Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome

References

• Abdelkader AM, Yeh J. The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2009;2009:584837. doi:10.1155/2009/584837
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang Y, He QD, Zhang TT, Wang JJ, Huang SC, Ye Y. Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:45. doi:10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:265–277. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP, Poulson AM Jr, Carrell DT, Urry RL. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:535–544. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56942-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhaz-Jorge C, De GC, Kupka MS, et al.; European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM); European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1957–1973. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauser BC, Nargund G, Andersen AN, et al. Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2678–2684. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Shi Y, Wang E, et al. Ovarian stimulated cycle: not a better alternative for women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination. Oncotarget. 2017;8:100773–100780. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.22052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govindarajan M, Mallikarjunan S, Ahmed HSR, et al. Retrospective study of factors affecting intrauterine insemination pregnancy outcome: the impact of male habits and working environment. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10:114–118. doi:10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_3_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thijssen A, Creemers A, Van der Elst W, et al. Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination with frozen donor semen: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:590–597. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen KR, He AL, Styer AK, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Reproductive Medicine Network. Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinelli L, Courbière B, Achard V, et al. Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband’s sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2019 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:994–1000. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe DL, Marquard K, Liu L. The telomere theory of reproductive senescence in women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:280–285. doi:10.1097/01.gco.0000193019.05686.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He A, Zou Y, Wan C, et al. The role of transcriptomic biomarkers of endometrial receptivity in personalized embryo transfer for patients with repeated implantation failure. J Transl Med. 2021;19:176. doi:10.1186/s12967-021-02837-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:237–248. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01679-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ, Sloter E, et al. The association of age and semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:447–454. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weisz N, Friger M, Potashnik G. Relationship between age and semen parameters in men with normal sperm concentration: analysis of 6022 semen samples. Andrologia. 2007;39:45–50. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00761.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs M, De Jonge C, Cox A, Janssen M, Bosmans E, Ombelet W. Correlation between male age, WHO sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging and outcome in assisted reproduction technology. Andrologia. 2011;43:174–179. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01040.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens L, Kos S, Beijer C, et al. Semen Section of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1462–1468. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton JA, Cissen M, Brandes M, et al. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1110–1121. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalti S, Gürbüz B, Sezer H, Celik S. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Arch Androl. 2004;50:239–246. doi:10.1080/01485010490448435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Saravelos SH, Wang Q, Xu Y, Li TC, Zhou C. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:197–205. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, Schmitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, Schneider HP. Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1186 infertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:106–113. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00484-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:147–149. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00413-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhang Q, Li Y. The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:100. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-10-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat R, Beutler S, Schötzau A, De Geyter M, De Geyter C. Endometrial thickness influences neonatal birth weight in pregnancies with obstetric complications achieved after fresh IVF-ICSI cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W. Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? Fertil Steril. 2004;82:25–26. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucuk T. Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:427–430. doi:10.1007/s10815-008-9247-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem ME, Bakre NI, Emam MA, et al. The effects of timing of intrauterine insemination in relation to ovulation and the number of inseminations on cycle pregnancy rate in common infertility etiologies. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:576–583. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards RG, Brody SA. Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara I, Balet R, Grudzinskas JG. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Pregnancy outcome in relation to age and ovarian stimulation regime. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2320–2324. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.9.2320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botchan A, Hauser R, Gamzu R, Yogev L, Paz G, Yavetz H. Results of 6139 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2298–2304. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.11.2298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brucker M, Haentjens P, Evenepoel J, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H. Cumulative delivery rates in different age groups after artificial insemination with donor sperm. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1891–1899. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar CM, Liu E, Armstrong S, Arroll N, Lensen S, Brown J. Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus expectant management for unexplained infertility (TUI): a pragmatic, open-label, randomised, controlled, two-centre trial. Lancet. 2018;391:441–450. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32406-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuzuarregui JL, Meseguer M, Garrido N, Simón C, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Parameters affecting the results in a program of artificial insemination with donor sperm. A 12-year retrospective review of more than 1800 cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21:109–118. doi:10.1023/B:JARG.0000029494.55273.a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond MP, Legro RS, Coutifaris C, et al. NICHD reproductive medicine network. letrozole, gonadotropin, or clomiphene for unexplained infertility. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1230–1240. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeraer K, Debrock S, De Loecker P, et al. Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1079–1088. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francavilla F, Sciarretta F, Sorgentone S, et al. Intrauterine insemination with or without mild ovarian stimulation in couples with male subfertility due to oligo/astheno- and/or teratozoospermia or antisperm antibodies: a prospective cross-over trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1009–1011. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Lian F. [The clinical application of Letrozole in male or female infertility and OHSS]. World Latest Med Inf. 2016;16:58–60,74. [In Chinese]
   Google Scholar
• Wu YL, Zhang Y, Tang LM, et al. [Establishment of the proposed 4th national standard reference for human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG)]. Chin J Pharm Anal. 2016;36:1487–1494. [In Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Busch AS, Hagen CP, Almstrup K, Main KM, Juul A. Genetic variations altering FSH action affect circulating hormone levels as well as follicle growth in healthy peripubertal girls. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:897–904. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar