Effect of Ruta graveolens Extract on the Major Virulence Factors in Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

References

• Oliveira D, Borges A, Simões M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and their molecular activity in infectious diseases. Toxins. 2018;10(6):252. doi:10.3390/toxins10060252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gendy MMAA, El-Bondkly AMA, Keera AA, Ali AM. Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in microbial community of cancer patients and evaluation of their resistant pattern. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018;43(1):83–92. doi:10.1007/s13369-017-2670-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algammal AM, Hetta HF, Elkelish A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): one health perspective approach to the bacterium epidemiology, virulence factors, antibiotic-resistance, and zoonotic impact. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:3255. doi:10.2147/IDR.S272733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosimi RA, Beik N, Kubiak DW, Johnson JA. Ceftaroline for severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(2):ofx084. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanamani A, Hariharan P, Paul- Satyaseela M. Staphylococcus aureus: overview of bacteriology, clinical diseases, epidemiology, antibiotic resistance and therapeutic approach. In: Enany S, Alexander L, editors. Frontiers in Staphylococcus Aureus. London: IntechOpen; 2017:3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gajdács M, Urbán E. Epidemiology and resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from vaginal samples: a 10-year retrospective study in Hungary. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panon Adriat. 2019;28(4):143–147. doi:10.15570/actaapa.2019.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatoon Z, McTiernan CD, Suuronen EJ, Mah TF, Alarcon EI. Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Heliyon. 2018;4(12):e01067. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idrees M, Sawant S, Karodia N, Rahman A. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: morphology, genetics, pathogenesis and treatment strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7602. doi:10.3390/ijerph18147602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti O, Marasca S, Candelora M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of chronic wound infections: alternative strategies for management. AIMS Microbiol. 2022;8(2):125–137. doi:10.3934/microbiol.2022011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourbakhsh F, Namvar AE. Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016;11:Doc07. doi:10.3205/dgkh000267
   Google Scholar
• Hu H, Ramezanpour M, Hayes AJ, et al. Sub-inhibitory clindamycin and azithromycin reduce S. aureus exoprotein induced toxicity, inflammation, barrier disruption and invasion. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1617. doi:10.3390/jcm8101617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):76. doi:10.1186/s13756-019-0533-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells CM, Beenken KE, Smeltzer MS, Courtney HS, Jennings JA, Haggard WO. Ciprofloxacin and rifampin dual antibiotic-loaded biopolymer chitosan sponge for bacterial inhibition. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl_1):433–444. doi:10.1093/milmed/usx150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochbaum AI, Kolodkin-Gal I, Foulston L, Kolter R, Aizenberg J, Losick R. Inhibitory effects of D-amino acids on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(20):5616–5622. doi:10.1128/JB.05534-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrino B, Schillaci D, Carnevale I, et al. Synthetic small molecules as anti-biofilm agents in the struggle against antibiotic resistance. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;161:154–178. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.10.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontecha-Umaña F, Ríos-Castillo AG, Ripolles-Avila C, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Antimicrobial activity and prevention of bacterial biofilm formation of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticle-containing polyester surfaces at various concentrations for use. Foods. 2020;9(4):442. doi:10.3390/foods9040442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazargani MM, Rohloff J. Antibiofilm activity of essential oils and plant extracts against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilms. Food Control. 2016;61:156–164. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro-Neto V, de Souza CD, Gonzaga LF, et al. Cuminaldehyde potentiates the antimicrobial actions of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232987. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft KM, Nguyen JM, Berg LJ, Townsend SD. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): antibiotic-resistance and the biofilm phenotype. Med Chem Comm. 2019;10(8):1231–1241. doi:10.1039/C9MD00044E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira JWA, Costa RA, da Cunha MT, Cavalcante TTA. Antibiofilm activity of natural substances derived from plants. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2017;11(26):1051–1060. doi:10.5897/AJMR2016.8180
   Google Scholar
• Parham S, Kharazi AZ, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, et al. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and antiviral properties of herbal materials. Antioxidants. 2020;9(12):1309. doi:10.3390/antiox9121309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushnie T, Cushnie B, Echeverría J, et al. Bioprospecting for antibacterial drugs: a multidisciplinary perspective on natural product source material, bioassay selection and avoidable pitfalls. Pharm Res. 2020;37(7):1–24. doi:10.1007/s11095-020-02849-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;40(2):175–179. doi:10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00122-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry A. The Antimicrobic Susceptibility Test: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 32nd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala T, Remes S, Haansuu P, et al. Antimicrobial activity of some coumarin containing herbal plants growing in Finland. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;73(1–2):299–305. doi:10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00279-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms D, Cizdziel P, Chomczynski P. TRIzol: a new reagent for optimal single-step isolation of RNA. Focus. 1993;15(4):532–535.
   Google Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Majmaie S, Nahar L, Rahman M, et al. Anti-MRSA constituents from Ruta chalepensis (Rutaceae) grown in Iraq, and in silico studies on two of most active compounds, chalepensin and 6-hydroxy-rutin 3’,7-dimethyl ether. Molecules. 2021;26(4):1114. doi:10.3390/molecules26041114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honarmand H, Saeidinia A. Study on antibacterial effect of Ruta graveolens extracts on pathogenic bacteria. Ann Biol Res. 2012;3:4542–4545.
   Google Scholar
• Naghibi Harat Z, Kamalinejad M, Sadeghi M, Sadeghipour E. A review on Ruta graveolens L. its usage in traditional medicine and modern research data. J Med Plants. 2009;8:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hajikhani B, Goudarzi M, Kakavandi S, et al. The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10(1):75. doi:10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JT, Huang IW, Chang SC, et al. Increasing resistance to fusidic acid among clinical isolates of MRSA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(2):616–618. doi:10.1093/jac/dkw430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi F. Characterization of resistance to aminoglycosides in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a tertiary care hospital in Tehran, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(1):e29237. doi:10.5812/jjm.29237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva V, Almeida L, Gaio V, et al. Biofilm formation of multidrug-resistant MRSA strains isolated from different types of human infections. Pathogens. 2021;10(8):970. doi:10.3390/pathogens10080970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem T, Schnall BS, Azrad M, Baum M, Rokney A, Peretz A. Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;133(2):922–929. doi:10.1111/jam.15612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascioferro S, Carbone D, Parrino B, et al. Therapeutic strategies to counteract antibiotic resistance in MRSA biofilm-associated infections. Chem Med Chem. 2021;16(1):65–80. doi:10.1002/cmdc.202000677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova A, Mikhova B, Najdenski H, Tsvetkova I, Kostova I. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of Ruta graveolens. Fitoterapia. 2005;76(3–4):344–347. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2005.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzoreky NS, Nakahara K. Antibacterial activity of extracts from some edible plants commonly consumed in Asia. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;80(3):223–230. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00169-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran N, Ozer B, Duran GG, Onlen Y, Demir C. Antibiotic resistance genes and susceptibility patterns in staphylococci. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(3):389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(6):2151–2156. doi:10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue M, Suzuki T, Fujita Y, et al. Synergistic effect of polyoxometalates in combination with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a high initial inoculum of 1 x 108 cfu/mL for in vivo test. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60(5):220–226. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2006.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar