Attitudes, Barriers, and Concerns Regarding Telemedicine Among Swedish Primary Care Physicians: A Qualitative Study

References

• Encyclopaedia Britannica. Telemedicine; 2013. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/science/telemedicine. Accessed July 9, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Encyclopaedia Britannica. E-health; 2013. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/science/e-health. Accessed July 9, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson G. Using the Internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(3):175–180. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson S, Jarlman O. A short overview of eHealth in Sweden. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2004;63(4):317–321. doi:10.3402/ijch.v63i4.17748
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmstrom I. Decision aid software programs in telenursing: not used as intended? Experiences of Swedish telenurses. Nurs Health Sci. 2007;9(1):23–28. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00299.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson AM, Lindberg I, Soderberg S. The views of health-care personnel about video consultation prior to implementation in primary health care in rural areas. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014;15(2):170–179. doi:10.1017/S1463423613000030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson AM, Lindberg I, Soderberg S. Healthcare personnel’s experiences using video consultation in primary healthcare in rural areas. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(1):73–83. doi:10.1017/S1463423616000347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman B, Thulesius H, Wilkens J, Lindgren A, Cronberg O, Arvidsson E. Utilization of digital primary care in Sweden: descriptive analysis of claims data on demographics, socioeconomics, and diagnoses. Int J Med Inform. 2019;127:134–140. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldh AC, Sverker A, Bendtsen P, Nilsson E. Health Care Professionals’ Experience of a Digital Tool for Patient Exchange, Anamnesis, and Triage in Primary Care: qualitative Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2020;7(4):e21698. doi:10.2196/21698
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bitar H, Alismail S. The role of eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine for chronic disease patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review. Digit Health. 2021;7:20552076211009396. doi:10.1177/20552076211009396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashshur RL, Howell JD, Krupinski EA, Harms KM, Bashshur N, Doarn CR. The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(5):342–375. doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mold F, Hendy J, Lai YL, de Lusignan S. Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2019;7(4):e13042. doi:10.2196/13042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eze ND, Mateus C, Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi T. Telemedicine in the OECD: an umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237585. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveland S, Islam S. Key considerations in ensuring a safe regional telehealth care model: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2021. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen OT, Alishahi Tabriz A, Huo J, Hanna K, Shea CM, Turner K. Impact of asynchronous electronic communication-based visits on clinical outcomes and health care delivery: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e27531. doi:10.2196/27531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse CS, Ehrbar N. Effects of computerized decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(8):e17283. doi:10.2196/17283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakim D. Development and significance of automated history-taking software for clinical medicine, clinical research and basic medical science. J Intern Med. 2016;280(3):287–299. doi:10.1111/joim.12509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kueper JK, Terry AL, Zwarenstein M, Lizotte DJ. Artificial intelligence and primary care research: a scoping review. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(3):250–258. doi:10.1370/afm.2518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liyanage H, Liaw ST, Jonnagaddala J, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Primary Health Care: perceptions, Issues, and Challenges. Yearb Med Inform. 2019;28(1):41–46. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spanig S, Emberger-Klein A, Sowa JP, Canbay A, Menrad K, Heider D. The virtual doctor: an interactive clinical-decision-support system based on deep learning for non-invasive prediction of diabetes. Artif Intell Med. 2019;100:101706. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Kang J, Yeo J. Medical specialty recommendations by an artificial intelligence chatbot on a smartphone: development and deployment. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e27460. doi:10.2196/27460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nymberg VM, Bolmsjo BB, Wolff M, Calling S, Gerward S, Sandberg M. ‘Having to learn this so late in our lives … ’ Swedish elderly patients’ beliefs, experiences, attitudes and expectations of e-health in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(1):41–52. doi:10.1080/02813432.2019.1570612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson-Jarhult F, Kjellstrom S, Josefsson KA. Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users’ experiences and care patterns. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021;1–10. doi:10.1080/02813432.2021.1913904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):146. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, organizational, and technological factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mobile health tools: systematic literature review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(2):e15935. doi:10.2196/15935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(1):212–220. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairat S, Marc D, Crosby W, Al Sanousi A. Reasons for physicians not adopting clinical decision support systems: critical analysis. JMIR Med Inform. 2018;6(2):e24. doi:10.2196/medinform.8912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MM, Freeman M, Kaye J, Vuckovic N, Buckley DI. A systematic review of clinician and staff views on the acceptability of incorporating remote monitoring technology into primary care. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(5):428–438. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury C, Murphy M, Duncan P. The Impact of Digital-First Consultations on Workload in General Practice: modeling Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e18203. doi:10.2196/18203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez T, Anaya YB, Shih KJ, Tarn DM. A qualitative study of primary care physicians’ experiences with telemedicine during COVID-19. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(Suppl):S61–S70. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy M, Scott LJ, Salisbury C, et al. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(704):e166–e177. doi:10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlund AJ, Holm IM, Zanaboni P. General practitioners’ perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e028251. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronning A, Assing Hvidt E, Nisbeth Brogger M, Fage-Butler A. How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e039442. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorndell C, Premberg A. Physicians’ experiences of video consultation with patients at a public virtual primary care clinic: a qualitative interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021;39(1):67–76. doi:10.1080/02813432.2021.1882082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Larsson M, Ivarsson B. General Practitioners’ Experiences of Digital Written Patient Dialogues: a Pilot Study Using a Mixed Method. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720909656. doi:10.1177/2150132720909656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entezarjou A, Bolmsjo BB, Calling S, Midlov P, Milos nymberg V. Experiences of digital communication with automated patient interviews and asynchronous chat in Swedish primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e036585. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikkemaat M, Thulesius H, Milos Nymberg V. Swedish Primary Care Physicians’ Intentions to Use Telemedicine: a Survey Using a New Questionnaire - Physician Attitudes and Intentions to Use Telemedicine (PAIT). Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:3445–3455. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S319497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Available from: https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/. Accessed September 9, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Institute. Healthcare in Sweden; 2021. Available from: https://sweden.se/life/society/healthcare-in-sweden. Accessed September 9, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Vision for e-health 2025 - common starting points for digitalisation of social services and health care. S2016.012; 2016. Available from: https://ehalsa2025.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/vision-for-ehealth-2025.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Vision for e-health 2025: follow-up 2019; 2020. Available from: https://ehalsa2025.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Follow-up-2019_Vision-e-health-2025.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Stiernstedt G, Zetterberg D, Stjernquist A, Elgán C Digi-physical patient care choice - Accessible primary care based on need and continuity. SoU 2019:42. Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 2019. Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/4ad5e9/contentassets/6e378658462844798630946d5bf12fc3/digifysiskt-vardval-_-tillganglig-primarvard-baserad-pa-behov-och-kontinuitet.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Persson J, Rydenfalt C. Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e26694. doi:10.2196/26694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis J. Constructing Questionnaires Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Manual for Health Services Researchers. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pit SW, Vo T, Pyakurel S. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates - A systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:76. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter P, Lorig K, Laurent D, Matthews K. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e29. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen JH, Neighbour R. Five cards: a simple guide to beginning the consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(620):150–151. doi:10.3399/bjgp14X677662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold KJ, Laurie AR, Kinney DR, Harmes KM, Serlin DC. Video Visits: family Physician Experiences With Uptake During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Fam Med. 2021;53(3):207–210. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.613099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar