Targeting tumor cells and neovascularization using RGD-functionalized magnetoliposomes

References

• Shi X, Wang SH, Swanson SD, et al. Dendrimer-functionalized shell-crosslinked iron oxide nanoparticles for in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging of tumors. Adv Mater. 2008;20(9):1671–1678. doi:10.1002/adma.200702770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zheng L, Peng C, Shen M, Shi X, Zhang G. Folic acid-modified dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles as nanoprobes for targeted CT imaging of human lung adencarcinoma. Biomaterials. 2013;34(2):470–480. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.05423088841
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Q, Li K, Wen S, et al. Targeted CT/MR dual mode imaging of tumors using multifunctional dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2013;34(21):5200–5209. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.00923583039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Cheng K, Qi S, et al. Affibody modified and radiolabeled gold-iron oxide hetero-nanostructures for tumor PET, optical and MR imaging. Biomaterials. 2013;34(11):2796–2806. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.01423343632
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coenen HH, Elsinga PH, Iwata R, et al. Fluorine-18 radiopharmaceuticals beyond [18F]FDG for use in oncology and neurosciences. Nucl Med Biol. 2010;37(7):727–740. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.04.18520870148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkers EC, Oude Munnink TH, Kosterink JG, et al. Biodistribution of 89Zr-trastuzumab and PET imaging of HER2-positive lesions in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(5):586–592. doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.1220357763
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Gootjes EC, Huisman MC, et al. 89Zr-cetuximab PET imaging in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(30):30384–30393. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.467226309164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Loon J, Even AJG, Aerts HJWL, et al. PET imaging of zirconium-89 labelled cetuximab: a phase I trial in patients with head and neck and lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017;122(2):267–273. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.02028012793
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billaud EMF, Belderbos S, Cleeren F, et al. Pretargeted PET imaging using a bioorthogonal 18F-labeled trans-cyclooctene in an ovarian carcinoma model. Bioconjug Chem. 2017;28(12):2915–2920. doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b0063529191024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keinänen O, Fung K, Pourat J, et al. Pretargeting of internalizing trastuzumab and cetuximab with a 18F-tetrazine tracer in xenograft models. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(1):95. doi:10.1186/s13550-017-0344-629198065
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hong H, Sun J, Cai W. Radionuclide-based cancer imaging targeting the carcinoembryonic antigen. Biomark Insights. 2008;3:435–451. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19578524. Accessed February 16, 2018. doi:10.4137/BMI.S112419578524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aparici CM, Carlson D, Nguyen N, Hawkins RA, Seo Y. Combined SPECT and multidetector CT for prostate cancer evaluations. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;2(1):48–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22267999. Accessed February 16, 2018.22267999
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407(6801):249–257. doi:10.1038/3502522011001068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. 2001;7(9):987–989. doi:10.1038/nm0901-98711533692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J-P, Stehle T, Zhang R, et al. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science. 2002;296(5565):151–155. doi:10.1126/science.106904011884718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries JD, Byron A, Humphries MJ. Integrin ligands at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 19):3901–3903. doi:10.1242/jcs.0309816988024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12(1):697–715. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.6978970741
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Himmelreich U, Dresselaers T. Cell labeling and tracking for experimental models using magnetic resonance imaging. Methods. 2009;48(2):112–124. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.02019362150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amiri H, Bordonali L, Lascialfari A, et al. Protein corona affects the relaxivity and MRI contrast efficiency of magnetic nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2013;5(18):8656–8665. doi:10.1039/c3nr00345k23896964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschulik K, Compton RG. Nanoparticle impacts reveal magnetic field induced agglomeration and reduced dissolution rates. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16(27):13909–13913. doi:10.1039/C4CP01618A24898763
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bulte JWM, De Cuyper M, Despres D, Frank JA. Preparation, relaxometry, and biokinetics of PEGylated magnetoliposomes as MR contrast agent. J Magn Magn Mater. 1999;194(1–3):204–209. doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00556-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen SJH, Hodenius M, De Cuyper M. Magnetoliposomes: versatile innovative nanocolloids for use in biotechnology and biomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2009;4(2):177–191. doi:10.2217/17435889.4.2.17719193184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen SJ, Vande Velde G, Ketkar-Atre A, Himmelreich U, De Cuyper M. Magnetoliposomes as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2011;3(2):197–211. doi:10.1002/wnan.12225363747
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soenen SJ, De Meyer SF, Dresselaers T, et al. MRI assessment of blood outgrowth endothelial cell homing using cationic magnetoliposomes. Biomaterials. 2011;32(17):4140–4150. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.03721419482
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soenen SJH, Brisson AR, Jonckheere E, et al. The labeling of cationic iron oxide nanoparticle-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cells using targeted magnetoliposomes. Biomaterials. 2011;32(6):1748–1758. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.00521112624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketkar-Atre A, Struys T, Dresselaers T, et al. In vivo hepatocyte MR imaging using lactose functionalized magnetoliposomes. Biomaterials. 2014;35(3):1015–1024. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.02924210051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Leunig M, Huang SK, Berk DA, Papahadjopoulos D, Jain RK. Microvascular permeability and interstitial penetration of sterically stabilized (stealth) liposomes in a human tumor xenograft. Cancer Res. 1994;54(13):3352–3356. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8012948. Accessed February 15, 2018.8012948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda H. Toward a full understanding of the EPR effect in primary and metastatic tumors as well as issues related to its heterogeneity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;91:3–6. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.00225579058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Horowitz AT, Zalipsky S. Tumor cell targeting of liposome-entrapped drugs with phospholipid-anchored folic acid-PEG conjugates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(8):1177–1192. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.01115094214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derycke ASL, Kamuhabwa A, Gijsens A, et al. Transferrin-conjugated liposome targeting of photosensitizer AlPcS4 to rat bladder carcinoma cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(21):1620–1630. doi:10.1093/jnci/djh31415523091
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Cuyper M, Soenen SJH. Cationic magnetoliposomes. Weissig V, ed. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;605:97–111. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-360-2_620072875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manshian BB, Pfeiffer C, Pelaz B, et al. High-content imaging and gene expression approaches to unravel the effect of surface functionality on cellular interactions of silver nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2015;9(10):10431–10444. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b0466126327399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman J. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol. 2002;29(6 Suppl 16):15–18. doi:10.1053/sonc.2002.37263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma RA, Harris AL, Dalgleish AG, Steward WP, O’Byrne KJ. Angiogenesis as a biomarker and target in cancer chemoprevention. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(12):726–732. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00586-111902514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang F, Chen X. Integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-Targeted Cancer Therapy. Drug Dev Res. 2008;69(6):329–339. doi:10.1002/ddr.2026520628538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Stellacci F. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small. 2010;6(1):12–21. doi:10.1002/smll.20090115819844908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketkar-Atre A, Struys T, Soenen SJ, et al. Variability in contrast agent uptake by different but similar stem cell types. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:4577. doi:10.2147/IJN.S5158824399873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Ribeiro RS, Gysemans C, Da Cunha JPMCM, et al. Magnetoliposomes as contrast agents for longitudinal in vivo assessment of transplanted pancreatic islets in a diabetic rat model. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11487. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29136-930065302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia Ribeiro R, Ketkar-Atre A, Yin T, et al. Improved labeling of pancreatic islets using cationic magnetoliposomes. J Pers Med. 2018;8(1):12. doi:10.3390/jpm8010012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore A, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A. Uptake of dextran-coated monocrystalline iron oxides in tumor cells and macrophages. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7(6):1140–1145. doi:10.1002/jmri.18800706299400860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte JW, Douglas T, Witwer B, et al. Magnetodendrimers allow endosomal magnetic labeling and in vivo tracking of stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(12):1141–1147. doi:10.1038/nbt1201-114111731783
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struys T, Ketkar-Atre A, Gervois P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of human dental pulp stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(10):1813–1829. doi:10.3727/096368912X65777423050936
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trekker J, Leten C, Struys T, et al. Sensitive in vivo cell detection using size-optimized superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2014;35(5):1627–1635. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.00624246643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou X, Murphy FR, Gehdu N, Zhang J, Iredale JP, Benyon RC. Engagement of alphavbeta3 integrin regulates proliferation and apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(23):23996–24006. doi:10.1074/jbc.M31166820015044441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaret KS. Pancreatic beta cells: responding to the matrix. Cell Metab. 2006;3(3):148–150. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.00616517401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertrand N, Wu J, Xu X, Kamaly N, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;66:2–25. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.00924270007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernsting MJ, Murakami M, Roy A, Li S-D. Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2013;172(3):782–794. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.01324075927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos S, Govaerts K, Croitor Sava A, et al. Assessment of tumor microenvironment to determine the most suitable therapeutic window in an ovarian cancer model. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2018;26:abstract n° 3925 Available from: http://indexsmart.mirasmart.com/ISMRM2018/PDFfiles/3925.html. Accessed July 13, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Mason RP, Gimi B. Dynamic bioluminescence and fluorescence imaging of the effects of the antivascular agent Combretastatin-A4P (CA4P) on brain tumor xenografts. Cancer Lett. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger RA. Evaluation of the light emission kinetics in luciferin/luciferase-based in vivo bioluminescence imaging for guidance in the development of small animal imaging study design. UT Southwestern Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; 2006 Available from: https://repositories.tdl.org/utswmed-ir/handle/2152.5/737. Accessed February 16, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ. Targeting of drugs and nanoparticles to tumors. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(6):759–768. doi:10.1083/jcb.20091010420231381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Hollander A, Jans H, Vande VG, et al. Limiting the protein corona: A successful strategy for in vivo active targeting of anti-HER2 nanobody-functionalized nanostars. Biomaterials. 2017;123:15–23. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.00728152380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnida J-AMM, Ray A, Peterson CM, Ghandehari H. Geometry and surface characteristics of gold nanoparticles influence their biodistribution and uptake by macrophages. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;77(3):417–423. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.11.01021093587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard S, Boucher M, Lalatonne Y, Mériaux S, Motte L. Iron oxide nanoparticle surface decorated with cRGD peptides for magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Hong H, Grailer JJ, et al. cRGD-functionalized, DOX-conjugated, and 64Cu-labeled superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted anticancer drug delivery and PET/MR imaging. Biomaterials. 2011;32(17):4151–4160. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.00621367450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmierczak PM, Todica A, Gildehaus F-J, et al. 68Ga-TRAP-(RGD)3 hybrid imaging for the in vivo monitoring of αVß3-integrin expression as biomarker of anti-angiogenic therapy effects in experimental breast cancer. Chammas R, ed. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.016824827992512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar