Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin

References

• NawarENiskaRWXuJNational hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2005 emergency department summaryAdv Data2007386132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareAustralian Hospital Statistics 2011–12: Emergency Department CareHealth Services Series No. 45. Cat. no. HSE 126Canberra, AustraliaAIHW2012
   Google Scholar
• GoodacreSCrossEArnoldJThe health care burden of acute chest painHeart200591222923015657244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CullenLGreensladeJMerolliniKCost and outcomes of assessing patients with chest pain in an Australian emergency departmentMed J Aust2015202842743225929506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinstockMBWeingartSOrthFRisk for clinically relevant adverse cardiac events in patients with chest pain at hospital admissionJAMA Intern Med201517571207121225985100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FanaroffACRymerJAGoldsteinSADoes this patient with chest pain have acute coronary syndrome?: the rational clinical examination systematic reviewJAMA2015314181955196526547467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HessEPAgarwalDChandraSDiagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a meta-analysisCMAJ2010182101039104420530163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThanMCullenLReidCMA 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation studyLancet201137797711077108421435709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThanMCullenLAldousSA 2-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT TrialJ Am Coll Cardiol201259232091209822578923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThanMAldousSLordSJA 2-hour diagnostic protocol for possible cardiac chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Intern Med20141741515824100783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThanMHerbertMFlawsDWhat is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the emergency department? A clinical surveyInt J Cardiol2013166375275423084108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HessEPHollanderJESchafferJTShared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trialBMJ2016355i616527919865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChewDPScottIACullenLNational Heart Foundation of Aus-tralia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016Heart Lung Circ201625989595127476580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmsterdamEAKirkJDBluemkeDAAmerican Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart AssociationCirculation2010122171756177620660809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoffiMPatronoCColletJP2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Eur Heart J201637326731526320110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitchellAMGarveyJLChandraAProspective multicenter study of quantitative pre-test probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain unitsAnn Emerg Med200647544716631984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NapoliAMThe association between pretest probability of coronary artery disease and stress test utilization and outcomes in a chest pain observation unitAcad Emerg Med201421440140724730402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThanMFlawsDSandersSDevelopment and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocolEmerg Med Australas2014261344424428678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CullenLMuellerCParsonageWAValidation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndromeJ Am Coll Cardiol201362141242124923583250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DurairajLReillyBDasKEmergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomesAm J Med2001110171111152858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SniderAPapaleoMBeldnerSIs telemetry monitoring necessary in low-risk suspected acute chest pain syndromes?Chest2002122251752312171825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HollanderJESitesFDPollackCVShoferFSLack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest painAnn Emerg Med2004431717614707944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrossmanSAShapiroNIMottleyJLIs telemetry useful in evaluating chest pain patients in an observation unit?Intern Emerg Med20116654354621739228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SyedSGatienMPerryJJProspective validation of a clinical decision rule to identify patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who can safely be removed from cardiac monitoringCMAJ20171894E13914528246315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GeorgeTAshoverSCullenLIntroduction of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in the assessment of emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome: the Nambour Short Low-Intermediate Chest pain projectEmerg Med Australas201325434034423911025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParsonageWAMilburnTAshoverSImplementing change: evaluating the Accelerated Chest pain Risk Evaluation (ACRE) projectMed J Aust2017207520120528987133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeekRBraitbergGCullenLOutcome at 30 days for low-risk chest pain patients assessed using an accelerated diagnostic pathway in the emergency departmentEmerg Med Australas201628327928626998819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MunroARJerramTMortonTHamiltonSUse of an accelerated diagnostic pathway allows rapid and safe discharge of 70% of chest pain patients from the emergency departmentN Z Med J201512814086271
   Google Scholar
• SoremekunOAHamedaniAShoferFSSafety of a rapid diagnostic protocol with accelerated stress testingAm J Emerg Med201432212412824211281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RahmanFMitraBCameronPAColeridgeJStress testing before discharge is not required for patients with low and intermediate risk of acute coronary syndrome after emergency department short stay assessmentEmerg Med Australas201022544945620874820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LittHIGatsonisCSnyderBSafety of CT angiography for rapid “rule-out” of acute coronary syndromeN Engl J Med20123661393140322449295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoffmannUTruongQASchoenfeldDAROMICAT-II InvestigatorsCoronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest painN Engl J Med201236729930822830462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaffGLChinnaiyanKMCuryRCSociety of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines CommitteeSCCT guidelines on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines CommitteeJ Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr20148425427125151918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodacreSThokalaPCarrollCSystematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of diagnostic strategies for suspected acute coronary syndromeHealth Technol Assess2013171vvi1188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar