References
- DannehlKExperimental study versus non-experimental study: the non-experimental (non-randomized) study as a methodological compromiseAbelUKochANonrandomized Comparative Clinical StudiesDüsseldorfSymposion19984152
- RosenbaumPRRubinDBThe central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika19837014155
- BrookhartMASchneeweissSRothmanKJGlynnRJAvornJStürmerTVariable selection for propensity score modelsAm J Epidemiol2006163121149115616624967
- RubinDBThomasNMatching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practiceBiometrics19965212492648934595
- StürmerTJoshiMGlynnRJAvornJRothmanKJSchneeweissSA review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methodsJ Clin Epidemiol200659543744716632131
- HahnJOn the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effectsEconometrica1998662315331
- BrysonADorsettRPurdonSThe Use of Propensity Score Matching in the Evaluation of Active Labour Market PoliciesLondonDepartment for Work and Pensions2002
- CattaneoMDEfficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorabilityJ Econom20101552138154
- FengPZhouXHZouQMFanMYLiXSGeneralized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatmentsStat Med201231768169721351291
- RubinDBEstimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scoresAnn Intern Med19971278 Pt 27577639382394
- AugurzkyBSchmidtCMThe propensity score: a means to an end2001 Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=270919Accessed April 5, 2016
- AustinPCGrootendorstPAndersonGMA comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo studyStat Med20072673475316708349
- D’AgostinoRBJrD’AgostinoRBSrEstimating treatment effects using observational dataJAMA2007297331431617227985
- FrölichMFinite-sample properties of propensity score matching and weighting estimatorsRev Econ Stat20048617790
- OttoMElrefaiMKrammerJWeissCKienlePHasenbergTSleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass lead to comparable changes in body composition after adjustment for initial body mass indexObes Surg201626347948526189734
- ChagnacAWeinsteinTHermanMHirshJGafterUOriYThe effects of weight loss on renal function in patients with severe obesityJ Am Soc Nephrol20031461480148612761248
- CottamDRSchaeferPAShaftanGWVelcuLAngusLDEffect of surgically-induced weight loss on leukocyte indicators of chronic inflammation in morbid obesityObes Surg200212333534212082883
- FolsomARQamhiehHTWingRRImpact of weight loss on plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), factor VII, and other hemostatic factors in moderately overweight adultsArterioscler Thromb19931321621698427853
- KyleUGGentonLPichardCLow phase angle determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis is associated with malnutrition and nutritional risk at hospital admissionClin Nutr201332229429922921419
- LaymanDKBoileauRAEricksonDJA reduced ratio of dietary carbohydrate to protein improves body composition and blood lipid profiles during weight loss in adult womenJ Nutr2003133241141712566476
- NormanKStobäusNPirlichMBosy-WestphalABioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis – clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parametersClin Nutr201231685486122698802
- PelleymounterMACullenMJBakerMBEffects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob miceScience199526952235405437624776
- PeterliRBorbélyYKernBEarly results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypassAnn Surg2013258569069523989054