Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis

References

• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi:10.3322/caac.2155130620402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt DE, Beeler WH, de Moraes FY, et al. An integrated multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases: an International Spine Oncology Consortium report. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):e720–30. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30612-529208438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):643–648. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66954-116112300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson KÅ, Bauer HCF. Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(2):196–202. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0870-615744540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein JA, Zaveri G, Wai E, Vidmar M, Kreder H, Chow E. A population-based study of surgery for spinal metastases. Survival rates and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(7):1045–1050. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.85B7.1420114516044
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian NF, Wu YS, Zhang XL, Xu HZ, Chi YL, Mao FM. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar the current evidence. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:174l–1749. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2747-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miscusi M, Polli FM, Forcato S, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(5):518–525. doi:10.3171/2014.10.SPINE13120125723122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang T, Dong J, Zhou X, McGuire RA, Li X. Comparison of mini-open anterior corpectomy and posterior total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(4):271–279. doi:10.3171/2012.7.SPINE11108622881038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Kwan MK, Algenstaedt P, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis: a prospective propensity score-matched study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(10):789–797. doi:10.1097/BRS.000000000000189327584676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikata T, Isogai N, Shiono Y, et al. A retrospective cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive versus open surgical techniques in the treatment of spinal metastases. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(8):E1082–7. doi:10.1097/BSD.000000000000046027841799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang TJ, Hsu RWW, Li YY, Cheng CC. Minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in treating thoracic spine metastasis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(16):1860–1863. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000225995.56028.4616845365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Malhotra R, Maharajan K, et al. Metastatic spine tumor surgery a comparative study of minimally invasive approach using percutaneous pedicle screws fixation versus open approach. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E1015–21. doi:10.1097/BSD.000000000000040027352374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau D, Chou D. Posterior thoracic corpectomy with cage reconstruction for metastatic spinal tumors: comparing the mini-open approach to the open approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(2):217–227. doi:10.3171/2014.12.SPINE1454325932599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique and complications. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;20(3):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Harel R, Doron O, Knoller N. Minimally invasive spine metastatic tumor resection and stabilization: new technology yield improved outcome. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015. doi:10.1155/2015/948373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zairi F, Arikat A, Allaoui M, Marinho P, Assaker R. Minimally invasive decompression and stabilization for the management of thoracolumbar spine metastasis: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(1):19–23. doi:10.3171/2012.4.SPINE11110822607222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzokou A, Weil AG, Shedid D. Minimally invasive removal of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors using a nonexpandable tubular retractor: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(6):708–715. doi:10.3171/2013.9.SPINE12106124138063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch H, Boco T, Lobel J. Minimally invasive transpedicular vertebrectomy for metastatic disease to the thoracic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(2):101–105. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31805fea0118391713
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwab JH, Gasbarrini A, Cappuccio M, et al. Minimally invasive posterior stabilization improved ambulation and pain scores in patients with plasmacytomas and/or metastases of the spine. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:1–5. doi:10.1155/2011/239230
   Google Scholar
• Kato S, Hozumi T, Takaki Y, Yamakawa K, Goto T, Kondo T. Optimal schedule of preoperative embolization for spinal metastasis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22):1964–1969. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a4657623917645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong CG, Cho JH, Suh DC, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Lee CS. Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional? World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):45. doi:10.1186/s12957-017-1118-328193282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu N, Benson KRK, Kumar KA, et al. Local control and toxicity outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases of gastrointestinal origin. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(1):87–94. doi:10.3171/2020.1.SPINE191260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva PS, Pereira P, Monteiro P, Silva PA, Vaz R. Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(2):E7. doi:10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura H, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T, Matsuda S. Effects of lumbar stiffness after lumbar fusion surgery on activities of daily living. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(8):719–727. doi:10.1097/BRS.000000000000130026630422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yuan L, Zeng Y, Liu Y, Chen Z, Li W. Evaluation of lumbar stiffness after long-level fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis via a Chinese version of the lumbar stiffness disability index. Spine J. 2021:S1529-9430(21)00781-6. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(5):503–507. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657dc318317193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2253–2257. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d8e17873819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar