Development and Evaluation of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (ICCPR) Program Certification for Low-Resource Settings

References

• Prabhakaran D, Anand S, Watkins D, et al. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and related disorders: key messages from disease control priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1224–1236. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32471-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi NQ, Mufarrih SH, Bloomfield GS, et al. Disparities in cardiovascular research output and disease outcomes among high-, middle- and low-income countries - an analysis of global cardiovascular publications over the last decade (2008–2017). Glob Heart. 2021;16(1):4. doi:10.5334/gh.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace SL, Turk-Adawi KI, Contractor A, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings. Heart. 2016;102(18):1449–1455. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields GE, Wells A, Doherty P, Heagerty A, Buck D, Davies LM. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Heart. 2018;104(17):1403–1410. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesah E, Turk-Adawi K, Supervia M, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery in low/middle-income countries. Heart. 2019;105(23):1806–1812. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamataz T, Uddin J, Ibn Alam S, Taylor RS, Pakosh M, Grace SL. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;70:119–174. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2021.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu AS, Lopez-Jimenez F, Thomas RJ, et al. Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):471. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1658-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grace SL, Turk-Adawi KI, Contractor A, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings: an international council of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation consensus statement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59(3):303–322. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2016.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e001570. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–1748. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury MI, Turk-Adawi K, Babu AS, et al. Development of the international cardiac rehabilitation registry including variable selection and definition process. Glob Heart. 2022;17(1):1. doi:10.5334/gh.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abukhadijah HJ, Turk-Adawi KI, Dewart N, Grace SL. Qualitative study measuring the usability of the international cardiac rehabilitation registry. BMJ Open. 2022;12(8):e064255. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl C, Badenhorst M, Hanekom S, Heine M. Unravelling ‘low-resource settings’: a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005190. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furze G, Doherty PJ, Grant-Pearce C. Development of a UK national certification programme for cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Cardiol. 2016;23:102–105.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty P, Salman A, Furze G, et al. Does cardiac rehabilitation meet minimum standards: an observational study using UK national audit? Open Heart. 2017;4(1):e000519. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2016-000519
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas RJ, Balady G, Banka G, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on performance measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(16):1814–1837. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack QR, Bauldoff G, Lichtman SW, et al. Prioritization development, and validation of American Association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation performance measures. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018;38(4):208–214. doi:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu A, Frederix I, Dendale P, et al. Standardization and quality improvement of secondary prevention through cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes in Europe: the avenue towards EAPC accreditation programme: a position statement of the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;28:496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghei M, Oh P, Chessex C, Grace SL. Cardiac rehabilitation quality improvement: a NARRATIVE REVIEW. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019;39(4):226–234. doi:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra VM, Gaalema DE, Pakosh M, Grace SL. Systematic review of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines: quality and scope. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(9):912–928. doi:10.1177/2047487319878958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktaa S, Gencer B, Arbelo E, et al. European Society of cardiology quality indicators for cardiovascular disease prevention: developed by the working group for cardiovascular disease prevention quality indicators in collaboration with the European Association for preventive cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(7):1060–1071. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwab160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecchin R, Candelaria D, Ferry C, et al. Development of quality indicators for cardiac rehabilitation in Australia: a modified delphi method and pilot test. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(11):1622–1630. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2018.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. ICCPR Program Certification. 2010. Available from https://globalcardiacrehab.com/Program-Certification. Accessed May 25, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Hashimov E. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook and the coding manual for qualitative researchers. Tech Comm Quart. 2015;24(1):109–112. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
   Google Scholar
• Astley CM, Beleigoli A, Tavella R, et al. Assessing the quality of cardiac rehabilitation programs by measuring adherence to the Australian quality indicators. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):267. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07667-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher R, Ferry C, Candelaria D, Ladak L, Zecchin R. Evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation performance and initial benchmarks for Australia: an observational cross-state and territory snapshot study. Heart Lung Circ. 2020;29(9):1397–1404. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2020.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Adawi K, Ghisi GL, Tran C, et al. First report of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation’s registry (ICRR). Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023;21(5):357–364. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2199154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar