How Much Benefit Can Patients Acquire from Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols with Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

References

• Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606–617. doi:10.1093/bja/78.5.606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli F. Physiologic considerations of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs: implications of the stress response. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(2):110–119. doi:10.1007/s12630-014-0264-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon KCH. Overview: key elements and the impact of enhanced recovery care. In: Francis N, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Mythen MG, editors. Manual of Fast Track Recovery for Colorectal Surgery. London: Springer-Verlag; 2012:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lumb AB, McLure HA. AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015 - a further example of ‘aggregation of marginal gains’. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):3–6. doi:10.1111/anae.13327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christelis N, Wallace S, Sage CE, et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery program for hip and knee arthroplasty. Med J Aust. 2015;202(7):363–368. doi:10.5694/mja14.00601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geltzeiler CB, Rotramel A, Wilson C, Deng L, Whiteford MH, Frankhouse J. Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(9):955–961. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalsky SJ, Zenati MS, Steve J, et al. A combination of robotic approach and ERAS pathway optimizes outcomes and cost for pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;269(6):1138–1145. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parise P, Ferrari C, Cossu A, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway in esophagectomy: is a reasonable prediction of hospital stay possible? Ann Surg. 2019;270(1):77–83. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RF, Li Y, Guzman A, et al. Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery program in gynecologic surgery on healthcare costs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):66.e61–66.e69. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz N, Sharma M, Adams S, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:415–426. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaed I, Bossi B, Ganau M, Tinterri B, Giordano M, Chibbaro S. Current state of benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in spinal surgeries: a systematic review of the literature. Neuro-Chirurgie. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanders TM, Ifrach J, Sinha S, et al. Reduction of postoperative opioid use after elective spine and peripheral nerve surgery using an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Pain Med. 2020;21(12):3283–3291. doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wu X, Wu W, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;196:106003. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C, Zhang Y, Chong F, et al. Establishment and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway tailored for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:e317–e323. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soffin EM, Beckman JD, Tseng A, et al. Enhanced recovery after lumbar spine fusion: a randomized controlled trial to assess the quality of patient recovery. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(2):350–363. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Erken HY, Bae J. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results of mean 46-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3731983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamson S, Lu D, Sampson PD, Zhang Y. Full-endoscopic lumbar fusion outcomes in patients with minimal deformities: a Retrospective Study of data collected between 2011 and 2015. Pain Physician. 2019;22(1):75–88. doi:10.36076/ppj/2019.22.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ao S, Zheng W, Wu J, et al. Comparison of preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;76:136–143. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Daneshmand S, Bazargani ST, et al. Postoperative pain management after radical cystectomy: comparing traditional versus enhanced recovery protocol pathway. J Urol. 2015;194(5):1209–1213. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan J, Bisson EF, Dailey AT, Hood RS, Schmidt MH. Comparison of clinical outcomes in the national neurosurgery quality and outcomes database for open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2016;41(7):E416–E421. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(10):1780–1784. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan NR, Clark AJ, Lee SL, Venable GT, Rossi NB, Foley KT. Surgical outcomes for minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(6):847–874; discussion 874. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright TW, Immins T, Middleton RG. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016;30(1):91–102. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2015.11.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang MY, Chang HK, Grossman J. Reduced acute care costs with the ERAS® minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with conventional minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(4):827–834. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Chang P-Y, Grossman J. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(4):411–418. doi:10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerolus MG, Yerneni K, Witiw CD, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion decreases length of stay and opioid consumption. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(3):648–657. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soffin EM, Vaishnav AS, Wetmore DS, et al. Design and IMPLEMENTATION of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for minimally invasive lumbar decompression spine surgery: initial experience. Spine. 2019;44(9):E561–E570. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, et al. The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(1):53–59. doi:10.1007/s00384-010-1056-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas KW, Biere SS, van Hoogstraten IM, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):131–137. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2233-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okholm C, Goetze JP, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(9):1027–1034. doi:10.3109/00365521.2014.917698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MV, McMahon ML, Stucke RS, Barth RJ Jr. Wide variation and excessive dosage of opioid prescriptions for common general surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2017;265(4):709–714. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lersberghe C, Camu F, de Keersmaecker E, Sacré S. Continuous administration of fentanyl for postoperative pain: a comparison of the epidural, intravenous, and transdermal routes. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6(4):308–314. doi:10.1016/0952-8180(94)90078-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008;11(2 Suppl):S105–S120. doi:10.36076/ppj.2008/11/S105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young R, Cottrill E, Pennington Z, et al. Experience with an enhanced recovery after spine surgery protocol at an academic community hospital. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020:1–8. doi:10.3171/2020.7.SPINE20358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali ZS, Flanders TM, Ozturk AK, et al. Enhanced recovery after elective spinal and peripheral nerve surgery: pilot study from a single institution. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019:1–9. doi:10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar