Biological and osseointegration capabilities of hierarchically (meso-/micro-/nano-scale) roughened zirconia

References

• HudsonJIKenzoraJEHebelJREight-year outcome associated with clinical options in the management of femoral neck fracturesClin Orthop Relat Res19983485966
   Google Scholar
• Lu-YaoGLKellerRBLittenbergBWennbergJEOutcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reportsJ Bone Joint Surg Am199476115258288658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TidermarkJPonzerSSvenssonOSöderqvistATörnkvistHInternal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised, controlled trialJ Bone Joint Surg Br200385338038812729114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RavikumarKJMarshGInternal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur – 13 year results of a prospective randomised studyInjury2000311079379711154750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EspehaugBFurnesOHavelinLIEngesaeterLBVollsetSEThe type of cement and failure of total hip replacementsJ Bone Joint Surg Br200284683283812211673
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EskildsenSMWilsonZJMcNabbDCOlcottCWDel GaizoDJAcetabular reconstruction with the medial protrusio technique for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplastiesJ Arthroplasty201732113474347928634097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaghdadiYMLarsonANSierraRJLong-term results of the uncemented acetabular component in a primary total hip arthroplasty performed for protrusio acetabuli: a fifteen year median follow-upInt Orthop201539583984525381592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DonahueGSLindgrenVGaleaVPMadanatRMuratogluOKMalchauHRisk factors for mid-term revision surgery in patients with articular surface replacement total hip arthroplastyHip Int2018281444928574125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhatodMCafriGInacioMCScheppsALPaxtonEWBiniSARevision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgeryJ Bone Joint Surg Am201597535936625740025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SalassaTHoeffelDMehleSTatmanPGioeTJEfficacy of revision surgery for the dislocating total hip arthroplasty: report from a large community registryClin Orthop Relat Res2014472396296724150890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capon-GarciaDLopez-PardoAAlves-PerezMTCauses for revision surgery in total hip replacement. A retrospective epidemiological analysisRev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol201660316016626944512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CampionEWJetteAMClearyPDHarrisBAHip fracture: a prospective study of hospital course, complications, and costsJ Gen Intern Med19872278823559780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuccioneAAFagersonTLAndersonJJRegaining functional independence in the acute care setting following hip fracturePhys Ther19967688188268710961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SugitaYHondaYKatoIKuboKMaedaHOgawaTRole of photofunctionalization in mitigating impaired osseointegration associated with type 2 diabetes in ratsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants20142961293130025397793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HasegawaHOzawaSHashimotoKTakeichiTOgawaTType 2 diabetes impairs implant osseointegration capacity in ratsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200823223724618548919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OzawaSOgawaTIidaKSukotjoCHasegawaHNishimuraRDOvariectomy hinders the early stage of bone-implant integration: histomorphometric, biomechanical, and molecular analysesBone200230113714311792576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoyPKMedinaDShettyVAghalooTLDental implant failure rates and associated risk factorsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200520456957716161741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlokkevoldPRHanTJHow do smoking, diabetes, and periodontitis affect outcomes of implant treatment?Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants200722Suppl17320218437796
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DuZXiaoYHashimiSHamletSMIvanovskiSThe effects of implant topography on osseointegration under estrogen deficiency induced osteoporotic conditions: Histomorphometric, transcriptional and ultrastructural analysisActa Biomater20164235136327375286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarnsworthCWSchottEMBenvieAMObesity/type 2 diabetes increases inflammation, periosteal reactive bone formation, and osteolysis during Staphylococcus aureus implant-associated bone infectionJ Orthop Res Epub20171211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MonjeACatenaABorgnakkeWSAssociation between diabetes mellitus/hyperglycaemia and peri-implant diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysisJ Clin Periodontol201744663664828346753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnnibaliSPrannoNCristalliMPLa MonacaGPolimeniASurvival analysis of implant in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic reviewImplant Dent201625566367427540845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BachleMKohalRJA systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cellsClin Oral Implants Res200415668369215533129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoyanBDHummertTWDeanDDSchwartzZRole of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell responseBiomaterials19961721371468624390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KieswetterKSchwartzZDeanDDBoyanBDThe role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of boneCrit Rev Oral Biol Med1996743293458986395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ShalabiMMGortemakerAVan’t HofMAJansenJACreugersNHImplant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic reviewJ Dent Res200685649650016723643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooperLFA role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implantsJ Prosthet Dent200084552253411105008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MendoncaGMendoncaDBAragaoFJCooperLFAdvancing dental implant surface technology – From micron- to nanotopographyBiomaterials200829283822383518617258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooperLFMasudaTYliheikkilaPKFeltonDAGeneralizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studiesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants19981321631749581401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakeuchiKSaruwatariLNakamuraHKYangJMOgawaTEnhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surfaceJ Biomed Mater Res A200572329630515654712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgawaTNishimuraIDifferent bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200318220021012705297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgawaTNishimuraIGenes differentially expressed in titanium implant healingJ Dent Res200685656657016723657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ButzFAitaHWangCJOgawaTHarder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titaniumJ Dent Res200685656056516723656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakamuraHShimJButzFAitaHGuptaVOgawaTGlycosaminoglycan degradation reduces mineralized tissue-titanium interfacial strengthJ Biomed Mater Res A200677347848616482547
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MasudaTYliheikkilaPKFeltonDACooperLFGeneralizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studiesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants199813117299509776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlbrektssonTWennerbergAOral implant surfaces: Part 2 – review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfacesInt J Prosthodont200417554456415543911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrunskiJBPuleoDANanciABiomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developmentsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants2000151154610697938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManzanoGHerreroLRMonteroJComparison of clinical performance of zirconia implants and titanium implants in animal models: a systematic reviewInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants201429231132024683556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElnayefBLazaroASuarez-Lopez Del AmoFZirconia implants as an alternative to titanium: a systematic review and meta-analysisInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants2017323e125e13428170450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HashimDCioncaNCourvoisierDSMombelliAA systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implantsClin Oral Investig201620714031417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WenzHJBartschJWolfartSKernMOsseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic reviewInt J Prosthodont2008211273618350943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeingartDSteinemannSSchilliWTitanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial regionInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg1994236 Pt 24504527890998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiancoPDDucheynePCucklerJMLocal accumulation of titanium released from a titanium implant in the absence of wearJ Biomed Mater Res19963122272348731211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FriskenKWDandieGWLugowskiSJordanGA study of titanium release into body organs following the insertion of single threaded screw implants into the mandibles of sheepAust Dent J200247321421712405460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiciliaACuestaSComaGTitanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patientsClin Oral Implants Res200819882383518705814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoehlingSAstasov-FrauenhofferMHauser-GerspachIIn vitro biofilm formation on titanium and zirconia implant surfacesJ Periodontol201788329830727712464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-RadhaASDymockDYounesCO’SullivanDSurface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesionJ Dent201240214615322182466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakamuraKKannoTMilledingPOrtengrenUZirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic reviewInt J Prosthodont201023429930920617217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EgawaMMiuraTKatoTSaitoAYoshinariMIn vitro adherence of periodontopathic bacteria to zirconia and titanium surfacesDent Mater J201332110110623370877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RimondiniLCerroniLCarrassiATorricelliPBacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo studyInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200217679379812507238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScaranoADi CarloFQuarantaMPiattelliABone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbitsJ Oral Implantol200329181212614079
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KohalRJKlausGA zirconia implant-crown system: a case reportInt J Periodontics Restorative Dent200424214715315119885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al QahtaniWMSchilleCSpintzykSEffect of surface modification of zirconia on cell adhesion, metabolic activity and proliferation of human osteoblastsBiomed Tech (Berl)2017621758727107828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoffmannOAngelovNZafiropoulosGGAndreanaSOsseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbitsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants201227235235822442775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BormannKHGellrichNCKnihaHDardMWielandMGahlertMBiomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implantClin Oral Implants Res201223101210121622092587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AltmannBRabelKKohalRJCellular transcriptional response to zirconia-based implant materialsDent Mater201733224125528087075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamposilvanEFlamantQAngladaMSurface roughened zirconia: towards hydrothermal stabilityJ Mech Behav Biomed Mater2015479510625867636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RocchiettaIFontanaFAddisASchupbachPSimionMSurface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbitsClin Oral Implants Res200920884485019604281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MonteroJBravoMGuadillaYComparison of clinical and histologic outcomes of zirconia versus titanium implants placed in fresh sockets: a 5-month study in beaglesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants Epub2015211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KohalRJBachleMAttWOsteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materialsDent Mater201329776377623669198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GahlertMGudehusTEichhornSSteinhauserEKnihaHErhardtWBiomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigsClin Oral Implants Res200718566266817608736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchliephakeHHeftiTSchlottigFGedetPStaedtHMechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigsJ Clin Periodontol201037981882820573183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DepprichRZipprichHOmmerbornMOsseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: an in vivo studyHead Face Med200843019077228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MihatovicIGolubovicVBeckerJSchwarzFBone tissue response to experimental zirconia implantsClin Oral Investig2017212523532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgawaTOzawaSShihJHBiomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in ratsJ Dent Res200079111857186311145355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinGSLianJBMolecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotypeEndocr Rev19931444244428223340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiddhantiSRQuarlesLDMolecular to pharmacologic control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiationJ Cell Biochem19945533103207962162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlborziAMacKGlackinCAMurraySSZernikJHEndochondral and intramembranous fetal bone development: osteoblastic cell proliferation, and expression of alkaline phosphatase, m-twist, and histone H4J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol1996162941068773900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OwenTAAronowMShalhoubVProgressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrixJ Cell Physiol199014334204301694181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinella-JaegleSRoman-RomanSFaucheuCOpposite effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta1 on osteoblast differentiationBone200129432333011595614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllistonTChoyLDucyPKarsentyGDerynckRTGF-beta-induced repression of CBFA1 by Smad3 decreases cbfa1 and osteocalcin expression and inhibits osteoblast differentiationEmbo J20012092254227211331591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgawaTSukotjoCNishimuraIModulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughnessJ Prosthodont200211424124712501137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZhaoGSchwartzZWielandMHigh surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructureJ Biomed Mater Res A2005741495815924300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoyanBDBonewaldLFPaschalisEPOsteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopographyCalcif Tissue Int200271651952912232675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AitaHHoriNTakeuchiMThe effect of ultraviolet function-alization of titanium on integration with boneBiomaterials20093061015102519042016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuboKTsukimuraNIwasaFCellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy modelBiomaterials200930295319532919589591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TsukimuraNYamadaMIwasaFSynergistic effects of UV photofunctionalization and micro-nano hybrid topography on the biological properties of titaniumBiomaterials201132194358436821421270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IwasaFHoriNUenoTMinamikawaHYamadaMOgawaTEnhancement of osteoblast adhesion to UV-photofunctionalized titanium via an electrostatic mechanismBiomaterials201031102717272720035996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UenoTIkedaTTsukimuraNNovel antioxidant capability of titanium induced by UV light treatmentBiomaterials201610817718627639113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AttWHoriNTakeuchiMTime-dependent degradation of titanium osteoconductivity: an implication of biological aging of implant materialsBiomaterials200930295352536319595450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AttWTakeuchiMSuzukiTKuboKAnpoMOgawaTEnhanced osteoblast function on ultraviolet light-treated zirconiaBiomaterials20093071273128019095298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinamikawaHAttWIkedaTHirotaMOgawaTLong-term progressive degradation of the biological capability of titaniumMaterials20169E10228787899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoriNAttWUenoTAge-dependent degradation of the protein adsorption capacity of titaniumJ Dent Res200988766366719641155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeJHOgawaTThe biological aging of titanium implantsImplant Dent201221541542122968574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgawaTUltraviolet photofunctionalization of titanium implantsOral Craniofac Tissue Eng20122151158
   Google Scholar
• AttWHoriNIwasaFYamadaMUenoTOgawaTThe effect of UV-photofunctionalization on the time-related bioactivity of titanium and chromium-cobalt alloysBiomaterials200930264268427619473697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IwasaFTsukimuraNSugitaYTiO2 micro-nano-hybrid surface to alleviate biological aging of UV-photofunctionalized titaniumInt J Nanomed2011613271341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AttWOgawaTBiological aging of implant surfaces and their restoration with ultraviolet light treatment: a novel understanding of osseointegrationInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants201227475376122848875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UenoTTakeuchiMHoriNGamma ray treatment enhances bioactivity and osseointegration capability of titaniumJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater201210082279228722987777
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AltmannBKohalRJSteinbergTDistinct cell functions of osteoblasts on UV-functionalized titanium- and zirconia-based implant materials are modulated by surface topographyTissue Eng Part C Methods2013191185086323581275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TunaTWeinMAltmannBSteinbergTFischerJAttWEffect of ultraviolet photofunctionalisation on the cell attractiveness of zirconia implant materialsEur Cell Mater2015298294 discussion 95–9625612543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TunaTWeinMSwainMFischerJAttWInfluence of ultraviolet photofunctionalization on the surface characteristics of zirconia-based dental implant materialsDent Mater2015312e14e2425467951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IwasaFBabaKOgawaTEnhanced intracellular signaling pathway in osteoblasts on ultraviolet lighttreated hydrophilic titaniumBiomed Res201637111126912135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IkedaTHagiwaraYHirotaMEffect of photofunctionalization on fluoride-treated nanofeatured titaniumJ Biomater Appl20142881200121223985537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrezavscekMFawzyABachleMTunaTFischerJAttWThe effect of UV treatment on the osteoconductive capacity of zirconia-based materialsMaterials (Basel)2016912E95828774080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlokkevoldPRJohnsonPDadgostariSCaputoADaviesJENishimuraRDEarly endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbitClin Oral Implants Res200112435035711488864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooperLFZhouYTakebeJFluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implantsBiomaterials200627692693616112191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuoJPadillaRJAmbroseWDe KokIJCooperLFThe effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivoBiomaterials200728365418542517868850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlbrektssonTWennerbergAOral implant surfaces: Part 1 – review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to themInt J Prosthodont200417553654315543910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WennerbergAAlbrektssonTEffects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic reviewClin Oral Implants Res200920Suppl 417218419663964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WennerbergAAlbrektssonTOn implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinionsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants2010251637420209188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgawaTSaruwatariLTakeuchiKAitaHOhnoNTi Nano-nodular Structuring for Bone Integration and RegenerationJ Dent Res200887875175618650547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NishimuraIHuangYButzFOgawaTLinAWangCJDiscrete deposition of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on a titanium implant with predisposing substrate microtopography accelerated osseointegrationNanotechnology20071824245101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar