nationwide study from the National Health Insurance. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(1):117–122. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.68632354468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel HHB, Kruitwagen R, Nijman HW, et al. Short-term surgical complications after radical hysterectomy-a nationwide cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):925–932. doi:10.1111/aogs.1381231955408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori E, Fallo L, La Face B, Bianchi UA, Pecorelli S. Extended radical hysterectomy in early-stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix: tailoring the radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995;5(2):143–147. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05020143.x11578469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashima K, Yahata T, Fujita K, Tanaka K. Analysis of the complications after radical hysterectomy for stage IB, IIA and IIB uterine cervical cancer patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(3):555–559. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01174.x20598037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likic IS, Kadija S, Ladjevic NG, et al. Analysis of urologic complications after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):644.e641–643. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegeman M, Louwen M, van der Velden J, et al. The incidence of parametrial tumor involvement in select patients with early cervix cancer is too low to justify parametrectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(2):475–480. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.01617292460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vranes B, Milenkovic S, Radojevic M, Soldatovic I, Kesic V. Risk of parametrial spread in small Stage I cervical carcinoma: pathology review of 223 cases with a tumor diameter of 20 mm or less. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(2):416–421. doi:10.1097/IGC.000000000000060426745697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiamset I, Hanprasertpong J. Risk factors for parametrial involvement in early-stage cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Oncol Res Treatment. 2016;39(7–8):432–438. doi:10.1159/000447335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaia I, Musella A, Bellati F, et al. Simple extrafascial trachelectomy and pelvic bilateral lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(1):78–81. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.00422487540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju SK, Papadopoulos AJ, Montalto SA, et al. Fertility-sparing surgery for early cervical cancer-approach to less radical surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(2):311–317. doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182370f5122237381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen JMV, Covens A. Simple hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: caution, but don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater! Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(6):1129–1131. doi:10.1097/AOG.000000000000358931764720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.24141714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bean S, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: cervical cancer, Version 1.2020. J Natal Comp Cancer Net. 2020;18(6):660–666. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2020.0027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Logue T, Kaplan SJ, et al. Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;224:348–358.e5.33306971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kalbani M, McVeigh G, Nagar H, McCluggage WG. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(2):291–295.22080884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard-Fortier G, Reade CJ, Covens A. Non-radical surgery for small early-stage cervical cancer. Is it time? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):624–627. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.03724480237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sia TY, Chen L, Melamed A, et al. Trends in use and effect on survival of simple hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(6):1132–1143. doi:10.1097/AOG.000000000000352331764721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marana HR, de Andrade JM, Matthes AC, Spina LA, Carrara HH, Bighetti S. Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. Analysis of prognostic factors. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2001;22(1):64–66.11321499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zhang WN, Zhang SM, Gao Y, Zhang TH, Zhang P. Class I hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer. Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech. 2018;13(4):494–500. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2018.7683230524620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HO, Qualls CR, Romero AA, et al. Is there a difference in survival for IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85(2):229–241.11972381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liontos M, Kyriazoglou A, Dimitriadis I, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A. Systemic therapy in cervical cancer: 30 years in review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;137:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.02.00931014518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–1904. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa180639530380365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1905–1914. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa180492330379613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, et al. Survival after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(7):1019–1027. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.169432525511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AJB, Jones TN, Miao D, Fader AN. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):544–555.e547. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.02333359291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atasii T, Aksu MF, Cetinkaya MB. Prognostic factors that affect survival after the treatment of early stage cervical carcinoma. Int Surg. 2000;85(2):147–151.11071333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter GG, Ansink AC, Heintz AP, Delemarre J, Aartsen EJ, Hart AA. Low stage invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix stage I-IIA morphological prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1988;14(2):187–192.3360161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghardt E, Baltzer J, Tulusan AH, Haas J. Results of surgical treatment of 1028 cervical cancers studied with volumetry. Cancer. 1992;70(3):648–655. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19920801)70:3<648::AID-CNCR2820700318>3.0.CO;2-R1623479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante M. Radical versus simple hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection with low-risk early stage cervical cancer (SHAPE). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01658930. Accessed March 10, 2021.
   Google Scholar