122
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Study on the Application of Systemic Inflammation Response Index and Platelet–Lymphocyte Ratio in Ovarian Malignant Tumors

, , &
Pages 10015-10022 | Published online: 18 Dec 2021

References

  • Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi:10.3322/caac.21338
  • De Vorkin L, Hattersley M, Kim P, et al. Autophagy inhibition enhances sunitinib efficacy in clear cell ovarian carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15(3):250–258. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0132
  • Torre LA, Trabert B, De Santis CE, et al. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA CANCER J CLIN. 2018;68:284–296. doi:10.3322/caac.21456
  • Wang YX, Wang YX, Li YK, et al. The emerging roles of extracellular vesicles in ovarian cancer. Curr Drug Metab. 2021;22(2):139–149. doi:10.2174/1389200221666201110155721
  • Akinwunmi BO, Babic A, Vitonis AF, et al. Chronic medical conditions and CA125 levels among women without ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers. 2018;27(12):1483–1490. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0203
  • Feng F, Tian Y, Xu G, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19–9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3738-y
  • Fan HY, Duan DM, Liu YF. The diagnostic value of determination of serum GOLPH3 associated with CA125, CA19. 9 in patients with ovarian cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(18):4039–4044.
  • Peng SJ, Wang CF, Yu YJ, et al. CYFRA21-1/TG ratio as an accurate risk factor to predict eye metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a STROBE-compliant article. Medicine. 2020;99:46. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022773
  • Stall KE, Martin EW Jr. Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen levels in ovarian cancer patients: a chart review and survey of published data. J Reprod Med. 1981;26(2):73–79.
  • Ness RB, Grisso JA, Cottreau C, et al. Factors related to inflammation of the ovarian epithelium and risk of ovarian cancer. Epidemiology. 2000;11(2):111–117. doi:10.1097/00001648-200003000-00006
  • Abu-Shawer O, Abu-Shawer M, Haimour A, et al. Hematologic markers of distant metastases in gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(3):529. doi:10.21037/jgo.2019.01.12
  • Mezouar S, Frère C, Darbousset R, et al. Role of platelets in cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis: experimental and clinical evidences. Thromb Res. 2016;139:65–76. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.006
  • Lammert J, Skandarajah AR, Shackleton K, et al. Outcomes of women at high familial risk for breast cancer: an 8-year single-center experience. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020;16(2):27–37.
  • Morse CB, Norquist BM, Harrell MI, et al. Neoplastic cellularity is associated with clinical and molecular features of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(2):389–392. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.324
  • Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, Dimet J, Winer N, Ducarme G. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):28. doi:10.1186/s13048-019-0503-7
  • Drapkin R, Von Horsten HH, Lin Y, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a secreted glycoprotei n that is overexpressed by serous and endometrioid ovarian carci nomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2162–2169. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3924
  • Havrilesky LJ, Whitehead CM, Rubatt JM, et al. Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(3):374–382. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.041
  • Hamed EO, Ahmed H, Sedeek OB, Mohammed AM, Abd-Alla AA, Ghaffar HMA. Significance of HE4 estimation in comparison with CA125 in diagnosis of ovarian cancer and assessment of treatment response. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8(1):11–18. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-8-11
  • Rasmussen CB, Kjaer SK, Albieri V, et al. Pelvic information disease and the risk of ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumor: a pooled analysis of 13 case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(1):8–20. doi:10.1093/aje/kww161
  • Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
  • Gregory AD, Houghton AM. Tumor-associated neutrophils: new targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2011;71(7):2411–2416. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2583
  • Qi Q, Zhuang L, Shen Y, et al. A novel systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) for predicting the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer after chemotherapy. Cancer. 2016;122(14):2158–2167. doi:10.1002/cncr.30057
  • Yang B. The Clinical Significance of Preoperative LMR and PNI in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Malignant Tumors [D]. Yanbian University; 2019.
  • Jenne CN, Kubes P. Platelets in inflammation and infection. Platelets. 2015;26(4):286. doi:10.3109/09537104.2015.1010441
  • Davis A, Afsharkharghan V, Sood AK. Platelet effects on ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol. 2014;41(3):378–384. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.04.004
  • Li QQ, Lu ZH, Yang L, et al. Neutrophil count and the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score predict survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(2):945–950. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.945
  • Shen J, Zhu Y, Wu W, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:315–324.
  • Yildiz Y, Kucukzeybek Y, Alacacioglu A, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur Gynaecol Oncol. 2017;38(3):444–448.
  • Miao Y, Yan Q, Li S, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio are predictive of chemotherapeutic response and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Biomarkers. 2016;17(1):33–40. doi:10.3233/CBM-160614
  • Raungkaewmanee S, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S, et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor for epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2012;23(4):265–273. doi:10.3802/jgo.2012.23.4.265