Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG)

References

• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982;69(2):349–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang W, Wang X, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(11):6062–6071. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06950-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology. 2012;265(1):59–69. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae MS, Moon WK, Chang JM, et al. Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography. Radiology. 2014;270(2):369–377. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho N, Han W, Han BK, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(11):1495–1502. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmachtenberg C, Fischer T, Hamm B, Bick U. Diagnostic performance of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasonography with breast MRI as the gold standard. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(8):954–961. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg WA. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(2):390–399. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JM, Cha JH, Park JS, Kim SJ, Moon WK. Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and category on serial examinations. Acta Radiol. 2015;56(10):1163–1170. doi:10.1177/0284185114551565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(9):1554–1563. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology. 2015;274(3):663–673. doi:10.1148/radiol.14132832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein MJ. The University of Southern California/Van Nuys prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg. 2003;186(4):337–343. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00265-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick EL, Ebuoma L, Hamame A, et al. BI-RADS update for breast cancer caregivers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150(2):243–254. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3332-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2206–2223. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun G, Kim SM, Yun B, Ahn HS, Jang M. Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses. Ultrasonography. 2019;38(3):264–271. doi:10.14366/usg.18055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi EJ, Choi H, Park EH, Song JS, Youk JH. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2018;99:138–145. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeh SK, Kim SH, Choi JJ, et al. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions. Acta Radiol. 2016;57(2):162–169. doi:10.1177/0284185115574872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Kim SJ. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data. Acta Radiol. 2011;52(1):8–14. doi:10.1258/ar.2010.100179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vourtsis A, Kachulis A. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1886 women. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(2):592–601. doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5011-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Lin X, Tan Y, et al. A multicenter hospital-based diagnosis study of automated breast ultrasound system in detecting breast cancer among Chinese women. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30(2):231–239. doi:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.02.06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Jiang YX, Zhu QL, et al. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2255–2263. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Chae EY, Cha JH, et al. Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 2018;108:261–268. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisserie-Lacroix M, Macgrogan G, Debled M, et al. Triple-negative breast cancers: associations between imaging and pathological findings for triple-negative tumors compared with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancers. Oncologist. 2013;18(7):802–811. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Liu HY, Liu D, Song YQ. Ultrasonographic features of triple-negative breast cancer: a comparison with other breast cancer subtypes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(8):3229–3232. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.8.3229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng FY, Yan LX, Huang BJ, et al. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(11):2123–2129. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Ma G, Liang M, et al. Factors that influence ultrasound evaluation of breast tumor size. Med Ultrason. 2019;21(2):144–151. doi:10.11152/mu-1747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zelst JC, Platel B, Karssemeijer N, Mann RM. Multiplanar reconstructions of 3D automated breast ultrasound improve lesion differentiation by radiologists. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(12):1489–1496. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng FY, Lu Q, Huang BJ, et al. Imaging features of automated breast volume scanner: correlation with molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86:267–275. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar