Control of mercury emissions: policies, technologies, and future trends

References

• United Nations Environmental Programme. The global atmospheric mercury assessment: sources, emissions, and transport. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Programme, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE), Chemicals Branch; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Technical background report for the global mercury assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, United Nations Environmental Programme; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis A, Maag J. Study on EU implementation of the Minamata convention on mercury. Bipro, Garrigues. June 30, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mishima A, Brown LR. Bitter Sea: The Human Cost of Minamata Disease. Tokyo, Japan: Kosei Publishing; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Jesty J. Making mercury visible: the Minamata documentaries of Tsuchimoto Noriaki. In: Zuber SL, Newman MC, editors. Mercury Pollution: A Transdisciplinary Treatment. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lessons from Minamata disease and mercury management in Japan. Ministry of the Environment, Japan; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Basel convention technical guidelines. United Nations Environmental Programme, Basel Convention; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Authenticated United States Government Information. Public law 110–414 – Oct 2008;154(110–477).
   Google Scholar
• Emmott N, Slayne M. Legislation and policy concerning mercury in the European Union. In: Pirrone N, Mahaffey KR, editors. Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2005:65–80.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 implementing directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for non-directional household lamps. Official Journal of the European Union. March 18, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler O. Waste electrical and electronic equipment. In: EU Regulatory Decision Making and the Role of the United States. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2013:93–141.
   Google Scholar
• Guide for negotiators of multilateral environmental agreements. United Nations Environmental Programme. 2007. Available from: http://www.unep.org/publications/contents/pub_details_search.asp?ID=3925. Accessed August 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environmental Programme. Study on mercury sources and emissions, and analysis of cost and effectiveness of control measures “UNEP Paragraph 29 study”. Geneva, Switzerland: UNEP, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE), Chemicals Branch; Nov 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, et al. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2010;10:5951–5964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason RP. Mercury emissions from natural processes and their importance in the global mercury cycle. In: Mason R, Pirrone N, editors. Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009:173–191.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environmental Programme. Global mercury assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases, and transport. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Programme, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE), Chemicals Branch; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney JS, Marley NA. In-depth review of atmospheric mercury: sources, transformations, and potential sinks. Energy Emission Control Technol. 2014;2:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Friedli HR, Radke LF, Lu JY, Banic CM, Leaitch WR, MacPherson JI. Mercury emissions from burning of biomass from temperate North American forests: laboratory and airborne measurements. Atmos Environ. 2003;37:253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinnirella S, Pirrone N. Spatial and temporal distributions of mercury emissions from forest fires in Mediterranean region and Russian federation. Atmos Environ. 2006;40:7346–7361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebinghaus R, Slemr F, Brenninkmeijer CAM, et al. Emissions of gaseous mercury from biomass burning in South America in 2005 observed during Caribic flights. Geophys Res Lett. 2007;34(8):1–5.doi:10.1029/2006GL028866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedinmyer C, Friedli H. Mercury emission estimates from fires: an initial inventory for the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:8092–8098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nriagu J, Becker C. Volcanic emissions of mercury to the atmosphere: global and regional inventories. Sci Total Environ. 2003;304:3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyle DM, Mather TA. The importance of volcanic emissions for the global atmospheric mercury cycle. Atmos Environ. 203;37:5115–5124.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara R, Mazzolai B, Lanzillotta E, Nucaro E, Pirrone N. Volcanoes as emission sources of atmospheric mercury in the Mediterranean basin. Sci Total Environ. 2000;259:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone N, Costa P, Pacyna JM, Ferrara R. Mercury emissions to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources in the Mediterranean region. Atmos Environ. 2001;35:2997–3006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason RP, Sheu GR. Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2002;16(4):40-1–40-14.doi:10.1029/2001GB001440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecock IM, Pirrone N, Trunfio GA, Sprovieri F. Integrated mercury cycling, transport, and air-water exchange (MECAWEx) model. J Geophys Res. 2006;(D20,27):1–13.doi:10.1029/2006JD007117.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Emissions. In: Pirrone N, Keating T, editors. Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollutants Part B: Mercury. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations; 2011:75–96. HTAP 2010 Assessment Report.
   Google Scholar
• Zagar D, Petkovsek G, Rajar R, et al. Modelling of mercury transport and transformations in the water compartment of the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Chem. 2007;107:64–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason RP, Choi AL, Fitzgerald WF, et al. Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environ Res. 2012;119:101–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, et al. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources. In: Pirrone N, Mason R, editors. Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009:3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Feng X. Mercury pollution in China – an overview. In: Pirrone N, Mahaffey KR, editors. Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2005:657–678.
   Google Scholar
• Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S. Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ. 2006;40:4048–4063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Streets D, Hao J, Wu Y, Li G. Mercury emissions from industrial sources in China. In: Mason R, Pirrone N, editors. Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009:67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Fu X, Feng X, Sommar J, Wang S. A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China. Sci Total Environ. 2012;421–422:73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu D, Zhang W, Chen L, et al. Mercury emissions from waste combustion in China from 2004 to 2010. Atmos Environ. 2012;62:359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Hu Y. Mercury in municipal solid waste in China and its control: a review. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:593–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm SM. Estimate of mercury emissions to the atmosphere from petroleum. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:4704–4710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee AB, Bhattacharya P, Sarkar A, Zevenhoven R. Mercury emissions from industrial sources in India and its effects in the environment. In: Mason R, Pirrone N, editors. Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009:81–112.
   Google Scholar
• EU legislation on export/storage/disposal of mercury. Brasilia: Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environmental; May 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Boone T, Ganeshan R. A primer on E-waste. In: Boone T, Jayaraman V, Ganeshan R, editors. Sustainable Supply Chains. Vol 174. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2012:107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Selin NE, Selin H. Global politics of mercury pollution: the need for multi-scale governance. RECIEL. 2006;15(3):258–269.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European parliament and of the council of July 4, 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union. 2012;55. doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.197.eng.
   Google Scholar
• European Environmental Bureau. Environmental NGOs response to stakeholder consultation on mercury-containing lamps – exemptions 7,8,9 (review of annex to the RoHS directive). September 4, 2012. Available from: http://rohs.exemptions.oeko.info/fileadmin/user_upload/RoHS_VI/General_contributions/20120904_EEEB_ZMWG_RoHS_Stakeholder_consultation_Ex_No_7_8_9.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaj P, Cofala J, Kuenen J, Wyrwa A, Zysk J. Modeling the impact of European renewable energy policies on emissions of mercury. In: Page B, Fleischer AG, Wohlgemuth V, editors. EnviroInfo 2013. Aachen, Germany: Shaker; 2013:503–513.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Locating and estimating air emissions from sources of mercury and mercury compounds. December 1997. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/le/mercury.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units and standards of performance for fossil-fuel-fired electric utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating units. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Implementation of the mercury-containing and rechargeable battery management act. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency; Nov 1997. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/recycling/battery.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert KF, Evers DC, Warner KA, King SL, Selin NE. Integrating mercury science and policy in the marine context: challenges and opportunities. Environ Res. 2012;119:132–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson JB. Hazardous waste: EPA needs to clarify the types of mercury waste that can be treated and disposed of using the debris regulations. GAO-6-99. 2005:1–58. Available from: http://www.gao.gov/assets/250/248832.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Addressing mercury releases. In: EPA’s roadmap for Mercury. Jul 2006:21–33. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/archive/roadmap/pdfs/I_HgReleases.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s roadmap for mercury. Jul 2006. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/archive/roadmap/pdfs/FINAL-Mercury-Roadmap-6-29.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA training module, introduction to universal waste. September 2005. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/inforesources/pubs/training/uwast05.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA training module, introduction to land disposal restrictions (40 CFR part 268). September 2005. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/inforesources/pubs/training/ldr05.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schierow LJ. The toxic substances control act (TSCA): a summary of the act and its major requirements. Congressional Research Service Report; April 1, 2013. Available from: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31905.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann M. Safe drinking water act (SDWA): a summary of the act and its major requirements. Congressional Research Service Report. February 5, 2014. Available from: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31243.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Porter BO. Division of pulmonary, allergy, and rheumatology products medical officer consultation. April 22, 2010. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/DentalProductsPanel/UCM236366.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Minister of Justice. Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. July 22, 2014. Available from: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Accessed August 19, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Minister of Justice. Chlor-Alkali Mercury Liquid Effluent Regulations. C.R.C., c. 811. July 22, 2014. Available from: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Accessed August 19, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Cheng H. Mercury risk from fluorescent lamps in China: current status and future perspective. Environ Internat. 2012;44:141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development, part 1: CCICED 2011 Annual General Meeting, Special Policy Study on Mercury Management in China. 2011:409–463. Available from: http://www.cciced.net/encciced/policyresearch/report/201205/P020120529368288424164.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal A. Moving towards mercury-free health care: substituting mercury-based medical devices in India. Toxics Link. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Creating networks and information for mercury policy in India and Europe. Toxics Link. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty LB, Qureshi A, Vadenbo C, Hellweg S. Anthropogenic mercury flows in India and impacts of emission controls. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:8105–8113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Lessons from Minamata disease and mercury management in Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Jan 2011. Available from: http://www.env.go.jp/en/focus/docs/files/20110101-39.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Waste management and public cleansing law. 2001. Available from: http://www.env.go.jp/en/laws/recycle/01.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Lessons from Minamata disease and mercury management in Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Sep 2013. Available from: http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/tmms/pr-m/mat01/en_full.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Jang E, Kim K-R, Kim K-H, Hur T. Material flow analysis and human risk assessment of mercury. In: Matsumoto M, Umeda Y, Masui K, Fukushige S, editors. Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2012:888–890.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Seo YC, Jurng JS, et al. Mercury emissions from selected stationary combustion sources in Korea. Sci Total Environ. 2004;325:155–161.doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min DK, Rhee SW. Management of municipal solid waste in Korea. In: Pariatamby A, Tanaka M, editors. Municipal Solid Waste Management in Asia and the Pacific Islands. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2014:173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee SW, Choi HH, Park HS. Performance evaluation of material separation from spent fluorescent lamps using the thermal end-cutting method. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage. 2013;15(4):503–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee SW, Choi HH, Park HS. Characteristics of mercury emission from linear type of spent fluorescent lamp. Waste Manage. 2014;34:1066–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society of Solid Waste Management Experts in Asia and Pacific Islands. Appropriate management of mercury waste. In: Proceedings of the 13th SWAPI meeting special symposium; Kyoto University; March 11, 2014; Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Hajeb P, Jinap S, Ismail A, Mahyudin NA. . Mercury pollution in Malaysia. In: Whitacre DM, editor. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2012;220:45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Vesilind PA, Warrell WA, Reinhark DR. Materials Separation. In: Solid Waste Engineering. Pacific Grove, CA: BooksCole; 2002:224–277.
   Google Scholar
• Jang M, Hong SM, Park JK. Characterization and recovery of mercury from spent fluorescent lamps. Waste Manage. 2005;25:5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura Kohsan Co, Ltd. Treatment of Mercury-containing Wastes at Itomuka plant of Nomurakohsan Co, Ltd. Tokyo, Japan. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Locating and estimating air emissions from sources of mercury and mercury compounds. 1997. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/le/mercury.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Iverfeldt A, Lindqvis O. Atmospheric oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone in the aqueous phase. Atmos Environ. 1986;20(8):1567–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munthe J. The aqueous oxidation of elemental mercury by ozone. Atmos Environ. Part a – General Topics. 1992;26(8):1461–1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton GA, Yang H, Brown RC, Laudal DL, Dunham GE, Erjavec J. Heterogenous oxidation of mercury in simulated post combustion conditions. Fuel. 2003;82(2):107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presto AA, Granite EJ, Karash A, Hargis RA, O’Dowd WJ, Pennline HW. A kinetic approach to the catalytic oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(5):1941–1945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H. . Photochemical redox reactions of mercury. In: Atwood DA, editor. Recent Developments in Mercury Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006;120:37–79.
   Google Scholar
• United states environmental Protection Agency. Mercury treatment technologies. 2007. Available form: http://www.cluin.org/contaminantfocus/default.focus/sec/Mercury/cat/Treatment_Technologies. Accessed August 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Treatment technologies for mercury in soil, waste and water. 2007. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/tio/download/remed/542r07003.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Musmarra D, Karatza D, Lancia A, Prisciandaro M, Celso GMD. Adsorption of mercury chloride onto activated carbon on a new pilot scale plant. Chem Eng Trans. 2013;32:574–552.doi:10.3303/CET1332092.
   Google Scholar
• Luo J, Hein AM, Hwang JY. Adsorption of vapor phase mercury on various carbons. J Minerals Mater Characterization Eng. 2004;3(1):13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chang TC, Yen JH; Univ of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan. On-site mercury-contaminated soils remediation by using thermal desorption technology. J Hazardous Mater. 2006;128(2–3):208–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busto Y, Cabrera X, Tack FMG, Verloo MG. Potential of thermal treatment for decontamination of mercury containing wastes from chlor-alkali industry. J Hazardous Mater. 2011;186:114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CJ, NcGugan PJ. Evaporation of mercury from domestic waste leachate. J Hazardous Mater. 1972;78(2):253–258.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Workshop on mercury in products, processes, waste and the environment: eliminating, reducing and managing risks from non-combustion sources. Treatment and Disposal Options, Proceedings and Summary Report; 2001. Available from: http://www.clu-in.org/download/contaminantfocus/mercury/workshop-on-mercury-in-products.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Method 1630. Aug 1998.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Commission Decision of 3 May 2000 replacing decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to article 1(a) of council directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of council directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann S. Technologies for the stabilization of elemental mercury and mercury-containing wastes. Global Res Safety. 2009:252. Available from: http://www.grs.de/sites/default/files/pdf/GRS%20- %20252_0.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Piao H, Bishop PL. Stabilization of mercury-containing wastes using sulfide. EnvironPollut. 2006;139:498–506.
   Google Scholar
• Randall PM, Chattopadhyay S. Bench-scale evaluation of chemically bonded phosphate ceramic technology to stabilize mercury waste mixtures. J Environ Eng. Mar 2010:265–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall P, Chattopadhyay S. Advances in encapsulation technologies for the management of mercury-contaminated hazardous wastes. J Hazardous Mater. 2004;B114:211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Treatment technologies for mercury in soil, waste, and water. Aug 2007. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/tio/download/remed/542r07003.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yang JX, Zhang MX, Li XL. Mercury pollution characteristics in the soil around landfill. In: Lin S, Huang X, editors. Advances in Computer Science, Environment, Ecoinformatics, and Education. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011;214:336–340.
   Google Scholar
• Dookhun V, Mahadeo K. Assessment of mercury pollution at mare Chicose landfill in Mauritius. In: Bhowon MG, Sabina JL, Wah HLK, Ramasami P, editors. Chemistry Education in the ICT Age. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009:427–435.
   Google Scholar
• BiPRO GmbH. Requirements for facilities and acceptance criteria for the disposal of metallic mercury. BiPRO GmbH Reports; April 16, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. Guidance document for the offshore industry on commission regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 on the banning of exports and safe storage of metallic mercury. Mar 2013.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Energy. Long-term management and storage of elemental mercury. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Global mercury observation system. 2014. Available from: http://www.gmos.eu/. Accessed October 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Apisitpuvakul W, Piumsomboon P, Watts DJ, Koetsinchai W. LCA of spent fluorescent lamps in Thailand at various rates of recycling. J Cleaner Product. 2008;16:1046–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. Society of environmental toxicology and chemistry. Life cycle management. 2009. Available form: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1208xPA-LifeCycleApproach-Howbusinessusesit.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Clercq JD. Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions by adsorption on a new ultra stable mesoporous adsorbent and on a commercial ion exchange resin. Internat J Industrial Chem. 2012;3(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hsi HC, Rood MJ, M.ASCE2, Massoud RA, Chen S, Chang R. Mercury adsorption properties of sulfur-impregnated adsorbents. J Environ Eng. Nov 2002:1080–1089. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:11(1080).
   Google Scholar
• Khaloo SS, Matin AH, Sharifi S, Fadaeinia M, Kazempour N, Mirzadeh S. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of mercury adsorption on almond shell. Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(8):1341–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar