Microbubble-mediated ultrasound therapy: a review of its potential in cancer treatment

References

• Love RR Leventhal H Easterling DV Nerenz DR Side effects and emotional distress during cancer chemotherapy Cancer 1989 63 3 604 612 2912536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsueza J-J Charniotb J-C Vignatb N Artigoub J-Y Cardiac side-effects of cancer chemotherapy Int J Cardiol 2010 144 1 3 15 20399520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro C Recht A Side effects of adjuvant treatment of breast cancer N Engl J Med 2001 344 26 1997 2008 11430330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura DK Dix MM Cravatt BF Activity-based protein profiling for biochemical pathway discovery in cancer Nat Rev Cancer 2010 10 9 630 638 20703252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J Hong K Kirpotin D Anti-HER2 immunoliposomes: enhanced efficacy attributable to targeted delivery Clin Cancer Res 2002 8 1172 1181 11948130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottesman MM Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance Annu Rev Med 2002 53 615 627 11818492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabizon AA Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: metamorphosis of an old drug into a new form of chemotherapy Cancer Invest 2001 19 4 424 436 11405181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele E Spinelli GP Miele E Tomao F Tomao S Albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel (Abraxane ABI-007) in the treatment of breast cancer Int J Nanomedicine 2009 4 99 105 19516888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barenholz Y Doxil® – the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned J Control Release 2012 160 2 117 134 22484195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowens J Creaven P Greco W Initial clinical (Phase I) trial of TLC D-99 (doxorubicin encapsulated in liposomes) Cancer Res 1993 53 2796 2802 8504422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabizon A Catane R Uziely B Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes Cancer Res 1994 154 987 992 8313389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singal PK Iliskovic N Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy N Engl J Med 1998 339 13 900 905 9744975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson RD Mushlin PS Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity: analysis of prevailing hypotheses FASEB J 1990 4 13 3076 3086 2210154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minotti G Menna P Salvatorelli E Cairo G Gianni L Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity Pharmacol Rev 2004 56 185 229 15169927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrois GJ Allen TM Multiple injections of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: pharmacokinetics and therapeutic activity J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003 306 3 1058 1067 12808004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabizon A Shmeeda H Barenholz Y Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies Clin Pharmacokinet 2003 42 5 419 436 12739982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong I Huang X Bettegowda C A bacterial protein enhances the release and efficacy of liposomal cancer drugs Science 2006 314 5803 1308 1311 17124324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietze LF Neumann M Möllers T Proton-mediated liberation of aldophosphamide from a nontoxic prodrug: a strategy for tumor-selective activation of cytocidal drugs Cancer Res 1989 49 4179 4184 2743306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JM Wilson WR Exploiting tumor hypoxia in cancer treatment Nat Rev Cancer 2004 4 437 447 15170446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breistøl K Hendriks HR Berger DP Langdon SP Fiebig HH Fodstad O The antitumour activity of the prodrug N-L-leucyldoxorubicin and its parent compound doxorubicin in human tumour xenografts Eur J Cancer 1998 34 10 1602 1606 9893636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopin A Ebner S Attali B Shabat D Enzymatic Activation of second-generation dendritic prodrugs: conjugation of self-immolative dendrimers with PEG via click chemistry Bioconjug Chem 2006 17 1432 1440 17105221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamis M Lode HN Shabat D Bioactivation of self-immolative dendritic prodrugs by catalytic antibody 38C2 J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 1726 1731 14871103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooseboom M Commandeur JN Vermeulen NP Enzyme-catalyzed activation of anticancer prodrugs Pharmacol Rev 2004 56 1 53 102 15001663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TM Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy Nat Rev Cancer 2002 2 750 763 12360278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmali PP Kotamraju VR Kastantin M Targeting of albumin-embedded paclitaxel nanoparticles to tumors Nanomedicine 2009 5 1 73 82 18829396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy EA Majeti BK Barnes LA Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery to tumor vasculature suppresses metastasis Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008 105 27 9343 9348 18607000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo SK Labhasetwar V Nanotech approaches to drug delivery and imaging Drug Discov Today 2003 8 24 1112 1120 14678737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghimi SM Hunter AC Murray JC Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice Pharmacol Rev 2001 53 2 283 318 11356986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen T Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy Nat Rev Cancer 2002 2 750 763 12360278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich AS Biophysical aspects of using liposomes as delivery vehicles Biosci Rep 2002 22 2 129 150 12428898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolonin M Pasqualini R Arap W Molecular addresses in blood vessels as targets for therapy Curr Opin Chem Biol 2001 5 3 308 313 11479123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood JD Bednarski M Frausto R Tumor regression by targeted gene delivery to the neovasculature Science 2002 296 5577 2404 2407 12089446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer AJ Grosu AL Carlsen J [18F]galacto-RGD positron emission tomography for imaging of alphavbeta3 expression on the neovasculature in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Clin Cancer Res 2007 13 22 6610 6616 18006761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su ZF Liu G Gupta S Zhu Z Rusckowski M Hnatowich DJ In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a Technetium-99m-labeled cyclic RGD peptide as a specific marker of alpha(V)beta(3) integrin for tumor imaging Bioconjug Chem 2002 13 3 561 570 12009947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaupel P Kallinowski F Okunieff P Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review Cancer Res 1989 49 6449 6465 2684393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fradet Y Islam N Boucher L Parent-Vaugeois C Tardif M Polymorphic expression of a human superficial bladder tumor antigen defined by mouse monoclonal antibodies Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987 84 7227 7231 3313389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanelli CI DeMarta S Hennige CW Kadri MM Beamforming for therapy with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using quantitative schlieren Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium October 31–November 3, 1993 Baltimore, MD 1993 1233 1238
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen S Benchimol M Simberg D Schutt C Steiner J Esener S A novel nested liposome drug delivery vehicle capable of ultrasound triggered release of its payload J Control Release 2011 155 3 358 366 21745505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindley J Gedroyc WM Regan L MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results Am J Roentgenol 2004 183 6 1713 1719 15547216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JE Ter Haar GR Cranston D High intensity focused ultrasound: surgery of the future? Br J Radiol 2003 76 909 590 599 14500272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromi S Frenkel V Luk A Pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound and low temperature-sensitive liposomes for enhanced targeted drug delivery and antitumor effect Clin Cancer Res 2007 13 2722 2727 17473205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart M Curiel L Gelet A Lyonnet D Chapelon J-Y Rouvière O Influence of perfusion on high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate ablation: a first-pass MRI study Magn Reson Med 2007 58 1 119 127 17659632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu LX Zhu L Holmes KR Thermo regulation in the canine prostate during transurethral microwave hyperthermia, Part I: Temperature response Int J Hyperthermia 1998 14 1 29 37 9483444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikfarjam M Muralidharan V Christophi C Mechanisms of focal heat destruction of liver tumors J Surg Res 2005 127 2 208 223 16083756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussios CC Farny CH Ter Haar G Roy RA Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) Int J Hyperthermia 2007 23 2 105 120 17578336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhlova VA Bailey MR Reed JA Cunitz BW Kaczkowski PJ Crum LA Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom J Acoust Soc Am 2006 119 1834 1848 16583923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana K Feril LB Ikeda-Dantsuji Y Sonodynamic therapy Ultrasonics 2008 48 4 253 259 18433819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal I Sostaric JZ Riesz P Sonodynamic therapy “a review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound.” Ultrason Sonochem 2004 11 6 349 363 15302020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stride E Saffari N Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2003 217 429 447 14702981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong N Bouakaz A Frinking P Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles Echocardiography 2002 19 3 229 240 12022933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bibra H Voigt JU Froman M Bone D Wranne B Juhlin- Dannfeldt A Interaction of microbubbles with ultrasound Echocardiography 1999 16 7 Pt 2 733 741 11175216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutt EG Pelura TJ Hopkins RM Osmotically stabilized microbubble ultrasound contrast agents Acad Radiol 1996 3 Suppl 2 S188 S190 8796558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutt E Klein D Mattrey R Riess J Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2003 42 3218 3235 12876730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara K Pollard R Borden M Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007 9 415 447 17651012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borden MA Pu G Runner GJ Longo ML Surface phase behavior and microstructure of lipid/PEG-emulsifier monolayer-coated microbubbles Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004 35 3 209 223 15261034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH Costello MJ Duncan PB Needham D Mechanical properties and microstructure of polycrystalline phospholipid monolayer shells: novel solid microparticles Langmuir 2003 19 20 8455 8466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchimol MJ Hsu MJ Schutt CE Hall DJ Mattreyc RF Esener SC Phospholipid/carbocyanine dye-shelled microbubbles as ultrasound-modulated fluorescent contrast agents Soft Matter Epub January 4, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch SH Wan M Dayton PA Ferrara KW Optical observation of lipid-and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents Appl Phys Lett 2004 84 4 631 633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin CT Lancée C Borsboom J Brandaris 128: a digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames Rev Sci Instrum 2003 74 12 5026 5034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomas JE Dayton P May D Ferrara K Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents J Biomed Opt 2001 6 2 141 150 11375723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema M van Wamel A Folkert J de Jong N High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles Med Phys 2005 32 3707 3711 16475770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbin V Cojoc D Ferrari E Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging Appl Phys Lett 2007 90 114103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayton PA Allen JS Ferrara KW The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents J Acoust Soc Am 2002 112 5 2183 2192 12430830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouakaz A Versluis M de Jong N High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction Ultrasound Med Biol 2005 31 3 391 399 15749563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayton PA Chomas JE Lum AFH Optical and acoustical dynamics of microbubble contrast agents inside neutrophils Biophys J 2001 80 1547 1556 11222315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomas JE Dayton P May D Ferrara K Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents J Biomed Opt 2001 6 2 141 150 11375723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum LA Surface oscillations and jet development in pulsating bubbles J Phys (Paris) 1979 40 11 285 288
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara K Pollard R Borden M Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007 9 415 447 17651012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J Lewis TN Prausnitz MR Non-invasive assessment and control of ultrasound-mediated membrane permeabilization Pharm Res 1998 15 6 918 924 9647359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis J Manasseh R Liovic P Cavitation microstreaming and stress fields created by microbubbles Ultrasonics 2010 50 2 273 279 19896683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama T Tomita Y Cavitation bubble behavior and bubble-shock wave interaction near a gelatin surface as a study of in vivo bubble dynamics Appl Phys B 2000 70 139 149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MW Miller DL Brayman AA A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective Ultrasound Med Biol 1996 22 9 1131 1154 9123638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward M Wu J Chiu J-F Experimental study of the effects of optison® concentration on sonoporation in vitro Ultrasound Med Biol 2000 26 7 1169 1175 11053752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward M Wu J Chiu JF Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents J Acoust Soc Am 1999 105 5 2951 2957 10335644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karshafian R Samac S Banerjee M Bevan P Burns P Ultrasound-induced uptake of different size markers in mammalian cells Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium September 18–21, 2005 13 16
   Google Scholar
• Ross JP Cai X Chiu JF Yang J Wu J Optical and atomic force microscopic studies on sonoporation J Acoust Soc Am 2002 111 3 1161 1164 11931292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ Luo YK Lu CT Phospholipids-based microbubbles sonoporation pore size and reseal of cell membrane cultured in vitro J Drug Target 2008 16 1 18 25 18172816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao S Thrall BD Miller DL Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro Ultrasound Med Biol 1997 23 6 953 959 9300999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch S Pohl P Cobet U Rainov NG Ultrasound enhancement of liposome-mediated cell transfection is caused by cavitation effects Ultrasound Med Biol 2000 26 5 897 903 10942837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarnitsyn V Rostad CA Prausnitz MR Modeling transmembrane transport through cell membrane wounds created by acoustic cavitation Biophys J 2008 95 9 4124 4138 18676653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li ZG Luo KQ Ohl CD Zhang JB Liu AQ A single-cell membrane dynamic from poration to restoration by bubble-induced jetting flow Proceedings for the 15th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences 2011 94 96
   Google Scholar
• Okada K Kudo N Niwa K Yamamoto K A basic study on sonoporation with microbubbles exposed to pulsed ultrasound J Med Ultrasonics 2005 32 3 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skyba DM Price RJ Linka AZ Skalak TC Kaul S Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue Circulation 1998 98 4 290 293 9711932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I De Geest BG Vandenbroucke RE Ultrasound-responsive polymer-coated microbubbles that bind and protect DNA Langmuir 2006 22 17 7273 7278 16893226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felgner PL Gadek TR Holm M Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987 84 7413 7417 2823261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepko CL Roberts BE Mulligan RC Constructions and applications of a highly transmissible murine retrovirus shuttle vector Cell 1984 37 1053 1062 6331674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soughayer JS Krasieva T Jacobson SC Ramsey JM Tromberg BJ Allbritton NL Characterization of cellular optoporation with distance Anal Chem 2000 72 1342 1347 10740880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver JC Chizmadzhev YA Theory of electroporation: a review Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1996 4 135 160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hapala I Breaking the barrier: methods for reversible permeabilization of cellular membranes Crit Rev Biotechnol 1997 17 2 105 122 9192473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov AL Microbubble contrast agents targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound assisted drug-delivery applications Invest Radiol 2006 41 3 354 362 16481920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger E McCreery T Sweitzer R Caldwell V Wu Y Acoustically active lipospheres containing paclitaxel: a new therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent Invest Radiol 1998 33 12 886 892 9851823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y Miyoshi H Nakamura M Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery J Control Release 2006 114 89 99 16824637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirolomoom A Dayton PA Lum AF Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle J Control Release 2007 118 275 284 17300849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SL Liposomes in ultrasonic drug and gene delivery Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008 60 1167 1176 18479776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R Takizawa T Negishi Y Utoguchi N Maruyama K Effective gene delivery with novel liposomal bubbles and ultrasonic destruction technology Int J Pharm 2008 354 49 55 18082343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R Takizawa T Negishi Y Tumor specific ultrasound enhanced gene transfer in vivo with novel liposomal bubbles J Control Release 2008 125 137 144 18035442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrenn S Dicker S Small E Mleczko M Controlling cavitation for controlled release Proceedings for the Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2009 IEEE International September 20–23, 2009 104 107 Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Huang SL MacDonald RC Acoustically active liposomes for drug encapsulation and ultrasound-triggered release Biochim Biophys Acta 2004 1665 134 141 15471579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg BB Liu JB Forsberg F Ultrasound contrast agents: a review Ultrasound Med Biol 1994 20 2 319 333 8085289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove D Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview Eur J Radiol 2006 60 3 324 330 16938418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz G Ultrasonic imaging of molecular targets Basic Res Cardiol 2008 103 2 174 181 18324373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanna V Pintus G Bandiera P Development of polymeric microbubbles targeted to prostate-specific membrane antigen as prototype of novel ultrasound contrast agents Mol Pharm 2011 8 3 748 757 21545176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin F Dhanaliwala A Patil A Hossack J Real-time targeted molecular imaging using singular value spectra properties to isolate the adherent microbubble signal Phys Med Biol 2012 57 16 5275 5293 22853933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couture O Dransart E Dehay S Tumor delivery of ultrasound contrast agents using Shiga toxin B subunit Mol Imaging 2011 10 2 135 143 21439258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CR Hu X Zhang H Ultrasound molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis with an integrin targeted microbubble contrast agent Invest Radiol 2011 46 4 215 224 21343825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann BA Lindner JR Molecular imaging with targeted contrast ultrasound Curr Opin Biotechnol 2007 18 1 11 16 17241779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu RX Huang J Xu JS Fabrication of indocyanine green encapsulated biodegradable microbubbles for structural and functional imaging of cancer J Biomed Opt 2009 14 3 034020 19566313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg RD Yankaskas BC Abraham LA Performance benchmarks for screening mammography Radiology 2006 241 1 55 66 16990671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veen RL Amelink A Menke-Pluymers M van der Pol C Sterenborg HJ Optical biopsy of breast tissue using differential path-length spectroscopy Phys Med Biol 2005 50 11 2573 2581 15901955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaupel P Schlenger K Knoop C Hockel M Oxygenation of human tumors: evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancers by computerized O2 tension measurements Cancer Res 1991 51 12 3316 3322 2040005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen HL Haustermans KM Balm AJ Begg AC Hypoxia in head and neck cancer: how much, how important? Head Neck 2005 27 7 622 638 15952198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromberg BJ Shah N Lanning R Noninvasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy Neoplasia 2000 2 1 26 40 10933066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intes X Djeziri S Ichalalene Z Time-domain optical mammography SoftScan: initial results Acad Radiol 2005 12 10 1355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutt CE Benchimol MJ Hsu MJ Esener SC Ultrasound-modulated fluorescent contrast agent for optical imaging through turbid media Proc SPIE 2011 8165 81650B1 81650B7 Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.894056
   Google Scholar
• Yuan B Ultrasound-modulated fluorescence based on a fluorophore-quencher-labeled microbubble system J Biomed Opt 2009 14 2 240 243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan B Sensitivity of fluorophore-quencher labeled microbubbles to externally applied static pressure Med Phys 2009 36 8 3455 3469 19746779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen S Zahavy E Wrasdilo W Berns M Chan M Esener S A novel Doxorubicin prodrug with controllable photolysis activation for cancer chemotherapy Pharm Res 2010 27 9 1848 1860 20596761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchimol MJ Ibsen SD Simberg D Wu Z Mattrey RF Esener SC Quantified lysis of cell-like lipid membranes due to nanoparticle-facilitated cavitation J Acoust Soc Am 2011 130 2502
   Google Scholar
• Serpe L Foglietta F Canaparo R Nanosonotechnology: the next challenge in cancer sonodynamic therapy Nanotechnol Rev 2012 1 2 173 182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuziuti T Yasui K Sivakumar M Iida Y Miyoshi N Correlation between acoustic cavitation noise and yield enhancement of sonochemical reaction by particle addition J Phys Chem A 2005 109 21 4869 4872 16833832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmann JK Cheng Z Davis C Targeted microbubbles for imaging tumor angiogenesis: assessment of whole-body biodistribution with dynamic micro-PET in mice Radiology 2008 249 1 212 219 18695212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar